Cases from cite.case.law:

C. v., 228 Ct. Cl. 750 (Ct. Cl. 1981)

. . . . § 536.15(q) (1971). . . .

v., 83 Cust. Ct. 33 (Cust. Ct. 1979)

. . . The merchandise was classified under item 536.15, TSUS, providing: Schedule 5, part 2, subpart E: Ceramic . . . wares, and articles of such wares, not specially provided for: 536.15 Other_ 20% ad val. . . . however, the Government concedes that the subject merchandise was improperly classified under item 536.15 . . . In addition to conceding that the classification of the imported merchandise in issue under item 536.15 . . . In view of the defendant’s concession that the official classification under item 536.15, TSUS, was erroneous . . .

v., 69 Cust. Ct. 121 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . 40 per centum ad valorem are claimed properly dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem under TSUS item 536.15 . . . articles of such wares, not specially provided for: 536.11 Of porcelain or of subporcelain- 45% ad val. 536.15 . . .

ERICKSON S INC. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., 330 F. Supp. 380 (S.D. Ga. 1971)

. . . introduced any counterclaims that would offset the $79,592.35 figure, and all of these claims (totaling $536.15 . . . That amount represents the balance admittedly owed of $79,592.39 less all possible offsets alleged ($536.15 . . .

J. v., 65 Cust. Ct. 334 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . provided for, dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem under TSUS (Tariff Schedules of the United States) item 536.15 . . . Customs liquidated the entries (there are four in this protest) “as entered”, under TSUS item 536.15. . . . Plaintiff now protests that the customs liquidation under TSUS item 536.15 was improper. 10 U.S.C., section . . . Preliminarily, we note that TSUS item 536.15, against which this protest is directed, is one of the “ . . . provided for in TSUS item 532.11, it follows that they were improperly assessed with duty under TSUS item 536.15 . . .

V. v., 65 Cust. Ct. 301 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . for, dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem under TSU'S (Tariff Schedules of the United States) item 536.15 . . . open court, defendant stated that if customs wrongly classified the ceramic articles under TSUS item 536.15 . . . There is no need to dwell on the customs classifying item TSUS 536.15. . . . The merchandise was classified under schedule 5, part 2, subpart E, TSUS item 536.15, which is as follows . . . Specially Provided For Ceramic wares, and articles of such wares, not specially provided for: ‡ H* ‡ ‡ # 536.15 . . .

BARTON AGENCY, LTD. v. UNITED STATES, 279 F. Supp. 432 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . An additional claim under item 536.15 was specifically abandoned. . . .

v., 60 Cust. Ct. 75 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . An additional claim under item 536.15 was specifically abandoned. . . .

v., 18 T.C. 261 (T.C. 1952)

. . . Jan. 31, 1934. 419, 312. 50 Jan. 31, 1935. 424,707.01 Jan. 31, 1936. 389, 696.29 Jan. 31, 1937. 420, 536.15 . . .