The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Days Inn alternatively asserts that its liability should have been limited pursuant to chapter 509.111 . . .
. . . . § 20-26-302; Fla.Stat. ch. 509.111; Mich.Comp.Laws § 427.102; Minn.Stat. § 327.71; Ohio Rev. . . .
. . . The Maglieris sued Marriott and, pursuant to sections 509.101 and 509.111, Florida Statutes (1993), the . . .
. . . and the lower court entered, summary judgment limiting respondent’s liability in accord with section 509.111 . . . Section 509.111, Florida Statutes (1993), provides: (1) The operator of a public lodging establishment . . .
. . . We reverse because the hotel’s liability was limited under Section 509.111(2), Florida Statutes (1993 . . . Pursuant to Section 509.111(2), a negligent hotel operator is limited to $500 in liability for losses . . . hotel misled them into believing the room was safe, and therefore waived its right to rely upon Section 509.111 . . .
. . . proximate cause of Fair’s loss, and write only to address Howard Johnson’s contention that section 509.111 . . . Thus, it is generally held that statutes, such as section 509.111, defining the limits of an innkeeper . . . .2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), the court had occasion to construe a predecessor to the present section 509.111 . . . to the effect that damages, if found, should be limited to $100.00 (now $500.00) pursuant to section 509.111 . . . Section 509.111(2) provides: (1) The operator of a public lodging establishment is under no obligation . . .
. . . The central question presented for review is whether an innkeeper may rely on Section 509.111, Florida . . . Specifically, the trial court ruled that the defendants had posted Section 509.111, Florida Statutes . . . a guest’s property, however, an innkeeper’s negligence liability is specifically limited by Section 509.111 . . . Section 509.111, Florida Statutes (1985), the innkeeper’s limitation of liability statute, provides: . . . to any guest for the loss of effects listed in such inventory in a total amount exceeding $1,000.” § 509.111 . . .
. . . After the trial, the lower court reduced the verdict and judgment to $500 pursuant to section 509.111 . . . Even to the extent that it applies, section 509.111(1) limits an innkeeper’s liability only as to the . . . Howard Johnson’s does not challenge the jury finding to this effect. . 509.111 Liability for property . . .
. . . that no material issues of fact existed regarding the Hotel’s compliance with sections 509.101 and 509.111 . . . (1979), and, as a consequence, waived the $1,000 limitation of liability established under section 509.111 . . . Harbor Island Spa, Inc., 420 F.2d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.1970), and section 509.111, enacted in derogation . . . Section 509.111(1), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a hotel follow certain procedures .in order . . . Margery Lane, Inc., 242 So.2d at 779; § 509.111(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .
. . . Dollar statutory limitation of liability set forth in Section 509.111 Florida Statute. . . . Section 509.111(1) which limits liability for loss or theft of valuables placed by a hotel guest in a . . . The provisions of this card were in compliance with Section 509.111(1) Florida Statutes and were printed . . .
. . . . § 509.111(1) (1979). On November 17, 1979, the plaintiff, Mrs. . . . for summary judgment, holding that on the undisputed facts the Hotel satisfied the requirements of § 509.111 . . . and declining to review the District Court’s ruling as to the defendant’s liability under Fla.Stat. § 509.111 . . . Section 509.111(1) provides that a hotel’s liability may be limited only if the hotel “gave a receipt . . . contents and this statement is made as an inducement to said hotel to receive contents pursuant to Section 509.111 . . .
. . . The applicability of the Florida Innkeeper’s Statute, Section 509.111, Florida Statutes (1979), is called . . . That statute, Section 509.111 Florida Statutes (1979), provides: (1) The operator of a public lodging . . . Subsection (2) of 509.111 places the burden of complying with enumerated procedures on the guest in order . . . a guest’s property only when the loss is a proximate result of fault or negligence of the hotel. § 509.111 . . . There were no issues of fact as to the applicability of Section 509.111 in the instant case. . . .
. . . limiting plaintiff’s recovery to $1,000, the maximum liability imposed on innkeepers by statute, § 509.111 . . . This statute also required that a copy of such rules be posted together with a copy of § 509.111, supra . . . Plaintiff disputes that the requirements of § 509.111 were satisfied, and asserts that the facts, which . . . Defendant’s remaining contention is that because defendant has not established that a copy of § 509.111 . . . Florida Statute, § 509.111(1) (1972): “The proprietor or manager of a hotel, apartment house, rooming . . .
. . . Whether Florida statute § 509.111 applies to the facts of this case. 3. . . . with the hotel management [Chapter 16042 Florida Acts, § 40 (1933), the forerunner of the present § 509.111 . . . The appellants say that a failure to post the notices would render Section 509.111 violative of both . . . Florida Statute, § 509.111 (1972): 509.111 Liability for property of guests and tenants (1) The proprietor . . . pursuant to this section shall be printed in the English language and posted together with a copy of §§ 509.111 . . .
. . . consolidated cases plaintiffs appeal from a final summary judgment limiting defendant’s liability under F.S. 509.111 . . . Notices containing a paraphrase of F.S. 509.111, F.S.A., supplied by the Florida Hotel and Restaurant . . . Defendant hotel, relying on plaintiffs’ failure to tender an estimate of value as required by F.S. 509.111 . . . Whether the guests had or did not have actual notice of F.S. 509.111, F.S.A., is immaterial to either . . . F.S. 509.111, F.S.A., Liability for property of guests and tenants. (1) The proprietor or manager of . . .
. . . neither the hotel nor the guest made an effort to comply strictly with the provisions of Florida Statute 509.111 . . . give actual notice to any plaintiff of the requirements of the Florida Statute as contained in Section 509.111 . . . The posted notice of the provisions of Florida Statute § 509.111, F.S.A. was a form furnished by the . . . The notice set out section 509.111 in abridged form. . . . Defendant may not avoid liability under § 509.111, Florida Statutes, since it instituted a procedure . . .
. . . The appellant argues that Florida Statutes, § 509.111, F.S.A., which deals with the liability of innkeepers . . .
. . . The pertinent regulation, section 509.111, states that income derived by a nonresident alien residing . . . Sec. 509.111 Real Property Income and Natural Resource Royalties — (a) General. — Income of whatever . . .
. . . request of the appellant, to the effect that damages, if found, should be limited to $100, pursuant to § 509.111 . . . The sole issue presented is the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury pursuant to § 509.111(2) supra . . .
. . . . § 509.111, the complaint failed to state a claim against it. . . .
. . . The question raised on this appeal is whether the limitation of liability established by section 509.111 . . . While the court is of the opinion that the Kaufmans were “guests” within the meaning of section 509.111 . . . It is the view of the court that sections 509.101 and 509.111 must be construed in pari materia. . . . To avail itself of the limitation of liability created under section 509.111, the hotel must have first . . . with section 509.101 which requires the posting of rules and regulations including a copy of section 509.111 . . .
. . . . § 509.111) and thus rendering itself liable under the common-law bailment and negligence theories. . . . The decision here must turn upon the construction of the following Florida Statutes: “509.111 Liability . . . that there was a complete failure on the part of the guests to comply with the requirements of Section 509.111 . . .
