Cases from cite.case.law:

V. CLEMONS, v. STATE RISK MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND, 870 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . I share the majority opinion’s view that the exclusion in section 284.38, Florida Statutes (1997), does . . . [were not] determined in the final judgment to have caused the harm intentionally.” § 284.38, Fla. . . . transferred to Rule 69H-2.004(5), Florida Administrative Code, creates an exclusion, even if section 284.38 . . . The latter exclusion echoes pertinent language in section 284.38, Florida Statutes (1997). . . . .” § 284.38, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . See § 284.38, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . Section 284.38, Florida Statutes, provides for exclusion from coverage where the officer “has been determined . . . persons, property, or personal rights do not constitute intent to harm as clearly stated in section 284.38 . . . Because the trial court’s application of the exclusion in section 284.38 was error, we REVERSE and REMAND . . .

I. GAMBLE, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 779 F.2d 1509 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 284.38 (emphasis added). . . . Thus, the most reasonable reading of § 284.38 is that the state, through its risk management fund, will . . . In any event, there is surely no overwhelming implication from the text of § 284.38 that the state intended . . . Subsection (l)(a) is the functional equivalent of § 284.38 discussed above. . . .

LEGGETT, v. L. BADGER, w FL L. FL. J. C. FSP, FL., 759 F.2d 1556 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 284.38, providing for the Florida Casualty Insurance Risk Management Trust Fund, there is no state . . .

MEEKER a k a v. R. E. ADDISON a, 586 F. Supp. 216 (S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Additionally, the Court notes that Florida Statute § 284.38, which is entitled “Waiver of sovereign immunity . . . These sections, 284.31 and 284.38, Florida Statutes, specifically abrogate the usual monetary limitations . . . The Shin-holster opinion interprets Florida Statute § 284.38 as excluding constitutional torts from Florida . . . Yet nothing in § 284.38 states anything that can be so construed; as noted above, the section differentiates . . . Fla.Stat. § 284.38. (Emphasis supplied). . . .

B. SHINHOLSTER, v. GRAHAM,, 527 F. Supp. 1318 (N.D. Fla. 1981)

. . . The most significant provision of Chapter 284, Part 2, is Section 284.38 which is entitled “Waiver of . . . Fla.Stat. § 284.38 (1979). . . . Arguably, Section 284.38 could be interpreted, under a very broad construction, to effectively expand . . . The legislative histories of Sections 284.30, 284.31, and, especially 284.38, support this construction . . . [sic] U.S.C., s. 1983 or similar federal statutes. (7) S. 284.38, F.S., is amended to provide that for . . .

N. v., 55 T.C. 501 (T.C. 1970)

. . . Morforde (l,OO0X.'875X.65X.5O)_$284.38 Mr. . . .

SNYDER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 54 F.2d 57 (3d Cir. 1931)

. . . 1925 sales against all of the 1925 purchases and the latest 1924 purchases, disclosing a loss of $10,-284.38 . . .

In MORGAN STROH v. DE CARPENTIER, 26 F.2d 183 (6th Cir. 1928)

. . . D. 413, where $284.38 was owed, and the affidavit stated that the amount was $2,500, and the transaction . . .

In HUGILL, 100 F. 616 (N.D. Iowa 1900)

. . . The firm of Cooper Bros, filed proof of claim in the sum of $284.38, including interest as corrected . . . The firm of Cooper Bros, filed proof of claim in the sum of $284.38, including interest, as corrected . . . They only asked that the mortgage lien be held valid as to $284.38, the amount of the original indebtedness . . .