Cases from cite.case.law:

In OVERLAND PARK FINANCIAL CORPORATION, v., 232 B.R. 215 (D. Kan. 1999)

. . . . § 536.13(b). . . .

A. BALLEW, v. ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY OF NEBRASKA, INC. a, 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976)

. . . See footnote 3, supra. . “536.13(7)(c) provides, in part: ‘If the contract is prepaid in full the borrower . . . installment periods scheduled to follow the installment date nearest the date of prepayment in full . . . “536.13 . . .

KENNEY, v. LANDIS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 376 F. Supp. 852 (N.D. Iowa 1974)

. . . note is void because it provides for various charges not permitted under Chapt. 536 in violation of § 536.13 . . . March 30, 1972 that defendant’s use of the Rule of 78ths to compute rebates upon prepayment violates § 536.13 . . . (6) and § 536.13(7) (c) since the latter section requires use of the actuarial method to compute rebates . . . in computing rebates for prepayment of loans as required by § 536.-13(7) (c) is the Rule of 78ths. § 536.13 . . . bears to the sum of all monthly balances originally scheduled to be outstanding by the contract. it § 536.13 . . .

KENNEY, v. LANDIS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 349 F. Supp. 939 (N.D. Iowa 1972)

. . . Thus it appears that the rebate computation employed by defendant is in violation of section 536.13 of . . . Section 536.13(7) (0) of tin; Iowa Code states as follows: “0. . . . Section 536.13(8) of the Iowa Code states as follows: “8. . . . Iowa Code § 536.13(7) (0) provides in part: “For the purpose of computing the rebate. any prepayment . . . Also, the court cannot agree with defendant that the following statutory language § 536.13(7) : “The . . .