The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . who is not disinterested is within the discretion of the bankruptcy court.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶328.05 . . .
. . . applied in the absence of actual injury or prejudice to a debtor’s estate. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 328.05 . . .
. . . See, e.g., §§ 206.205, 322.34, 328.05, 328.07, Fla. . . .
. . . See In re: Granite Partners LP, 219 B.R. 22, 34 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1998); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 328.05[ . . .
. . . See In re: Granite Partners LP, 219 B.R. 22, 34 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1998); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 328.05[ . . .
. . . vessel using a false and fictitious name and a false and fictitious address in violation of section 328.05 . . . is whether the forfeiture of the vessel, valued at approximately $60,000, for violation of section 328.05 . . . Therefore, section 328.05(3)(c) must be construed in pari materia with sections 932.701-932.704. . . . Thus, this leads us to the conclusion that the forfeiture provision of section 328.05(3)(e) was enacted . . . Section 328.05(3)(c) provides in part: (3) It is unlawful: (c) To use a false or fictitious name, give . . .
. . . 328(c) but instead is] within the discretion of the bankruptcy court.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 328.05 . . . in the absence of actual injury or prejudice to the debtor’s estate.” 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 328.05 . . .
. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 328.05[3], at 328-32 (15th ed. rev.1997)(“Collier”); Robin E. . . . In re GHR Energy Corp., 60 B.R. 52, 68 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.1985); see generally 3 Collier ¶ 328.05[4], at . . .
. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 328.05[2], Given this background, we may focus on the ease at hand. . . .
. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 328.05[2], Given this background, we may focus on the ease at hand. . . .
. . . Like subsection 328.07(3), subsection 328.05(3)(c) does not include the word “knowingly”; however, the . . .
. . . In this appeal, the DNR argues that section 328.05(3)(c) does not require a showing of a collateral crime . . . We agree that section 328.05(3)(c) does not require proof of a collateral crime in order to mandate forfeiture . . . This is because section 328.05(3)(c) must be construed in pari materia with the general forfeiture statute . . . to hold that these intentionally false statements in registering the boat did not contravene section 328.05 . . . in a bill of sale or sworn statement of ownership or otherwise commit a fraud in any application. § 328.05 . . . I agree that section 328.05(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), does not require a showing of a collateral . . .
. . . is whether the proof at trial was sufficient to sustain defendant’s felony conviction under Section 328.05 . . . and one felony count of fraudulently obtaining a certificate of registration in violation of section 328.05 . . . on appeal, but the only meritorious issue concerns the defendant’s conviction for violating section 328.05 . . . By its plain language, section 328.05(2) is aimed at combatting fraud against third parties. . . . Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction for violating section 328.05(2), Florida Statutes (1979) is reversed . . .
. . . acres 267.00 Tract G-600 247.06 acres 18,190.90 Total....... 62,425.25 C/A 537 Tract E-449 5.51 acres 328.05 . . .
. . . , viz: (а) April 1, 1918: Plaintiff filed income and excess-profits tax return, tax liability_$260, 328.05 . . .