The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XVI
TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM; HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES BONDS

Chapter 243
HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES BONDS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 243.22

243.22 Powers of authority.—The purpose of the authority shall be to assist institutions for higher education in the construction, financing, and refinancing of projects, and for this purpose the authority is authorized and empowered:

(1) To have perpetual succession as a body politic and corporate and to adopt bylaws for the regulation of its affairs and the conduct of its business.

(2) To adopt an official seal and alter the same at pleasure.

(3) To maintain an office at such place or places in the county as it may designate.

(4) To sue and be sued in its own name, and plead and be impleaded.

(5) To determine the location and character of any project to be financed under the provisions of this part; and

(a) To construct, reconstruct, maintain, repair, operate, lease as lessee or lessor and regulate the same;

(b) To enter into contracts for any or all of such purposes;

(d) To designate a participating institution for higher education as its agent to determine the location and character of a project undertaken by such participating institution for higher education under the provisions of this part and as the agent of the authority, to construct, reconstruct, maintain, repair, operate, lease as lessee or lessor, and regulate the same, and, as the agent of the authority, to enter into contracts for any or all of such purposes, including contracts for the management and operation of such project.

(6) To issue bonds, bond anticipation notes and other obligations of the authority for any of its corporate purposes, and to fund or refund the same, all as provided in this part.

(7) Generally, to fix and revise from time to time and charge and collect rates, rents, fees and charges for the use of and for the services furnished or to be furnished by a project or any portion thereof and to contract with any person, partnership, association, or corporation or other body public or private in respect thereof.

(8) To establish rules and regulations for the use of a project or any portion thereof and to designate a participating institution for higher education as its agent to establish rules and regulations for the use of a project undertaken by such participating institution for higher education.

(9) To employ consulting engineers, architects, attorneys, accountants, construction and financial experts, superintendents, managers, and such other employees and agents as may be necessary in its judgment, and to fix their compensation.

(10) To receive and accept from any public agency loans or grants for or in aid of the construction of a project or any portion thereof, and to receive and accept loans, grants, aid, or contributions from any source of either money, property, labor, or other things of value, to be held, used, and applied only for the purposes for which such loans, grants, aid, and contributions are made.

(11) To mortgage any project and the site thereof for the benefit of the holders of revenue bonds issued to finance such projects.

(12) To make loans to any participating institution for higher education for the cost of a project, including a loan in anticipation of tuition revenues, in accordance with an agreement between the authority and the participating institution for higher education; provided no such loan shall exceed the total cost of the project as determined by the participating institution for higher education and approved by the authority.

(13) To make loans to a participating institution for higher education to refund outstanding obligations, mortgages or advances issued, made or given by such participating institution for higher education for the cost of a project.

(14) To charge to and equitably apportion among participating institutions for higher education its administrative costs and expenses incurred in the exercise of the powers and duties conferred by this part.

(15) To do all things necessary or convenient to carry out the purposes of this part.

History.—s. 5, ch. 69-345; s. 18, ch. 99-252.

F.S. 243.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 243.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 243.22

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 243.22

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 243.22.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, v. ALABAMA, v., 988 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . See, e.g., 1975 Ala.Code §§ 9-14C-3 (park commission), 45-2-243.22 (tourism board), 45-5-90 (economic . . .

HENRY, v. LAKE CHARLES AMERICAN PRESS, L. L. C. Co. L. L. C., 566 F.3d 164 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F.2d 678, 680 (2d Cir.1942) (quotation marks, citations, and . . .

L. VERZILLI M. v. FLEXON, INC. d b a v. v. d b a, B. E. A. t d b a, L., 295 F.3d 421 (3d Cir. 2002)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Town of Babylon Suffolk County, N.Y., 129 F.2d 678, 680 (2d . . .

LEON COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY, v. HARTSFIELD,, 698 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 1997)

. . . . § 243.22(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). Moreover, the language of section 243.33 is broadly stated. . . .

DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. v. DESKTOP DIRECT, INC., 511 U.S. 863 (U.S. 1994)

. . . Court would have had little reason to go beyond the first factor in Cohen, see also United States v. 243.22 . . .

STEPHENSON, Jr. v. UNITED STATES, J. SNOGA, v. UNITED STATES, R. SNOGA, v. UNITED STATES,, 33 Fed. Cl. 63 (Fed. Cl. 1994)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres, 45 F.Supp. 361, 362 (E.D.N.Y.1942). . . .

