Cases from cite.case.law:

N. GANSON, Jr. v. CITY OF MARATHON,, 222 So. 3d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Landowners’ property practically useless, the Landowners are entitled to compensation”); see also § 380.08 . . .

MONROE COUNTY, a a v. AMBROSE,, 866 So. 2d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 380.08, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that the government cannot adopt a rule or regulation . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY, a v. TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES LIMITED, n k a a a, 652 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Although section 380.08, Florida Statutes (1973), would have allowed Taylor Woodrow Homes to challenge . . . Whether this dedication requirement was an excessive regulation under the constitution and under section 380.08 . . .

REAHARD P. v. LEE COUNTY,, 30 F.3d 1412 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . Specifically, the Reahards invoked sections 163.3194(4)(b) and 380.08 of the Florida Statutes, Article . . .

BATTAGLIA PROPERTIES, LTD. v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION,, 629 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 380.08(1), Fla.Stat. (1991). In Snyder v. . . .

REAHARD P. v. LEE COUNTY,, 968 F.2d 1131 (11th Cir. 1992)

. . . .-3194(4)(b) and 380.08 of the Florida Statutes, under Article X, Section 6 of the Florida Constitution . . .

COSCAN FLORIDA, INC. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY,, 586 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that after specifying the reasons for denying a . . . is apparent to us that he made all the specific recommendations he could in compliance with section 380.08 . . .

FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION,, 522 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . .-53(1) and the laws implemented are 380.07(3), 380.08(3), and 120.57(l)(b). .Rules 27G-1.06(2) and 27G . . .

JOINT VENTURES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 519 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Additionally, Section 380.08(1), Florida Statutes, explicitly provides that no government agency may . . .

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS v. LUJAN,, 26 Fla. Supp. 2d 190 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . Section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes. . . .

FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC. v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION, 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 156 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . Section 380.08(2), Florida Statutes (1985). E.G., Londono v. . . .

FOX, v. TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, v. FLORIDA LAND AND WATER ADJUDICATORY COMMISSION,, 442 So. 2d 221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes requires that a governmental agency denying a development permit . . . Under Section 380.08(1), Florida Statutes, the governmental agency may not issue an order that is unduly . . . The Recommended Order indicates that the hearing officer interpreted Section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes . . . restriction on the developer’s use of his land and not a taking of property in violation of Section 380.08 . . . Section 380.08(3), Florida Statutes: (3) If any governmental agency denies a development permit under . . .

GRAHAM, v. ESTUARY PROPERTIES, INC., 399 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 1981)

. . . development which would make it possible for Estuary to receive the permit, as required by section 380.08 . . . does not indicate an intention to adopt the planning council’s changes in order to comply with section 380.08 . . . facts as found by the agency constituted a taking and therefore violated the constitution or section 380.08 . . . Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission with instructions to that commission to comply with section 380.08 . . .

R. ALBRECHT C. G. Jr. v. STATE O D. J. Jr. A. D. W. Jr., 407 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . action, and remanded the case solely for specification by the agency of the matters required by section 380.08 . . . chapter 380 applied to the permit proceedings in the present case, but the principles embodied in section 380.08 . . . Section 380.08(1) says no more than that. . . . Section 380.08(1), Florida Statutes (1972). . . .

ESTUARY PROPERTIES, INC. v. O D. ASKEW, A. L. A. D., 381 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . F.S. 380.08, provides in part that: “(1) Nothing in this chapter authorizes any governmental agency to . . . Constitution, Article I, Section 9 and Article X, Section 6 of the Florida Constitution, and Section 380.08 . . . petitioner for the taking of the mangrove acreage lying below the salina, as contemplated by F.S.' 380.08 . . . denial of such rights violates the United States and Florida Constitutions and Sections 380.06(12) and 380.08 . . . Had they done so the provisions of F.S. 380.08(1) would have been activated and this entire proceeding . . .

CROSS KEY WATERWAYS v. O D. ASKEW CITY OF KEY WEST v. O D. ASKEW CITY OF KEY WEST v. O D. ASKEW, 351 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 380.08(1). . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY, a v. BEKER PHOSPHATE CORPORATION, a a, 322 So. 2d 655 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Florida Statutes 380.06(8), 380.08, and 380.07 (2). . . .

RESTHAVEN MEMORIAL PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES, 155 F. Supp. 539 (W.D. Ky. 1957)

. . . .-34; March 14, 1952, $12.45; Total, $380.08. 11. . . . Memorial Park and Cemetery Association, recover of the defendant, United States of America, the sum of $380.08 . . .

E. GREEN v. ORION SHIPPING AND TRADING CO. Co. Co., 139 F. Supp. 431 (D. Md. 1956)

. . . During 1953 libellant earned $6,922.20 from respondent and $380.08 from others, a total of $7,300.38. . . .

In MICHAELIS LINDEMAN, 196 F. 718 (S.D.N.Y. 1912)

. . . to pay to the receiver in bankruptcy herein the sum of $380.89, less collection charges (i. e., net $380.08 . . .