The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 551
SLOT MACHINES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 551.104

551.104 License to conduct slot machine gaming.—

(1) Upon application and a finding by the commission after investigation that the application is complete and the applicant is qualified and payment of the initial license fee, the commission may issue a license to conduct slot machine gaming in the designated slot machine gaming area of the eligible facility. Once licensed, slot machine gaming may be conducted subject to the requirements of this chapter and rules adopted pursuant thereto.

(2) An application may be approved by the commission only after the voters of the county where the applicant’s facility is located have authorized by referendum slot machines within pari-mutuel facilities in that county as specified in s. 23, Art. X of the State Constitution.

(3) A slot machine license may be issued only to a licensed pari-mutuel permitholder, and slot machine gaming may be conducted only at the eligible facility at which the permitholder is authorized under its valid pari-mutuel wagering permit to conduct pari-mutuel wagering activities.

(4) As a condition of licensure and to maintain continued authority for the conduct of slot machine gaming, the slot machine licensee shall:

(a) Continue to be in compliance with this chapter.

(b) Continue to be in compliance with chapter 550, where applicable, and maintain the pari-mutuel permit and license in good standing pursuant to the provisions of chapter 550. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of law and in order to expedite the operation of slot machines at eligible facilities, any eligible facility shall be entitled within 60 days after the effective date of this act to amend its 2006-2007 pari-mutuel wagering operating license issued by the commission under ss. 550.0115 and 550.01215. The commission shall issue a new license to the eligible facility to effectuate any approved change.

(c) If a thoroughbred permitholder, conduct no fewer than a full schedule of live racing or games as defined in s. 550.002(10). A permitholder’s responsibility to conduct live races or games shall be reduced by the number of races or games that could not be conducted due to the direct result of fire, strike, war, hurricane, pandemic, or other disaster or event beyond the control of the permitholder.

(d) Upon approval of any changes relating to the pari-mutuel permit by the commission, be responsible for providing appropriate current and accurate documentation on a timely basis to the commission in order to continue the slot machine license in good standing. Changes in ownership or interest of a slot machine license of 5 percent or more of the stock or other evidence of ownership or equity in the slot machine license or any parent corporation or other business entity that in any way owns or controls the slot machine license shall be approved by the commission prior to such change, unless the owner is an existing holder of that license who was previously approved by the commission. Changes in ownership or interest of a slot machine license of less than 5 percent, unless such change results in a cumulative total of 5 percent or more, shall be reported to the commission within 20 days after the change. The commission may then conduct an investigation to ensure that the license is properly updated to show the change in ownership or interest. No reporting is required if the person is holding 5 percent or less equity or securities of a corporate owner of the slot machine licensee that has its securities registered pursuant to s. 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss. 78a-78kk, and if such corporation or entity files with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission the reports required by s. 13 of that act or if the securities of the corporation or entity are regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States. A change in ownership or interest of less than 5 percent which results in a cumulative ownership or interest of 5 percent or more shall be approved by the commission prior to such change unless the owner is an existing holder of the license who was previously approved by the commission.

(e) Allow the commission and the Department of Law Enforcement unrestricted access to and right of inspection of facilities of a slot machine licensee in which any activity relative to the conduct of slot machine gaming is conducted.

(f) Ensure that the facilities-based computer system that the licensee will use for operational and accounting functions of the slot machine facility is specifically structured to facilitate regulatory oversight. The facilities-based computer system shall be designed to provide the commission and the Department of Law Enforcement with the ability to monitor, at any time on a real-time basis, the wagering patterns, payouts, tax collection, and such other operations as necessary to determine whether the facility is in compliance with statutory provisions and rules adopted by the commission for the regulation and control of slot machine gaming. The commission and the Department of Law Enforcement shall have complete and continuous access to this system. Such access shall include the ability of either the commission or the Department of Law Enforcement to suspend play immediately on particular slot machines if monitoring of the system indicates possible tampering or manipulation of those slot machines or the ability to suspend play immediately of the entire operation if the tampering or manipulation is of the computer system itself. The computer system shall be reviewed and approved by the commission to ensure necessary access, security, and functionality. The commission may adopt rules to provide for the approval process.

(g) Ensure that each slot machine is protected from manipulation or tampering to affect the random probabilities of winning plays. The commission or the Department of Law Enforcement shall have the authority to suspend play upon reasonable suspicion of any manipulation or tampering. When play has been suspended on any slot machine, the commission or the Department of Law Enforcement may examine any slot machine to determine whether the machine has been tampered with or manipulated and whether the machine should be returned to operation.

(h) Submit a security plan, including the facilities’ floor plan, the locations of security cameras, and a listing of all security equipment that is capable of observing and electronically recording activities being conducted in the facilities of the slot machine licensee. The security plan must meet the minimum security requirements as determined by the commission under s. 551.103(1)(i) and be implemented prior to operation of slot machine gaming. The slot machine licensee’s facilities must adhere to the security plan at all times. Any changes to the security plan must be submitted by the licensee to the commission prior to implementation. The commission shall furnish copies of the security plan and changes in the plan to the Department of Law Enforcement.

