The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES

Chapter 316
STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 316.75

316.75 School crossing guards.—The Department of Transportation shall adopt uniform guidelines for the training of school crossing guards. Each local governmental entity administering a school crossing guard program shall provide a training program for school crossing guards according to the uniform guidelines. Successful completion of the training program shall be required of each school guard except:

(1) A person who received equivalent training during employment as a law enforcement officer.

(2) A person who receives less than $5,000 in annual compensation in a county with a population of less than 75,000.

(3) A student who serves in a school patrol.

School crossing guard training programs may be made available to nonpublic schools upon contract.

History.—s. 2, ch. 92-194; s. 42, ch. 97-190.

Note.—Former s. 234.302.

F.S. 316.75 on Google Scholar

F.S. 316.75 on Casetext

Amendments to 316.75

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 316.75

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 316.75.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CHO, v. KOAM MEDICAL SERVICES P. C., 524 F. Supp. 2d 202 (E.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . reflects, according to Choi, a reduction of Choi’s total hours across the board by 10 percent — from 316.75 . . .

In GENGLER, v., 278 B.R. 146 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2002)

. . . that she faces a monthly deficit in her household budget of Three Hundred Sixteen and 75/100 dollars ($316.75 . . . obligations, the Plaintiff still shows a monthly deficit of Three Hundred Sixteen and 75/100 dollars ($316.75 . . .

BISCHOFF v. OSCEOLA COUNTY,, 35 F. Supp. 2d 1358 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . with violating two provisions of the Florida Uniform Traffic Control Law, Fla.Stat. chs. 316.001 - 316.75 . . .

AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, v. D. MANESS, L. C. L. C. F. S. B. UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY COMPANY, v. D. MANESS, L. C. L. C. F. S. B. UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY COMPANY v. D. MANESS, L. C. L. C. F. S. B., 101 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 1996)

. . . letter indicate a total of $571,633.91; the lower court opinion states that the total amount was $679,-316.75 . . .

R. MENKARELL, v. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, 463 F.2d 88 (3d Cir. 1972)

. . . . § 316.75. . . .

CHICAGO AND WESTERN INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, CHICAGO AND WESTERN INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY,, 419 F.2d 936 (7th Cir. 1969)

. . . agreed to and, in accordance with Covenant 5, paid its user proportion (46.01%) of that cost, or $15,-316.75 . . .

THE SAGITTARIUS, 57 F.2d 756 (D. Mass. 1932)

. . . the libelant did other work on the vessel and furnished other material for which he made a eharge of $316.75 . . .