Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 376.83 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 376.83 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 376.83

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXVIII
NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION, AND USE
Chapter 376
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE PREVENTION AND REMOVAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 376.83
376.83 Violation; penalties.
(1) It is a violation of ss. 376.77-376.85, and it is prohibited for any person, to knowingly make any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained, or to falsify, tamper with, or knowingly render inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under ss. 376.77-376.85, or by any permit, rule, or order issued under this chapter or chapter 403.
(2) Any person who willfully commits a violation specified in subsection (1) is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by 6 months in jail, or by both, for each offense. Each day during any portion of which such violation occurs constitutes a separate offense.
History.s. 7, ch. 97-277; s. 6, ch. 98-75.

F.S. 376.83 on Google Scholar

F.S. 376.83 on Casetext

Amendments to 376.83


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 376.83
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S376.83 1 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - CERT DOC REQD BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT ACT - M: F
S376.83 2 - FRAUD - FALSIFY TAMPER DEV USED IN BROWNFIELD REDEVEL - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In T. BOWEN M., 349 B.R. 814 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2005)

. . . Debtors withdrew their objection to a $376.83 claim (see Doc. . . .

O. ENEJE, v. ASHCROFT,, 67 F. App'x 901 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . On May 1, 1996, Plaintiff received a second check, in the amount of $376.83, from the BOP to account . . .

ALONSO v. FERNANDEZ, FERNANDEZ v. ALONSO, 379 So. 2d 685 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs of $376.83 and $767.50 in PIP benefits, $2,180 on the . . .

In NATIONAL DEPARTMENT STORES, DEMOV v. NATIONAL DEPARTMENT STORES, SAME v. NATIONAL DEPARTMENT STORES,, 93 F.2d 123 (3d Cir. 1937)

. . . Incidentally, he was also allowed $376.83 in expense money to accompany this allowance. . . .

HALL v. AETNA CASUALTY SURETY CO., 89 F.2d 885 (2d Cir. 1937)

. . . In March, 1928, De Witt, whose balance with the bank was then only $376.83, arranged with Du Bois to . . .

HALL v. MANUFACTURERS TRUST CO., 18 F. Supp. 173 (S.D.N.Y. 1937)

. . . the balance in the personal account of DeWitt in the Germantown National Bank on March 1, 1928 was $376.83 . . .