Cases from cite.case.law:

SULLIVAN, v. PJ UNITED, INC., 362 F. Supp. 3d 1139 (N.D. Ala. 2018)

. . . Section 516.27 differs materially from the recordkeeping obligations incumbent upon Defendants in §§ . . . Section § 516.27(b) further requires than an employer maintain records showing on a workweek basis the . . . Caro-Galvan is ultimately unhelpful because it dealt with the recordkeeping requirements under § 516.27 . . . Sullivan does not allege, nor could he reasonably, that Defendants have failed to comply with § 516.27 . . . Indeed, § 516.27's referral to "board, lodging, or other facilities" shows that in the event the DOL . . .

ROCES v. RENO HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 300 F. Supp. 3d 1172 (D. Nev. 2018)

. . . . § 516.27(a). . . . RHA has maintained adequate records substantiating the cost of furnishing the lodging ( 29 C.F.R. § 516.27 . . . Several courts have analyzed the recordkeeping requirements under 29 C.F.R. § 516.27, and have ultimately . . . denied for the sole reason of an employer's failure to maintain the records required by 29 C.F.R. § 516.27 . . . Thus, RHA has apparently complied with 29 C.F.R. § 516.27(a), if not subparagraph (b). . . .

BALBED, v. EDEN PARK GUEST HOUSE, LLC, 881 F.3d 285 (4th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 516.27(a). U.S. . . . See 29 C.F.R. § 516.27(a) (“[A]n employer who makes deductions from..wages of employees for ‘board, lodging . . . See 29 C.F.R. §§ 516.27(a)(1), (b). . . . See 29 C.F.R. § 516.27(a)(2) (“No particular degree of itemization is prescribed. . . . not maintain records showing deductions from wages on a workweek basis, as required under 29 C.F.R. § 516.27 . . .

MALDONADO, v. ALTA HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. L., 17 F. Supp. 3d 1181 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 516.27(a)). . . . the reasonable cost of each benefit, let alone the detailed justification required under 29 C.F.R. §§ 516.27 . . .

L. SOLIS, v. HILL COUNTRY FARMS, INC. d b a s, 808 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (S.D. Iowa 2011)

. . . Part 516, “Records To Be Kept By Employers,” including § 516.27, “Board, lodging, or other facilities . . . Employers are required by regulations to keep records of the cost of such facilities, 29 C.F.R. § 516.27 . . .

RAMOS- BARRIENTOS, v. C. BLAND,, 728 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (S.D. Ga. 2010)

. . . . § 516.27 (“Separate records of the cost of each item furnished to an employee need not be kept.... . . .

L. SOLIS, v. MIN FANG YANG, 345 F. App'x 35 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 516.27(a). . . .

YU G. KE, L. J. Q. Y. H. D. Z. Y. Y. Q. De S. G. Y. Y. X. Li, H. Li, Qi H. Li Q. W. Yi L. G. De K. Mu L. G. G. H. Yu M. Yu, R. Yu X. v. SAIGON GRILL, INC. a k a S. Lu a k a K. a k a, 595 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . . § 516.27(a), and bears the burden of proving both the actual costs and their reasonableness. . . .

MORGAN v. SPEAKEASY, LLC, d b a, 625 F. Supp. 2d 632 (N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . . § 516.27(a)) (emphasis in original). . . .

MARROQUIN, v. CANALES,, 505 F. Supp. 2d 283 (D. Md. 2007)

. . . . § 516.27(a); see also Donovan v. Williams Chem. . . .

ROSALES v. LORE,, 149 F. App'x 245 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 516.27(a)(1). . . .

C. BROCK, v. CARRION, LTD., 332 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (E.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . . § 516.27(a) & (b) (2004). . . . Section 516.27 provides that: “[A]n employer who makes deductions from the wages of employees for ‘board . . . Id. § 516.27(b). . . . Defendants argue that, under 29 C.F.R. § 516.27(c), they are not subject to the FLSA’s record-keeping . . . Section 516.27(c) exempts employers from the record-keeping requirements only if two conditions are met . . .

