The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXV
AVIATION

Chapter 333
AIRPORT ZONING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 333.02

333.02 Airport hazards and uses of land in airport vicinities contrary to public interest.—

(1) It is hereby found that an airport hazard endangers the lives and property of users of the airport and of occupants of land in its vicinity and also, if of the obstruction type, in effect reduces the size of the area available for the taking off, maneuvering, or landing of aircraft, thus tending to destroy or impair the utility of the airport and the public investment therein. It is further found that certain activities and uses of land in the immediate vicinity of airports as enumerated in s. 333.03(2) are not compatible with normal airport operations, and may, if not regulated, also endanger the lives of the participants, adversely affect their health, or otherwise limit the accomplishment of normal activities. Accordingly, it is hereby declared:

(a) That the creation or establishment of an airport hazard and the incompatible use of land in airport vicinities are public nuisances and injure the community served by the airport in question;

(b) That it is therefore necessary in the interest of the public health, public safety, and general welfare that the creation or establishment of airport hazards and incompatible land uses be prevented; and

(c) That this should be accomplished, to the extent legally possible, by the exercise of the police power, without compensation.

(2) It is further declared that the limitation of land uses incompatible with normal airport operations, the prevention of the creation or establishment of airport hazards, and the elimination, removal, alteration, mitigation, or marking and lighting of existing airport hazards are public purposes for which political subdivisions may raise and expend public funds and acquire land or property interests therein, or air rights thereover.

History.—s. 2, ch. 23079, 1945; s. 2, ch. 88-356; s. 71, ch. 90-136.

F.S. 333.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 333.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 333.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 333.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 333.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MILLER INVESTMENT TRUST v. MORGAN STANLEY CO. LLC KPMG, 308 F. Supp. 3d 411 (D. Mass. 2018)

. . . . § 78j-1(b)(1)(B) ; AU §§ 110.02, 316.13, .16; 317.10, .11, .16, .19-.20; 333.02-.04; see also TAC ¶ . . . AU § 333.02. . . . TAC ¶ 111; AU §§ 333.02-.04. . . .

In OSG SECURITIES LITIGATION, 62 F. Supp. 3d 353 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . See Auditing Standards Board’s Statement of Auditing Standards ("AS”) No. 85, § 333.02 (”[R]epresentations . . .

SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III QP, L. P. L. P. L. P. L. P. L. P. TE L. P. ZS EDU L. P. MRMP LLC WHI QP, LP N. A. S. LP LP, v. DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU CPA, LTD. LLP ABC, 33 F. Supp. 3d 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . (AU § 333.02). . . . unencumbered nature of ChinaCast’s term deposits violated “at least” GAAS standards AU §§ 150.02, 330.28 and 333.02 . . . s financial statements on a consolidated ba- ‘ sis, in violation of GAAS standards AU §§ 150.02 and 333.02 . . . This “red flag” would have been exposed if DTTC had complied with GAAS standards §§ 150.02, 330.28 and 333.02 . . .

In SMILEY DENTAL ARLINGTON, PLLC,, 503 B.R. 680 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . professional association programs so that the ombudsman would be redundant. 3 CollieR on Bankruptcy ¶ 333.02 . . .

NEW MEXICO STATE INVESTMENT COUNCIL, No. v. ERNST YOUNG LLP, J. A. E. F. L., 641 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . See e.g., PCAOB AU §§ 319.69, 333.02. . . .

In NORTH SHORE HEMATOLOGY- ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P. C., 400 B.R. 7 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Valley Health Sys., 381 B.R. at 762; See also 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 333.02, at 333-34 (Alan N. . . .

In VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, a, 381 B.R. 756 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 333.02, at 333-4 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . .

In PARMALAT SECURITIES LITIGATION, 501 F. Supp. 2d 560 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . But GAAS, AU Section 333.02, provides that “representations from management are part of the evidential . . . Plaintiffs claim that this does not get Deloitte USA off the hook because AU Section 333.02 permits an . . . Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Codification of Statements on Accounting Standards, AU § 333.02 . . . AU § 333.02. . . . .

In WORLDCOM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 352 F. Supp. 2d 472 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . AU § 333.02. . . .

PONCE, v. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 345 F.3d 722 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1, § 333.02 (American . . .

In CBI HOLDING COMPANY, INC. v. LLP,, 247 B.R. 341 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . (GAAS, AU § 333.02). 79. E & Y’s Audit Manual instructed its auditors to search for irregularities. . . .

In CENDANT CORPORATION LITIGATION, 60 F. Supp. 2d 354 (D.N.J. 1999)

. . . AU § 333.02 (1998); AU § 333.02 (1997). . . .

In FOERTSCH, 167 B.R. 555 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1994)

. . . Consequently, the Bank obtained a judgment against the Debtors on April 6, 1993, in the amount of $146,-333.02 . . .

TEST v. BROWARD COUNTY,, 616 So. 2d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . As amended, section 333.02, Florida Statutes (1990) provides: (1) It is hereby found that an airport . . .

NEW PORT LARGO, INC. a H. D. v. MONROE COUNTY, a NEW PORT LARGO, INC. H. D. v. MONROE COUNTY, a, 985 F.2d 1488 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 333.02 ("Airport hazards contrary to public interest”); id. § 333.-07(2)(a) (variances must not be . . .

L. COMEAU L. G. v. RUPP C. F. Co. Co. a a, 810 F. Supp. 1172 (D. Kan. 1992)

. . . also AICPA Professional Auditing Standards, Codification of Statements on Auditing Statements, AU § 333.02 . . .

M. G. WARING, E. P. v. J. PETERSON, Jr. L. R., 137 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . Section 333.02 categorizes creation or establishment of an airport hazard as a public nuisance and an . . .