The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 440.01, et seq., the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq., the Americans with . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01 et seq. See Florida Ins. Guar. Ass’n, Inc. v. Revoredo, 698 So.2d 890, 891-92 (Fla. Ct. . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-.60. (Id.). . . . Stat. §§ 440.01-.60, “ ‘protects workers and compensates them for injuries in the workplace, without . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01 et seq. See Florida Ins. Guar. Ass’n, Inc. v. . . .
. . . states that the trial court found that Lov-ering was a statutory employee “as defined in Florida Statute 440.01 . . .
. . . Stat. 440.01, et seq., ‘“protects workers and compensates them for injuries in the workplace, without . . .
. . . See generally §§ 440.01-440.60, Fla. Stat. (2008); Bakerman v. . . .
. . . See § 440.01. . . .
. . . the law we never cease to probe — employer immunity under Florida Workers’ Compensation Law, sections 440.01 . . . However, section 440.01 also contains several well understood, express exceptions to employer immunity . . .
. . . of the insured, who was statutorily immune from suit under the Workers’ Compensation Law, sections 440.01 . . .
. . . See generally §§ 440.01-440.60, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-440.60. . . .
. . . conditions solely personal to the claimant does not meet the statutory definition of injury in section 440.01 . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-440.60, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the Florida Workers Compensation Act’s, Florida Statute Annotated §§ 440.01 . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-440.60. Id. Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed Count II on November 30, 1998. (Doe. 20). . . .
. . . as an employee of the newspaper’s publisher for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Law, Section 440.01 . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-440.60. . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-440.60. . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-.60, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-440.60 (1987). . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-440.60 (West 1981 & Supp.1986) (hereinafter “Florida Act”). . . .
. . . We believe, however,' that the plain language of section 440.01 [sic] and 440.11(1) precludes any further . . .
. . . Sullivan, 509 So.2d 268, 271 (Fla.1987), the supreme court stated that sections 440.01 and 440.11(1) . . .
. . . conditions solely personal to the claimant does not meet the statutory definition of injury in section 440.01 . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-440.60 (West 1981), and the Feres doctrine, see Feres v. . . .
. . . conditions solely personal to the claimant does not meet the statutory definition of injury in section 440.01 . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01 to 440.60, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . .
. . . We believe, however, that the plain language of sections 440.01 and 440.11(1) precludes any further explanation . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01 —440.60 (1985 & 1986), as a result of the accident. . . .
. . . . §§ 440.01-.60, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . .
. . . Section 440.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (1975). The holding in Atlas Iron and Metal Co. v. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. particularly whether its exclusivity provisions barred recovery. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., and the question of whether it provides the exclusive remedy for the plaintiff-appellant . . .
. . . . § 440.01(11) (1965), F.S.A. . . .
. . . fewer than three employees, Stevens was not required under the Florida Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 440.01 . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. These Acts are substantially different from the Louisiana Act. . . .
. . . Sec. 440.01 et seq., 440.09(3), F.S.A. . . . .
. . . Florida Statutes, Section 440.01 et seq., F.S.A. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . . Sec. 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. The Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. from a single accident for which compensation was paid until the latter part of 1951 . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. 16. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., the beneficent purpose the legislature intended it to have. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq.], alleging essentially that he received an injury by accident arising out of and in . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. for relief on account of the injury had there been no disease involved, but the injury . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq.) for relief had there been no disease involved, and the injury aggravates or accelerates . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. for an injury she received in the course of her employment. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., the petitioners, bring this proceeding in certio-rari to review an order of the Florida . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., the language of the court on the subject of trauma seems apposite. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. to the situation here presented has been raised. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., alleged that plaintiff had been directed to take a coffee-break of fifteen minutes . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. On February 27, 1957, Donald S. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq.]” (emphasis supplied). . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., that it insufficiently alleged the relationship of the parties, did not show a breach . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. is based on this injury. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., does not make industry the insurer of the lives of its employees and we cannot do . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. Povia Bros. Farms v. Velez, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 103; Blount v. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. The total amount of such compensation paid was stipulated to be $1,219.50. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. and, in doubtful cases, resolved such doubts in favor of the claimant. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., therefore, we offer no comment on it. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. (See Lyng v. Rao, Fla., 72 So.2d 53.) . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq. This is commonly referred to in the books as the “going and coming” rule. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., and owned jointly their tools and equipment. . . .
. . . insurance carrier, had a direct liability under the Compensation Act, Florida Statutes Annotated §§ 440.01 . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., with the exceptions of domestics as noted above. . . .
. . . correctly disposed of by the order of the deputy commissioner awarding further compensation herein: “Sec. 440.01 . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq.; that they, having received money from the insurance carrier,- could bring the suits . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., against the Naranja Rock Company, herein called Naranja, and Dawal Farms, Inc., herein . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., provides -the exclusive remedy for the minor to recover damages for his injury. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., regarding the extent to which payments made in advance of a compensation award should . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., “since none of the defendants are (sic) third parties as contemplated by the Workmen . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., and the employer and .the compensation carrier controverted the claim. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq.], as an injury ‘by accident,’ and a literal showing of an ‘accident’ such as a slip . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., as construed by the cases of LeViness v. . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., the defendant contending that the evidence showed, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff . . .
. . . . § 440.01 et seq., as requiring, that an injury “by accident” proceed from an unexpected cause. . . .
. . . judgment upholding an award of compensation granted pursuant to our Workmen’s Compensation Law, Sec. 440.01 . . .