Cases from cite.case.law:

METROPOLITAN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. v. AMERICAN HOME REALTY NETWORK, INC. v., 18 F. Supp. 3d 662 (D. Md. 2013)

. . . See Compendium II of Copyright Office Practices § 308.02 (“The collective work as a whole is often a . . .

M. DRAKE C. S. v. A. FILKO, A. V., 724 F.3d 426 (3d Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 18.2-308.02; Wash. Rev.Code § 9.41.070; W. Va. Code § 61-7-4; Wis. Stat. § 175.60; Wyo. Stat. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. HOLTHAUS, Jr., 437 F. Supp. 2d 932 (N.D. Iowa 2006)

. . . Hanrahan also spent $308.02 in out-of-pocket expenses as a result of Defendant’s lies. . . .

SKF USA SKF S. A. v., 28 Ct. Int'l Trade 170 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . of a judgment or injunction; a stay must be applied for and granted.” 20 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 308.02 . . .

SKF USA INC. SKF S. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 316 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . of a judgment or injunction; a stay must be applied for and granted.” 20 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 308.02 . . .

CEMS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 59 Fed. Cl. 168 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . material designated by FP-96 section 308 for Roadway Aggregate Method 2 is designated in FP-96 subsection 308.02 . . .

S. ROBERTS, v. S. BOWERSOX,, 61 F. Supp. 2d 896 (E.D. Mo. 1999)

. . . that instruction does not prevent a defendant from also using a converse instruction based on MAI-CR 308.02 . . .

J. D. HEDIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. FOR ITS OWN USE AND FOR THE USE OF FISCHBACH MOORE, ITS SUB- CONTRACTOR v. THE UNITED STATES, 171 Ct. Cl. 70 (Ct. Cl. 1965)

. . . temporary roads_ 3,347.44 Temporary heating and snow removal_ 49, 277.30 Home office overhead_ 101, 308.02 . . .