Cases from cite.case.law:

HAWKES CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 782 F.3d 994 (8th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 331.10,” which meant their administrative ■ remedies were exhausted. See 33 C.F.R. § 331.12. . . .

BELLE COMPANY, L. L. C. L. L. C. v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 761 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 331.10, 331.12. . . .

KUNAKNANA, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, v., 23 F. Supp. 3d 1063 (D. Alaska 2014)

. . . . § 331.10(b) ("If [the Corps] determines that [an administrative] appeal has merit, the final Corps . . .

HAWKES CO. INC. Co. LPF LLC, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 963 F. Supp. 2d 868 (D. Minn. 2013)

. . . . §§ 331.10, 331.12. . . . remedies have not been exhausted for APA purposes until a final permit decision is reached under § 331.10 . . .

MEHAFFY, v. UNITED STATES,, 98 Fed. Cl. 604 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . Section 331.10 provides the criteria for issuing a final Corps decision when a permit applicant administratively . . . Id. § 331.10(a). . . . . § 331.10. See id. § 331.12. . . . exhausted all administrative remedies when a final Corps permit decision is made in accordance with § 331.10 . . . See 33 C.F.R. §§ 331.10, 331.12; cf. Bayou Des Families Dev. Corp. v. . . .

SACKETT v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY L., 622 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . See 33 C.F.R § 331.10; 5 U.S.C. § 704. . . .

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 70 Fed. Cl. 745 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . . § 331.10 (1989). . . .

RIPPLIN SHOALS LAND COMPANY, LLC v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Z., 440 F.3d 1038 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 331.12, 331.10. . . .

BACCARAT FREMONT DEVELOPERS, LLC, a v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS A. O K., 425 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 331.10. . . .

BAY- HOUSTON TOWING COMPANY, INC. J. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 58 Fed. Cl. 462 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . . § 331.10 (2002) ("The final Corps decision on a permit application is the initial decision to issue . . .

OZARK SOCIETY v. F. MELCHER, E., 229 F. Supp. 2d 896 (E.D. Ark. 2002)

. . . . § 331.10. . Id. . See, e.g., Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. . . .

BROOME, v. BIONDI, BIONDI, v. DEMOU, BIONDI, v. DEMOU,, 17 F. Supp. 2d 230 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . hours 50% reduction in travel time 549.80 hours allowed $140,199.00 549.80 hours x $255/hr = Mark Smith 331.10 . . .

P. ZACCONE Sr. M. v. AMERICAN RED CROSS,, 872 F. Supp. 457 (N.D. Ohio 1994)

. . . from doing those things which such a [professional] would not do. 3 Ohio Civil Jury Instructions, § 331.10 . . .

In A. CRABTREE, a k a, 56 B.R. 42 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1985)

. . . Pine 3.01 331.10 4/2/85 A. C. Emery 2.5 337.50 4/3/85 A. C. Emery 4/10/85 S. R. . . .

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a v. USAFORM HAIL POOL, INC. a, 465 F. Supp. 478 (M.D. Fla. 1979)

. . . Advances to Limited totalling $63,-331.10. . . .

A. R. AHMAD v. BURKE, s s W. Ms. J. H. L., 436 F. Supp. 1307 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . . § 331.10 (West Supp.1977), which authorizes the Board “to enter into contracts on behalf of the Commonwealth . . .

UNITED STATES v. GIRAGOSSIANTZ, 488 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1973)

. . . . § 331.10 (1966), which recites in part, § 331.10 Security policies. . . . The claim fails because 6 C.F.R. § 331.10, the whole of which is entitled “Security policies,” does not . . .

FIRST NAT. BANK OF NASHVILLE v. NATIONAL SURETY CO., 130 F. 401 (6th Cir. 1904)

. . . aggregated $631.10, and were properly entered on the scratcher, but posted in their ledger account as $331.10 . . .