Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 499.61 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 499.61 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 499.61

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 499
FLORIDA DRUG AND COSMETIC ACT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 499.61
499.61 Definitions.As used in this part:
(1) “Dealer” means any person, firm, corporation, or other entity selling, brokering, or transferring ether to anyone other than a licensed ether manufacturer, distributor, or dealer.
(2) “Department” means the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.
(3) “Distributor” means any person, firm, corporation, or other entity distributing, selling, marketing, transferring, or otherwise supplying ether to retailers, dealers, or any other entity in the primary channel of trade, but does not include retailers.
(4) “Ether” means diethyl ether in any form.
(5) “Manufacturer” means any person, firm, corporation, or other entity preparing, deriving, producing, synthesizing, or otherwise making ether in any form or repacking, relabeling, or manipulating ether.
(6) “Purchaser” means any person, firm, corporation, or other entity who purchases ether in quantities of 2.5 gallons, or equivalent by weight, or more for any purpose whatsoever, but does not include a dealer, distributor, or manufacturer.
History.ss. 10, 11, ch. 86-133; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 242, ch. 99-8; s. 8, ch. 2012-143; s. 124, ch. 2012-184.

F.S. 499.61 on Google Scholar

F.S. 499.61 on Casetext

Amendments to 499.61


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 499.61
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 499.61.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

K. LORENTZEN v. ANDERSON PEST CONTROL, E. CARLSON, 64 F.3d 327 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . 1993, the district court adopted the second Report and Recommendation, ordering Carlson to pay $74,-499.61 . . .