A. KUSH ASSOCIATES, LIMITED, v. AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY,, 927 F.2d 929 (7th Cir. 1991)

. . . women] sit idle and functionless in a jury-box.’ ” Whitsell, 229 F.2d at 49 (quoting United States v. 243.22 . . .

v. Co. U. S. A. Co. Co. Co. Co., 13 Ct. Int'l Trade 96 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Town of Babylon, 129 F.2d 678, 680 (2d Cir. 1942), cert. denied . . .

SMITH CORONA CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES, Co. U. S. A. Co. Co., 706 F. Supp. 908 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Town of Babylon, 129 F.2d 678, 680 (2d Cir.1942), cert. denied . . .

MIAMI- DADE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION, INC. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY,, 28 Fla. Supp. 2d 14 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . to the property in its name, the Foundation was clearly the Authority’s “agent” pursuant to sections 243.22 . . .

In GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS KLUGER,, 827 F.2d 868 (2d Cir. 1987)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F.2d 678, 680 (2d Cir.1942), cert. denied sub nom. . . .

KOKE, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, A Co. P. O SULLIVAN, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO., 730 F.2d 211 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F.2d 678, 680 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Lambert v. . . .

In N- CASES. De, 691 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1982)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F.2d 678, 684 (2d Cir.), cert. denied. 317 U.S. 698, 63 S.Ct . . .

J. PARFAIT, v. CENTRAL TOWING, INC. v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO. Co., 667 F.2d 1189 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F.2d 678, 684 (2nd Cir. 1942), cert. denied sub nom. . . .

BARCELO, v. BROWN MEDINA E De v. BROWN, 478 F. Supp. 646 (D.P.R. 1979)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F.2d 678, 683 (2d Cir., 1942). . . .

FADDAH v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, 580 F.2d 132 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . was not available and could not have been discovered or presented at the [original] hearing.” 8 CFR § 243.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. W. WILLIAMS V., 441 F.2d 637 (5th Cir. 1971)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir. 1942, 129 F.2d 678, 684, cert. denied, 317 U.S. 698, 63 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS S. W., 309 F. Supp. 887 (N.D. Tex. 1969)

. . . Cir., 124 F.2d 959 (1942), cert. den. 316 U.S. 679, 62 S.Ct. 1106, 86 L.Ed. 1753; United States v. 243.22 . . .

TAYLOR v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, 288 F.2d 600 (2d Cir. 1961)

. . . supra, 324 U.S. at page 232, 65 S.Ct. at page 633, overruling our contrary decision in United States v. 243.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND,, 164 F. Supp. 451 (S.D. Cal. 1958)

. . . United States, 1875, 91 U.S. 367, 23 L.Ed. 449; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in the Town of . . .

CADDO TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA v. UNITED STATES, 155 F. Supp. 727 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . Cir., 124 F.2d 959, certiorari denied 316 U.S. 679, 62 S.Ct. 1106, 86 L.Ed. 1753; United States v. 243.22 . . .

THE CADDO TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 140 Ct. Cl. 63 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . S. 679; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F. 2d 678 (2nd Cir.), cert. den. 317 U. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND IN CITY OF CHEYENNE, LARAMIE COUNTY, WYOMING C. K. s a, 141 F. Supp. 300 (D. Wyo. 1956)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Village of Farmingdale, Town of Babylon, Suffolk County, N. . . .

A. SHWAB, Jr. v. R. DOELZ, 229 F.2d 749 (7th Cir. 1956)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, etc., 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, at page 680. . . .

M. WHITSELL, v. B. ALEXANDER, A. M. E. J. H., 229 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1956)

. . . As the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said, in United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F.2d . . .

UNITED STATES v. MERCHANTS MATRIX CUT SYNDICATE, INTERTYPE CORPORATION, v. CLARK- CONGRESS CORPORATION, MERCHANTS MATRIX CUT SYNDICATE, v. CLARK- CONGRESS CORPORATION, THE ADVERTISING CHECKING BUREAU, v. CLARK- CONGRESS CORPORATION,, 219 F.2d 90 (7th Cir. 1955)

. . . S. v. 243.22 Acres of Land, etc., 43 F.Supp. 561, 565; Id., 2 Cir., 1942, 129 F.2d 678. . See e.g. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN NEW LONDON COUNTY, CONNECTICUT A. Jr., 126 F. Supp. 789 (D. Conn. 1954)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Babylon, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, certiorari denied Lambert v. . . .

TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, VA. v. UNITED STATES, 198 F.2d 238 (4th Cir. 1952)

. . . Cushman Motor Works, 8 Cir., 178 F.2d 953; United States v. 243.22 Acres, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, certiorari . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, 104 F. Supp. 938 (W.D. Pa. 1952)

. . . S. v. 243.22 Acres of Land Situate in Village of Farmingdale, etc., D.C., 41 F.Supp. 469, affirmed 2 . . .

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU v. UNITED STATES, 188 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1951)

. . . Meyer, 7 Cir., 113 F.2d 387; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678. . . .

CANISTER CO. v. NATIONAL CAN CORPORATION CANISTER CO. v. SAME, 163 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1947)

. . . 911, made a firm stand “against piecemeal litigation,” overuling, among other cases, United States v. 243.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN LAND IN CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE, COUNTY OF DUTCHESS, NEW YORK, 71 F. Supp. 363 (E.D.N.Y. 1947)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land Situate in the Village of Farmingdale, D.C., 41 F. . . .

LAMBERT v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION, 71 F. Supp. 509 (E.D.N.Y. 1947)

. . . United States, Petitioner, v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Town of Babylon, County of Suffolk, State of New . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF NEW YORK, 160 F.2d 479 (2d Cir. 1947)

. . . Co., 160 U.S. 668, 685, 16 S.Ct. 427, 40 L.Ed. 576; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Town of . . .

UNITED STATES v. SQUARE FEET OF LAND IN BOSTON, 66 F. Supp. 659 (D. Mass. 1946)

. . . United States v. 6.74 Acres of Land in Dade County, Florida, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 618; United States v. 243.22 . . .

LIBBEY- OWENS- FORD GLASS CO. v. SYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, 154 F.2d 814 (2d Cir. 1946)

. . . Overruling several cases, including United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 878, certiorari . . .

UNITED STATES v. SAN GERONIMO DEVELOPMENT CO. SAN GERONIMO DEVELOPMENT CO. v. UNITED STATES, 154 F.2d 78 (1st Cir. 1946)

. . . Weaver, 1919, 251 U.S. 57, 40 S.Ct. 62, 64 L.Ed. 135; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DEL., 61 F. Supp. 937 (D. Del. 1945)

. . . the Secretary of War in time of war emergency is not even open to judicial inquiry, United States v. 243.22 . . . Judge Frank (United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, 683): “The decision of the . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WIS. STATE OF WISCONSIN v. STIMSON,, 61 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Wis. 1945)

. . . In United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, reported in 129 F.2d 678, 683, the Second Circuit Court of . . .

CATLIN TRUSTEES, v. UNITED STATES, 324 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1945)

. . . S. 679; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F. 2d 678 (C. C. A. 2), cert. denied, 317 U. . . .

SAUCIER v. CRICHTON, 147 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1945)

. . . Sunset Cemetery Co., 7 Cir., 132 F.2d 163; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, D.C., 41 F.Supp. 469 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN INTERESTS IN LAND SITUATE IN FRANKLIN COUNTY, ILL., 58 F. Supp. 739 (E.D. Ill. 1945)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, at page 683 and cases there cited; Bragg . . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, at page 683, and cases there cited; United . . . In United States v. 243.22, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, at page 683, the court in dealing with defenses similar . . .

THOMAS FRENCH SONS, v. INTERNATIONAL BRAID CO., 146 F.2d 735 (1st Cir. 1945)

. . . judgments,” see Crick, The Final Judgment as a Basis for Appeal, 41 Tale L.J. 539; United States v. 243.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN EAST HAMPTON TP. SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y., 61 F. Supp. 362 (E.D.N.Y. 1944)

. . . Judge Moscowitz construes a similar statute in United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, Situate in the . . .

KASISHKE v. BAKER, 144 F.2d 384 (10th Cir. 1944)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678; Gulf Refining Co. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MERCHANTS TRANSFER STORAGE CO. MERCHANTS TRANSFER STORAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 144 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1944)

. . . Montana, 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 194; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, 683, and . . .

UNITED STATES v. CITY OF CHESTER, 144 F.2d 415 (3d Cir. 1944)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, D.C., 43 F.Supp. 561, 567, 568, affirmed 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CATLIN, 142 F.2d 781 (7th Cir. 1944)

. . . United States, 9 Cir., 124 F.2d 959; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678; and . . . The 243.22 Acres of Land case in a measure sustains appellants’ contention, although the judgment there . . .