ESTANISLAU, Jr. v. MANCHESTER DEVELOPERS, LLC, 316 F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Conn. 2004)

. . . maintain and preserve records substantiating the cost of furnishing each class of facility...” 29 C.F.R. 516.27 . . . than the applicable statutory minimum wage in cash for all hours worked in that workweek.” 29 C.F.R. 516.27 . . . Collis Foods, Inc., 176 F.3d 912, 919 (6th Cir.1999) (Applying 29 C.F.R. § 516.27(b)(1) and 29 C.F.R. . . . § 516.27(a)(2) to hold that non-itemized records of the average cost of meals provided is sufficient . . . than the applicable statutory minimum wage in cash for all hours worked in that workweek.” 29 C.F.R. 516.27 . . .

ARCHIE, v. GRAND CENTRAL PARTNERSHIP, INC., 86 F. Supp. 2d 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . . § 516.27(b) for employers who provide benefits as wages, does not mandate denial of deductions now. . . .

M. HERMAN, v. COLLIS FOODS, INC., 176 F.3d 912 (6th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 516.27(a)(2). . . . See 29 C.F.R. 516.27(a). S. . . . See 29 C.F.R. § 516.27(b)(1). However, “[n]o particular degree of itemization is prescribed.” . . . . § 516.27(a)(2). . . . See 29 C.F.R. § 516.27(a). . . .

HERMAN, v. PALO GROUP FOSTER HOME, INC. a, 183 F.3d 468 (6th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 516.27(a). . . .

HERMAN, v. PALO GROUP FOSTER HOME, INC. a, 976 F. Supp. 696 (W.D. Mich. 1997)

. . . . § 516.27(a). Defendants’ records are deficient in two respects. . . .

MORRISROE, v. GOLDSBORO MILLING COMPANY,, 884 F. Supp. 192 (E.D.N.C. 1994)

. . . . § 516.27, in order to demonstrate the reasonable cost of the expenditures, and if these expenditures . . . cost is substantiated by properly maintained payroll and accounting records required by 29 C.F.R. § 516.27 . . .

CARO- GALVAN De De v. CURTIS RICHARDSON, INC., 993 F.2d 1500 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 516.27. In Donovan v. . . .

B. REICH, v. CHEZ ROBERT, INC., 821 F. Supp. 967 (D.N.J. 1993)

. . . . § 516.27(a) (1991). . . .

CARO- GALVAN De De v. CURTIS RICHARDSON, INC., 981 F.2d 501 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 516.27. In Donovan v. . . .

E. LEACH, Jr. Jr. Jr. v. B. JOHNSTON, Sr., 812 F. Supp. 1198 (M.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . . § 516.27(a). . . . Findings of Fact 111126, 32; 29 C.F.R. § 516.27(a). . . .

DOLE v. BISHOP, 740 F. Supp. 1221 (S.D. Miss. 1990)

. . . contemporaneous records of meal credits, as required by the Wage and Hour Division regulations. 29 C.F.R. 516.27 . . .

LEONARD, v. CARMICHAEL PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT CO. INC., 614 F. Supp. 1182 (S.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . . § 516.27(a), and also require the employer to maintain, on a work-week basis, records reflecting additions . . . Where, as here, the employer has failed to comply with the record-keeping provisions, 29 C.F.R. § 516.27 . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. I AND J, INC., 567 F. Supp. 93 (D.N.M. 1983)

. . . . § 516.27 (1982). . . . See 29 C.F.R. § 531.32 (1982). . 29 C.F.R. § 516.27 provides in pertinent part that “(a) [i]n addition . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. TONY AND SUSAN ALAMO FOUNDATION,, 567 F. Supp. 556 (W.D. Ark. 1982)

. . . . § 516.27(a), and also require the employer to maintain records showing additions or deductions from . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. WILLIAMS CHEMICAL CO. INC. a G., 682 F.2d 185 (8th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 516.27(a), and also require the employer to maintain records showing additions or deductions from . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. NEW FLORIDIAN HOTEL, INC. a d b a a k a, 676 F.2d 468 (11th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 516.27(a), and also require the employer to maintain, on work week basis, records reflecting additions . . . The appellants have not kept the records required by 29 C.F.R. § 516.27 with respect to the cost of providing . . .

LOPEZ v. RODRIGUEZ, 668 F.2d 1376 (D.C. Cir. 1981)

. . . . §§ 516.27, 516.34, 552.100(c)-(d) (1980). . . . .