(i) Create and file with the commission a written policy for:

1. Creating opportunities to purchase from vendors in this state, including minority vendors.

2. Creating opportunities for employment of residents of this state, including minority residents.

3. Ensuring opportunities for construction services from minority contractors.

4. Ensuring that opportunities for employment are offered on an equal, nondiscriminatory basis.

5. Training for employees on responsible gaming and working with a compulsive or addictive gambling prevention program to further its purposes as provided for in s. 551.118.

6. The implementation of a drug-testing program that includes, but is not limited to, requiring each employee to sign an agreement that he or she understands that the slot machine facility is a drug-free workplace.

The slot machine licensee shall use the Internet-based job-listing system of the Department of Economic Opportunity in advertising employment opportunities. Each slot machine licensee shall provide an annual report to the Florida Gaming Control Commission containing information indicating compliance with this paragraph in regard to minority persons.

(j) Ensure that the payout percentage of a slot machine gaming facility is at least 85 percent.

(5) A slot machine license is not transferable.

(6) A slot machine licensee shall keep and maintain permanent daily records of its slot machine operation and shall maintain such records for a period of not less than 5 years. These records must include all financial transactions and contain sufficient detail to determine compliance with the requirements of this chapter. All records shall be available for audit and inspection by the commission, the Department of Law Enforcement, or other law enforcement agencies during the licensee’s regular business hours.

(7) A slot machine licensee shall file with the commission a monthly report containing the required records of such slot machine operation. The required reports shall be submitted on forms prescribed by the commission and shall be due at the same time as the monthly pari-mutuel reports are due to the commission, and the reports shall be deemed public records once filed.

(8) A slot machine licensee shall file with the commission an audit of the receipt and distribution of all slot machine revenues provided by an independent certified public accountant verifying compliance with all financial and auditing provisions of this chapter and the associated rules adopted under this chapter. The audit must include verification of compliance with all statutes and rules regarding all required records of slot machine operations. Such audit shall be filed within 60 days after the completion of the permitholder’s pari-mutuel meet.

(9) The commission may share any information with the Department of Law Enforcement, any other law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over slot machine gaming or pari-mutuel activities, or any other state or federal law enforcement agency the commission or the Department of Law Enforcement deems appropriate. Any law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over slot machine gaming or pari-mutuel activities may share any information obtained or developed by it with the commission.

(10)(a)1. No slot machine license or renewal thereof shall be issued to an applicant holding a permit under chapter 550 to conduct pari-mutuel wagering meets of thoroughbred racing unless the applicant has on file with the commission a binding written agreement between the applicant and the Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, Inc., governing the payment of purses on live thoroughbred races conducted at the licensee’s pari-mutuel facility. In addition, no slot machine license or renewal thereof shall be issued to such an applicant unless the applicant has on file with the commission a binding written agreement between the applicant and the Florida Thoroughbred Breeders’ Association, Inc., governing the payment of breeders’, stallion, and special racing awards on live thoroughbred races conducted at the licensee’s pari-mutuel facility. The agreement governing purses and the agreement governing awards may direct the payment of such purses and awards from revenues generated by any wagering or gaming the applicant is authorized to conduct under Florida law. All purses and awards shall be subject to the terms of chapter 550. All sums for breeders’, stallion, and special racing awards shall be remitted monthly to the Florida Thoroughbred Breeders’ Association, Inc., for the payment of awards subject to the administrative fee authorized in s. 550.2625(3).

2. No slot machine license or renewal thereof shall be issued to an applicant holding a permit under chapter 550 to conduct pari-mutuel wagering meets of quarter horse racing unless the applicant has on file with the commission a binding written agreement between the applicant and the Florida Quarter Horse Racing Association or the association representing a majority of the horse owners and trainers at the applicant’s eligible facility, governing the payment of purses on live quarter horse races conducted at the licensee’s pari-mutuel facility. The agreement governing purses may direct the payment of such purses from revenues generated by any wagering or gaming the applicant is authorized to conduct under Florida law. All purses shall be subject to the terms of chapter 550.

(b) The commission shall suspend a slot machine license if one or more of the agreements required under paragraph (a) are terminated or otherwise cease to operate or if the commission determines that the licensee is materially failing to comply with the terms of such an agreement. Any such suspension shall take place in accordance with chapter 120.

(c)1. If an agreement required under paragraph (a) cannot be reached prior to the initial issuance of the slot machine license, either party may request arbitration or, in the case of a renewal, if an agreement required under paragraph (a) is not in place 120 days prior to the scheduled expiration date of the slot machine license, the applicant shall immediately ask the American Arbitration Association to furnish a list of 11 arbitrators, each of whom shall have at least 5 years of commercial arbitration experience and no financial interest in or prior relationship with any of the parties or their affiliated or related entities or principals. Each required party to the agreement shall select a single arbitrator from the list provided by the American Arbitration Association within 10 days of receipt, and the individuals so selected shall choose one additional arbitrator from the list within the next 10 days.