DADE COUNTY, FLA. v. UNITED STATES, 142 F.2d 230 (5th Cir. 1944)

. . . United States, 1 Cir., 131 F.2d 491, and United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO., 53 F. Supp. 319 (E.D. Mo. 1944)

. . . In the case of United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 129 F.2d 678 (Second Circuit), a question not unlike . . .

ZALKIND v. SCHEINMAN SCHEINMAN GUIDE SYSTEM SUPPLY CO., 139 F.2d 895 (2d Cir. 1943)

. . . Co., 2 Cir., 136 F.2d 621, 625; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, 680; Crick . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS,, 51 F. Supp. 162 (M.D. Pa. 1943)

. . . To the same effect is United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Town of Babylon, etc., 2 Cir., 129 F.2d . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN ADAMS AND CLAY COUNTIES, NEB., 50 F. Supp. 563 (D. Neb. 1943)

. . . United States, 9 Cir., 124 F.2d 959; United States v. 243.22 acres of land, D.C., 43 F.Supp. 561; Id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN WEBSTER PARISH, LA., 50 F. Supp. 712 (W.D. La. 1943)

. . . Certain Parcels of Land, D.C., 40 F.Supp. 436; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land D.C., 41 F.Supp. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARIN, 136 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1943)

. . . United States, 9 Cir., 124 F.2d 959, 964; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678 . . . See further United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678; United States v. . . .

AUDI VISION INC. v. RCA MFG. CO., 136 F.2d 621 (2d Cir. 1943)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, 680. 3 Moore, Federal Practice, 3155. . . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678, 680, certiorari denied Lambert v. . . .

ALPIRN v. HUFFMAN, 49 F. Supp. 337 (D. Neb. 1943)

. . . United States, 9 Cir., 124 F.2d 959; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Village of Farmingdale, . . . Land, More or Less, Situate in City of Oakland, Alameda County, D.C., 37 F.Supp. 297; United States v. 243.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS,, 49 F. Supp. 20 (S.D. Tex. 1943)

. . . Interpreting this rule is the case of United States v. 243.22 acres of land situated in Village of Farmingdale . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND SITUATE IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY,, 48 F. Supp. 177 (E.D.N.Y. 1942)

. . . UNITED STATES v. 243.22 ACRES OF LAND SITUATE IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY . . .

PUERTO RICO RY. LIGHT POWER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 131 F.2d 491 (1st Cir. 1942)

. . . United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 1942, 129 F. 2d 678. We agree with this decision. . . . 356, 37 L.Ed. 194, relied on by the United States, is adequately distinguished in United States v. 243.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ALEXANDER, 47 F. Supp. 900 (W.D. Va. 1942)

. . . Kennesaw Mountain Battlefield Association, 5 Cir., 99 F.2d 830, 834, and United States v. 243.22 acres . . .

HAMMOND v. HULL, 131 F.2d 23 (D.D.C. 1942)

. . . .”; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land in Town of Babylon, Suffolk County, N. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y., 129 F.2d 678 (2d Cir. 1942)

. . . UNITED STATES v. 243.22 ACRES OF LAND IN TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y., et al. No. 349. . . .

FLETCHER v. MAUPIN, 129 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1942)

. . . Llewellyn, 1506 Va. 258, 157 S.E. 809; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land et al., D.C., 43 F.Supp. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, SITUATE IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y., 45 F. Supp. 361 (E.D.N.Y. 1942)

. . . UNITED STATES v. 243.22 ACRES OF LAND, SITUATE IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY . . . See United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, etc., et al., D.C., 43 F.Supp. 561. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, STATE OF NEW YORK, 43 F. Supp. 805 (E.D.N.Y. 1942)

. . . UNITED STATES v. 243.22 ACRES OF LAND IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, STATE . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y., 43 F. Supp. 561 (E.D.N.Y. 1942)

. . . UNITED STATES v. 243.22 ACRES OF LAND IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN VILLAGE OF FARM INGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y., 41 F. Supp. 805 (E.D.N.Y. 1941)

. . . UNITED STATES v. 243.22 ACRES OF LAND IN VILLAGE OF FARM INGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND SITUATE IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY, STATE OF NEW YORK, 41 F. Supp. 469 (E.D.N.Y. 1941)

. . . UNITED STATES v. 243.22 ACRES OF LAND SITUATE IN VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE, TOWN OF BABYLON, SUFFOLK COUNTY . . .

OLDS WHIPPLE, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 75 F.2d 272 (2d Cir. 1935)

. . . company and made an operating profit of $33,120.87; in 1928, an operating profit of $6,048.32; and $6,-243.22 . . .