Cases from cite.case.law:

HITCH ENTERPRISES, INC. D. v. CIMAREX ENERGY CO., 859 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (W.D. Okla. 2012)

. . . . §§ 287.1-287.15 and/or 52 O.S. § 87.1,] and/or the unitization order and agreement with [p]laintiffs . . . [sections] 287.1-287.15 and also by the creation of drilling and spacing units under ... section 87.1 . . .

In SHARPE, D. v. GE LLC GE, 425 B.R. 620 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2010)

. . . fees and costs in the amount of Seventy Thousand Two Hundred Eighty Seven And 15/100 Dollars ($70, 287.15 . . .

MESA PARTNERS II, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a C., 607 F. Supp. 624 (W.D. Okla. 1985)

. . . . §§ 287.1 through 287.15 (1981). . . .

MOORE v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Y. R. L. E. Jr., 566 F. Supp. 534 (E.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . essentially that the PBGC’s determination that he is entitled to a deferred vested monthly benefit of $287.15 . . .

TRANSOK PIPELINE COMPANY, v. DARKS,, 565 F.2d 1150 (10th Cir. 1977)

. . . . §§ 81-287.15, is designed to regulate the oil and gas industry. . . .

REPUBLIC NATURAL GAS CO. v. BAKER, 197 F.2d 647 (10th Cir. 1952)

. . . . §§ 287.1-287.15; and see Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 204 Okl. 543, 231 P.2d 997. . . .

Co. v., 8 B.T.A. 41 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . opposite the respective amounts: March 31, 1917 $103,287.15 June 30, 1917— 103,287.15 Oct. 1, 1917_ 103, 287.15 . . .

C. E. SCHAFF, RECEIVER OF MISSOURI, KANSAS TEXAS RAILWAY CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 55 Ct. Cl. 405 (Ct. Cl. 1920)

. . . transportation of mails, from July 1,1907, so as to be at the rate of $26,963.38 per annum, being $287.15 . . .

v., 20 F. 376 (C.C.E.D. Mo. 1884)

. . . c his demand of what is due on the ice, $1,030.50, and his $287.15 on the second count. . . .