The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . awarding a partial final judgment in favor of the City of Apopka [“Apopka”] on their claims that section 447.509 . . . pending an investigation to determine whether they had “solicited” Jeffrey Tyre in violation of section 447.509 . . . Section 447.509 provides: (1) Employee organizations, their members, agents, or representatives, or any . . . suit against Apopka, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, principally contending that section 447.509 . . . with the trial court’s disposition of each claim and with the trial court’s conclusion that section 447.509 . . .
. . . hear and determine all actions alleging violations of the no-strike provision of the Act and section 447.509 . . .
. . . Furthermore, section 447.509(1)(c) prohibits employee organizations or their representatives from “instigating . . .
. . . AFT-H appeals PERC’s ruling as to the lounges, arguing first that it erred in interpreting section 447.509 . . .
. . . The right of solicitation and distribution, although limited by section 447.509, is nonetheless a right . . . Section 447.509(3) gives the circuit court jurisdiction to enforce the restrictions in section 447.509 . . . Permissible restrictions on the employee’s right are codified in section 447.509. . . . Section 447.509(l)(a). . . . We hold that section 447.509 is intended to prohibit distribution in working areas at all times, and . . . In the second point, appellant argued that PERC erred by holding that appellant violated section 447.509 . . .
. . . .-401, and 447.509), the City argues that under the district court’s application of article I, section . . .
. . . as alleged in the County’s objections based on unfair labor practices (Sections 447.301(1), (2) and 447.509 . . .
. . . PERC’s definition of those rights is found in two sources: the reverse implications of Section 447.509 . . . Section 447.509(1) provides: (1) Employee organizations, their members, agents, or representatives, or . . . employee solicitation of other employees for organizational purposes is consonant both with Section 447.509 . . . The order before us recognizes the distinction, found both in Section 447.509(1) and in NLRA decisions . . . Section 447.509(l)(a). . . .
. . . . §§ 447.607 and 447.509 (1974). . E. g., San Diego Building Trades Council v. . . .