Cases from cite.case.law:

MARIN, v. INFINITY AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY,, 239 So. 3d 751 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 447.15 (2018). . . .

RAYMOND, v. AVECTUS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC,, 213 F. Supp. 3d 928 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

. . . . § 447.15 and Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 400.111b(14)). . . .

TAYLOR v. LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS,, 7 F. Supp. 3d 641 (M.D. La. 2013)

. . . . § 447.15. . . . deductible, coinsurance or copayment required by the plan to be paid by the individual.” 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 447.15. . . . Id. at 281; 42 C.F.R. § 447.15. . . .

R. WRIGHT, v. H. SMITH, M. D. P. C., 641 F. Supp. 2d 536 (W.D. Va. 2009)

. . . . § 447.15 (2008); Va.Code Ann. § 32.1-317 (2004 Repl. Vol.); see also McAmis v. . . .

MILLER, v. GORSKI WLADYSLAW ESTATE Jr. Jr. v. v., 547 F.3d 273 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 447.15. . . .

BEEKER, v. OLSZEWSKI, 415 F. Supp. 2d 734 (E.D. Mich. 2006)

. . . . §§ 447.15, 447.53 by denying poor recipients access to Medicaid services due to their inability to . . . The plaintiffs argue that 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396a(a)(14) and 1396o(e) and 42 C.F.R. §§ 447.15 and 447.53(e . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 (stating that “the provider may not deny services to any eligible individual on . . .

GRIER, v. M. D. GOETZ, Jr., 402 F. Supp. 2d 876 (M.D. Tenn. 2005)

. . . . §§ 447.15, 447.58 (prohibiting co-payments for certain individuals and permitting only “nominal” co-payments . . . See 42 C.F.R. §§ 447.15, 447.53. . . .

SPECTRUM HEALTH CONTINUING CARE GROUP, v. ANNA MARIE BOWLING IRREVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE, 410 F.3d 304 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 447.15, unquestionably admits of this possibility. . . . letter conveys to me, at least, is that the agency which adopted the regulation codified at 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . . . § 447.15. . . . specifically that the Medicaid amount is payment in full. 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(25)(C); 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . . program to “providers who accept, as payment in full, the amounts paid by the agency.” 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . . providers who accept, as payment in full, the amounts paid by the [state Medicaid agency].” 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . .

SCHOTT, v. OLSZEWSKI,, 401 F.3d 682 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . See 42 C.F.R § 447.15 (requiring states to- limit participation in Medicaid to providers who accept the . . .

SPECTRUM HEALTH CONTINUING CARE GROUP, v. ANNA MARIE BOWLING IRREVOCABLE TRUST,, 336 F. Supp. 2d 697 (W.D. Mich. 2004)

. . . . § 447.15 (“A State plan must provide that the Medicaid agency must limit participation in the Medicaid . . . “Under § 447.15 [the ‘payment in full’ regulation], the provider is limited to the amount paid by the . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 (state plans may require an individual to pay a “deductible, coinsurance, or copayment . . .

LIZER v. EAGLE AIR MED CORPORATION,, 308 F. Supp. 2d 1006 (D. Ariz. 2004)

. . . . § 447.15. . . . deductible, coinsurance or copayment required by the plan to be paid by the individual.” 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 447.15. . . .

ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICTS, a v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED,, 79 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (W.D. Wash. 1999)

. . . services under Medicare and Medicaid and have accepted reimbursement “as payment in full.” 42 CFR § 447.15 . . .

McAMIS, v. O. WALLACE, 980 F. Supp. 181 (W.D. Va. 1997)

. . . . § 447.15 (1996); Va.CodeAnn. § 32.1-317(1997). . . . would have been liable for these amounts if Medicaid had not paid her expenses or because 42' C.F.R. § 447.15 . . . deductible, coinsurance, or copayment required by the plan to be paid by the individual.” 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . .

ROZEMA, v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC V. MALEK, v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC, S. C. HALIDA, a v. THE MARSHFIELD CLINIC, S. C., 174 F.R.D. 425 (W.D. Wis. 1997)

. . . . § 447.15; Wis. . . .

BARNEY v. HOLZER CLINIC, LTD., 110 F.3d 1207 (6th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 447.15 (“A State plan must provide that the Medicaid agency must limit participation in the Medicaid . . .

THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, v. DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 693 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 447.15 (1995); § 409.907(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1989). . . . One of the requirements of the federal Medicaid program, as provided by 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 (1995), is . . . deductible, co-insurance or co-payment required by the plan to be paid by the individual....” 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . .

INDIANA PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, Co. v. INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION M., 881 F. Supp. 395 (S.D. Ind. 1994)

. . . . § 447.15. . . .

PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL SOCIETY Dr. B. M. D. v. F. SNIDER, E. B. M. D., 29 F.3d 886 (3d Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 447.15 (1993). . . .

KANSAS HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, v. L. WHITEMAN, C., 835 F. Supp. 1556 (D. Kan. 1993)

. . . . § 447.15. . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 (prohibition against denying services to eligible individuals on account of inability . . .

KANSAS HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, v. L. WHITEMAN,, 835 F. Supp. 1548 (D. Kan. 1993)

. . . . § 447.15. . . .

BANKS, a a J. v. SECRETARY OF INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, s, 997 F.2d 231 (7th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 447.15 provides that “[a] state plan must provide that the Medicaid agency must limit participation . . . We find that the Secretary’s interpretation of 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 is reasonable, and comports with the . . . (See 42 C.F.R. 447.15). Ind. Admin. Code tit. 470 r. 5-1-3(i) (1991 Cum.Supp.). . . . Department of Public Welfare, 566 N.E.2d 544 (Ind.App.1991), demonstrates that 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 and . . . It is true that the Easley court did not address 42 C.F.R. § 447.15, but considered the plaintiffs due . . .

FULKERSON, v. COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,, 802 F. Supp. 529 (D. Me. 1992)

. . . . § 447.15. . . .

BANKS, v. SECRETARY OF THE INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,, 790 F. Supp. 1427 (N.D. Ind. 1992)

. . . . § 447.15, providers must accept the Medicaid reimbursement they receive as payment in full in order . . . The plaintiffs argue that the defendants’ reliance on 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 is misplaced, because that provision . . . more to prevent the filing of nonmeritorious lawsuits than the Secretary’s regulation at 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . .

NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION A. v. A. PERALES, W. M. D., 954 F.2d 854 (2d Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 447.15 (1989). New York State is a participant in the Medicaid program. . . . Specifically, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1320a-7b(d), formerly § 1396h(d), as elaborated by 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 (1989 . . . . § 447.15. . . .

In R. CIFALIA, KEY BANK OF FLORIDA, v. R. CIFALIA,, 124 B.R. 124 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . The judgment awarded to the Bank the sum of $180,-447.15 against Mercedes Specialists, Inc. and the Debtor . . .

FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE NURSING HOME, v. PERALES,, 782 F.2d 26 (2d Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 447.15, and Seneca Nursing Home v. . . . patients with resources of their own can afford; The regulatory scheme is not altered by 42 C.F.R. § 447.15 . . . According to section 447.15, “[a] State plan must provide that the Medicaid agency must limit participation . . . Section 447.15 does not discuss the agency’s purported responsibility to the provider for costs of care . . .

In STABLE MEWS ASSOCIATES,, 49 B.R. 395 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . ’ time charges, $1,354.80 for reimbursement of out-of-pocket disbursements, and a 15% bonus of $21,-447.15 . . .

COHEN, COHEN, v. F. QUERN,, 608 F. Supp. 1324 (N.D. Ill. 1984)

. . . . § 447.15. . . .

E. SAMUEL v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, A. KATZ v. A. MYERS, DOES I- X,, 570 F. Supp. 566 (N.D. Cal. 1983)

. . . The applicable provisions are 42 U.S.C. section 1396h(d)(1), 42 C.F.R. section 447.15, California Welfare . . . plan to incorporate a provision for enforcement of 42 U.S.C. section 1396h(d)(l) is 42 C.F.R. section 447.15 . . .

FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE NURSING HOME, v. B. BLUM,, 570 F. Supp. 285 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . . § 447.15 states that: A state plan must provide that the Medicaid agency must limit participation in . . .

MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, INC. a a a TLC a a a a v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBIC WELFARE, J. Jr., 602 F.2d 150 (8th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 447.15 (1978). . . .

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH v. ANDERSON- PRICHARD OIL CORPORATION, 141 F.2d 443 (10th Cir. 1944)

. . . for the Pipe $153,660.55 $146,732.74 Bine Company: Operating expense 741.64 713.43 General overhead 447.15 . . .