Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 518.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 518.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 518.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 518
INVESTMENT OF FIDUCIARY FUNDS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 518.10
518.10 Fiduciary defined as used in ss. 518.11-518.14.For the purpose of ss. 518.11-518.14, a “fiduciary” is defined as an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian (except any guardian holding funds received from or currently in receipt of funds from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, to the extent of those funds alone), or other person, whether individual or corporate, who by reason of a written agreement, will, court order, or other instrument has the responsibility for the acquisition, investment, reinvestment, exchange, retention, sale, or management of money or property of another.
History.s. 5, ch. 28154, 1953; s. 28, ch. 93-268.

F.S. 518.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 518.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 518.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 518.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 518.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES, v. G. LONGMIRE, XXX- XX- XXXX, 39 M.J. 536 (A.C.M.R. 1994)

. . . He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for two months, forfeiture of $518.10 pay per . . .

In ESTATE FELDSTEIN,, 292 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . §§ 518.10 and 518.11, F.S.A., the “prudent man rule.” . . .

E. L. v., 47 T.C. 113 (T.C. 1966)

. . . a maximum deduction of $10,000, reporting total expenses of $10,575.23, insurance reimbursement of $518.10 . . .

RYAN v. ALEXANDER,, 118 F.2d 744 (10th Cir. 1941)

. . . overassessment and the claim for refund was allowed to the extent of $6,065.27, with interest in the sum of $1,-518.10 . . .

SMITH v. ST. LOUIS AND SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, 181 U.S. 248 (U.S. 1901)

. . . The judgment amounted to $518.10. . . .