Cases from cite.case.law:

COLUNGA, v. G. YOUNG G. s, 722 F. Supp. 1479 (W.D. Mich. 1989)

. . . agencies require in order to insure that all wages reflected in this opinion, totalling $11,925.20 ($10,-425.20 . . .

HADI, v. W. HORN,, 830 F.2d 779 (7th Cir. 1987)

. . . A.R. 839 was superseded by IDC Rule 425.20 on August 1, 1984; Rule 425.20 does not contain any reference . . .

MARSHALL, v. LOCAL LODGE, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL- CIO, 509 F. Supp. 90 (D. Md. 1981)

. . . . § 425.20 (1980). . . .

RHODIA, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 546 F.2d 898 (C.C.P.A. 1976)

. . . Appellant claims that NMG should be classified as a mono-methyl-monoamine under TSUS item 425.20 in accordance . . . The court concluded that NMG was such a derivative, classifiable under item 425.20, and overruled the . . . The court stated that the monoamines described in item 425.20 “can only be those compounds in which the . . . The Customs Court held that NMG, being an alkanolamine, is not included within the scope of item 425.20 . . . The exclusion of alkanolamines from item 425.20 is also supported by the legislative history. . . .

v., 64 C.C.P.A. 39 (C.C.P.A. 1976)

. . . Appellant claims that NMG should be classified as a mono-methyl-monoamine under TSUS item 425.20 in accordance . . . The court concluded that NMG was such a derivative, classifiable under item 425.20, and overruled the . . . The court stated that the monoamines described in item 425.20 “can only be those compounds in which the . . . The Customs Court held that NMG, being an alkanolamine, is not included within the scope of item 425.20 . . . The exclusion of alkanolamines from item 425.20 is also supported by the legislative history. . . .

RHODIA, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 411 F. Supp. 778 (Cust. Ct. 1976)

. . . Generally speaking, it was wrong to regard the language of item 425.20 as indicating the existence of . . . As a result, I am persuaded that the monoamines set out in item 425.20 can only be those compounds in . . . Item 425.20 of the TSUS. . Item 425.52 of the TSUS. . . . .

v., 76 Cust. Ct. 31 (Cust. Ct. 1976)

. . . Generally speaking, it was wrong to regard the language of item 425.20 as indicating the existence of . . . As a result, I am persuaded that the monoamines set out in item 425.20 can only be those compounds in . . . Plaintiff moved for Judgment on the pleadings and defendant cross-moved for summary Judgment: Item 425.20 . . .

v., 69 Cust. Ct. 19 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . Plaintiff claims classification pursuant to item 425.20 of the TSUS providing for “mono-, di-, and tri . . . For the above reasons we hold that the importations are properly classifiable pursuant to item 425.20 . . .

BROWN v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO., 59 F. Supp. 721 (D.N.J. 1943)

. . . The former was in the face amount of $10,000, and the premium thereon of $425.20 was payable annually . . .