The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 456
HEALTH PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 456.43

456.43 Electronic prescribing for medicinal drugs.—

(1) Electronic prescribing may not interfere with a patient’s freedom to choose a pharmacy.

(2) Electronic prescribing software may not use any means or permit any other person to use any means to influence or attempt to influence, through economic incentives or otherwise, the prescribing decision of a prescribing practitioner or his or her agent at the point of care, including, but not limited to, means such as advertising, instant messaging, pop-up ads, and similar means triggered by or in specific response to the input, selection, or act of a prescribing practitioner or his or her agent in prescribing a certain medicinal drug or directing a patient to a certain pharmacy. For purposes of this subsection, the term:

(a) “Prescribing decision” means a prescribing practitioner’s or his or her agent’s decision to prescribe any medicinal drug.

(b) “Point of care” means the time at which a prescribing practitioner or his or her agent prescribes any medicinal drug.

(3) Electronic prescribing software may display information regarding a payor’s formulary if nothing is designed to preclude or make more difficult the selection of any particular pharmacy by a patient or the selection of a certain medicinal drug by a prescribing practitioner or his or her agent.

History.—s. 3, ch. 2006-271; s. 2, ch. 2019-112.

F.S. 456.43 on Google Scholar

F.S. 456.43 on Casetext

Amendments to 456.43

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 456.43

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 456.43.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GJR INVESTMENTS, INC. v. COUNTY OF ESCAMBIA, FLORIDA, a W. A. a. k. a C. GJR INVESTMENTS, INC. v. COUNTY OF ESCAMBIA, FLORIDA, a W. A. a. k. a. C., 132 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . Point of Beginning; thence run North 65°5'48" East along said Southerly right-of-way line a distance of 456.43 . . .

In HOBBS C. FESSENDEN, v. IRELAND, Jr. d b a, 213 B.R. 207 (Bankr. D. Me. 1997)

. . . He seeks $4,162.50 in fees and $456.43 in costs. I find the request reasonable and will award it. . . . violation of § 110(f)(1); (g) Awarding Fessenden fees in the amount of $4162.50 and costs in the amount of $456.43 . . .

G. A. v. G. Jr. v., 77 T.C. 1353 (T.C. 1981)

. . . Bolinger $209.74 $456.43 $469.17 Maurice G., Jr., and Rita Bolinger 231.82 555.51 704.40 The sole issue . . .

R. Sr. v., 56 T.C. 388 (T.C. 1971)

. . . Utilities. 456.43 802.80 1,222.63 1,079.68 1,281.18 1,161.89 Depreciation. 554.36 781.97 3,724.38 3,399.88 . . .