Cases from cite.case.law:

WASSERSTROM, v. STATE, 21 So. 3d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Stat. s. 286.012. . . . Stat. s. 286.012. . . .

GEORGE L. W. O. v. CITY OF COCOA, FLORIDA, 78 F.3d 494 (11th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 286.012 (West 1995). . . . Section 286.012 speaks only of when a public official may abstain from voting; it does not describe the . . .

KINZER, v. STATE COMMISSION ON ETHICS,, 654 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . in favor of Kinzer. .The Town Attorney advised Kinzer that he had a legal duty to vote under section 286.012 . . . reversed even if the anti-nepotism law had not been partially repealed, given the terms of section 286.012 . . .

H. MOFFITT, v. C. WILLIS,, 459 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 1984)

. . . article III, Florida Constitution; section 11.142, Florida Statutes (1981); and section 286.011 and 286.012 . . .

IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA, v. MONROE COUNTY, 448 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 286.012, Fla.Stat. (1981) provides: No member of any state, county, or municipal governmental . . . He also may abstain as provided by § 286.012, which has been interpreted by the attorney general to require . . .

J. RUFF O v. SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY,, 426 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . found that the organizational meeting of the task force was not subject to chapter 286 and that section 286.012 . . . 286 did apply to the task force and based on the following discussion of the requirements of section 286.012 . . . The issue raised by appellants that most concerns us is whether section 286.012, Florida Statutes, requires . . . The title to chapter 72-311, Laws of Florida (1972), which became section 286.012, reads: AN ACT relating . . . Rayel Corp., 313 So.2d 113 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), the court held that though section 286.012 requires every . . .

KRAUSE v. RENO, a, 366 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . City of Miami in choosing a new police chief was subject to the provisions of Sections 286.011 and 286.012 . . . official acts or is a step in any official decision-making process is subject to Sections 286.011 and 286.012 . . . either of them are subject to the government in the Sunshine Law and subject to Sections 286.011 and 286.012 . . .

G. OLDHAM, Jr. v. F. ROOKS,, 361 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 1978)

. . . Rooks says the statute under attack was in direct conflict with Section 286.012, Florida Statutes (1973 . . . Under Section 286.012, Florida Statutes (1973), he was required to vote because he owned less than 10 . . . Statutes (1973), was impliedly repealed and not revived in 1971 is buttressed by the fact that Section 286.012 . . . A review of Section 286.012 discloses no reference to Section 839.07. . . . unreasonable that Section 839.07, Florida Statutes (1973), would not have been referred to in Section 286.012 . . .

STATE, STATE ATTORNEY, v. KRAUSE,, 47 Fla. Supp. 36 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . pursuant to Chapter 86, Florida Statutes, and for a temporary and permnent injunction pursuant to Sections 286.012 . . . either of them are subject to the Government in the Sunshine Law and subject to Sections 286.011 and 286.012 . . .

CITY OF HALLANDALE, v. RAYEL CORPORATION, a, 313 So. 2d 113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Statutes 286.012, which requires that every member of a governmental board who is present at any meeting . . .

STATE v. J. DINSMORE,, 308 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1975)

. . . Appellant submits that Section 286.012, Florida Statutes, which provides: “Voting requirement at meetings . . .

C. WALBERG v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a, 296 So. 2d 509 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Florida Statute § 286.012, F.S.A., specifically provides that members of governmental bodies are required . . .