Cases from cite.case.law:

CBS OUTDOOR INC. SLG LLC, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 124 So. 3d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See, e.g., § 479.02, Fla. Stat. . . .

LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING- LAKELAND, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 17 So. 3d 799 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The ALJ disagreed and found sections 479.02(1) and 339.05, Florida Statutes (2007), provide support for . . . First, we find the ALJ erred in determining that section 479.02 authorizes Rule 14-10.007(2)(b). . . . Section 479.02(1), therefore, cannot provide the necessary authority for Rule 14-10.007(2)(b). . . . In contrast to section 479.02(1), subsection (2) contains the word “height.” . . . Specific Authority 334.044(2), 479.02(7) FS. Law Implemented 339.05, 479.02, 479.07(9) FS. . . . .

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 15 So. 3d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . sign which violated the spacing requirement which was part of the federal regulations when section 479.02 . . .

CAFE EROTICA We v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 830 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 479.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

CHANCELLOR MEDIA WHITECO OUTDOOR CORPORATION, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 796 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Pursuant to section 479.02(1), Florida Statutes, administration and enforcement of the agreement have . . .

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT v. CHARLOTTE COUNTY,, 774 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . 311.105(l)(e), 364.052(5), 388.4111(2)(c), 403.702(2)(a), 403.704(17), 403.707(6)(c), 420.5087(4), 479.02 . . .

HANCOCK ADVERTISING, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 549 So. 2d 1086 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 479.02(2), Fla.Stat. (1987); see Fla.Admin. . . . of the legislature in enacting this chapter is to regulate signs adjacent to regulated highways. § 479.02 . . .

MCDONALD S CORPORATION, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 535 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . that appellant’s business establishment sign was erected in violation of section 479.105 and section 479.02 . . . Section 479.105 provides for the removal of signs which require permits and do not have same; and Section 479.02 . . .

TRI- STATE SYSTEMS, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 500 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 479.02(3) requires DOT to “determine unzoned commercial areas and unzoned industrial areas” when . . .

E. HAMMOND, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 493 So. 2d 33 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . But section 479.02(2), Florida Statutes, expressly directs DOT to regulate advertising signs along the . . .

UNITED STATES v. De BUSHROD,, 763 F.2d 1051 (9th Cir. 1985)

. . . agent recorded the conversation between Pink and Pierce in which they agreed to settle the debt of $479.02 . . .

BEST WESTERN TIVOLI INN v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 448 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . industrial zoned or commercial and industrial unzoned areas subject to agreement established by s. 479.02 . . .

BEST WESTERN TIVOLI INN v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 435 So. 2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Florida Department of Transportation, 398 So.2d 1370 (Fla.1981) and sec. 479.02, Fla. . . .

LaPOINTE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 398 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 1981)

. . . .-24, Florida Statutes (1977), for requiring the sign’s removal for violation of section 479.02(1), Florida . . . DOT thereafter cited LaPointe for violation of section 479.02, erecting a sign within 1000 feet of a . . . Section 479.02(1) provides: 479.02 Enforcement of provisions by department. — It shall be the function . . .

CITY OF LAKE WALES, v. LAMAR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF LAKELAND, a d b a, 399 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 479.02, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

LA POINTE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 382 So. 2d 1347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Department of Transportation ordering removal of its outdoor advertising sign found to violate Sections 479.02 . . . a letter advising it that its sign, located within 1000 feet of a permitted sign, violated Section 479.02 . . . Section 479.02, Florida Statutes (1971), authorized the Governor to execute an agreement with the Secretary . . . contest the Department’s findings regarding the permit violation. (§ 497.07(1), Fla.Stat. (1977).) . 479.02 . . .

A. W. LEE, Jr. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 366 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Law Implemented 479.02, 479.05, 479.11, 479.10 and 479.16 F.S., Agreement between Governor and U. . . .

P. BRAZIL, B B v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 347 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 479.02, Florida Statutes (1971), authorized the governor to execute an agreement with the appropriate . . . We find, however, DOT had ample enforcement powers under Section 479.02 aside from the agreement. . . . However, Section 479.02 was amended, effective April 21, 1972, by Chapter 72-274, Laws of Florida, as . . . It is only affected by the spacing regulation set down by § 479.02 and 23 C.F.R. section 20.7(b)(2). . . . confusion: “479.02 Enforcement of provisions by department. . . .