2. If an agreement required under paragraph (a) is not in place 60 days after the request under subparagraph 1. in the case of an initial slot machine license or, in the case of a renewal, 60 days prior to the scheduled expiration date of the slot machine license, the matter shall be immediately submitted to mandatory binding arbitration to resolve the disagreement between the parties. The three arbitrators selected pursuant to subparagraph 1. shall constitute the panel that shall arbitrate the dispute between the parties pursuant to the American Arbitration Association Commercial Arbitration Rules and chapter 682.

3. At the conclusion of the proceedings, which shall be no later than 90 days after the request under subparagraph 1. in the case of an initial slot machine license or, in the case of a renewal, 30 days prior to the scheduled expiration date of the slot machine license, the arbitration panel shall present to the parties a proposed agreement that the majority of the panel believes equitably balances the rights, interests, obligations, and reasonable expectations of the parties. The parties shall immediately enter into such agreement, which shall satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a) and permit issuance of the pending annual slot machine license or renewal. The agreement produced by the arbitration panel under this subparagraph shall be effective until the last day of the license or renewal period or until the parties enter into a different agreement. Each party shall pay its respective costs of arbitration and shall pay one-half of the costs of the arbitration panel, unless the parties otherwise agree. If the agreement produced by the arbitration panel under this subparagraph remains in place 120 days prior to the scheduled issuance of the next annual license renewal, then the arbitration process established in this paragraph will begin again.

4. In the event that neither of the agreements required under subparagraph (a)1. or the agreement required under subparagraph (a)2. are in place by the deadlines established in this paragraph, arbitration regarding each agreement will proceed independently, with separate lists of arbitrators, arbitration panels, arbitration proceedings, and resulting agreements.

5. With respect to the agreements required under paragraph (a) governing the payment of purses, the arbitration and resulting agreement called for under this paragraph shall be limited to the payment of purses from slot machine revenues only.

(d) If any provision of this subsection or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this subsection or chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this subsection are severable.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2005-362; s. 3, ch. 2007-252; s. 20, ch. 2009-170; ss. 4, 5, ch. 2010-29; s. 409, ch. 2011-142; s. 30, ch. 2021-271; s. 49, ch. 2022-7.

F.S. 551.104 on Google Scholar

F.S. 551.104 on Casetext

Amendments to 551.104

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 551.104

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 551.104.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ALMANZA, v. UNITED STATES,, 935 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, v. FLORIDA GREYHOUND ASSOCIATION, INC., 253 So. 3d 513 (Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 551.104(4)(c), Fla. . . .

SULLIVAN, v. PJ UNITED, INC., 362 F. Supp. 3d 1139 (N.D. Ala. 2018)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

MARRS, v. UNITED STATES,, 135 Fed. Cl. 155 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . . § 551.104 (2013) is the regulation that applies to the FLSA violations at issue in this suit. . . . Section 551.104 provides two relevant definitions. . . . United States, 57 Fed.Cl. 100, 109 (2003) (noting that section 551.104 is second ary to Richland Shoe . . . Instead, plaintiffs remain bound by Richland Shoe and cannot rely on section 551.104 to alter the Supreme . . . See 6 C.F.R. § 551.104. . . .

AMPONSAH, v. DIRECTV, LLC,, 278 F. Supp. 3d 1352 (N.D. Ga. 2017)

. . . . § 551.104). . . .

GRETNA RACING, LLC, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 225 So. 3d 759 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Section 551.104(1), Florida Statutes (2013), provides for the issuance by the Division of licenses “to . . . Under section 551.104(1), the Division is authorized to issue such licenses to an “eligible facility” . . . But section 551.104(2) goes on to establish an additional condition for the issuance of licenses: “An . . . So by its plain terms, section 551.104(2) limits licenses to facilities in counties where the voters . . . The Division ruled that the issuance of a license to Gretna Racing was foreclosed by section 551.104( . . .

E. PEREZ, v. OCEAN VIEW SEAFOOD RESTAURANT, INC. I. M., 217 F. Supp. 3d 868 (D.S.C. 2016)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

GRETNA RACING, LLC, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 178 So. 3d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Miami-Dade County,' Hialeah Race Track does not and could not qualify-for licensure pursuant to section 551.104 . . . of eligible facilities beyond the initial seven addressed in article X, . section 23 . and section 551.104 . . . The actual text of section 551.104(2) provides, however, that an “application may be approved by the . . . The Department’s reliance on sections 551.101 and 551.104(2) to deny Gretna Racing’s application 'is . . . in which Department Secretary Lawson requested the Attorney General’s views, states in part: Section 551.104 . . . By my reading of section 551.104(4), it did not. . . . In sum, little commends the reading that Gretna Racing places on section 551.104(2), and essentially . . . suggests, the Gadsden County vote was neither a “referendum” nor did it provide voter approval as section 551.104 . . .

MURRAY, v. BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION,, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1225 (N.D. Ala. 2016)

. . . . § 551.104. . . . “failure to make adequate inquiry into whether conduct is' in compliance with the Act.”.5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

MCCLENDON, v. UNITED STATES,, 127 Fed. Cl. 654 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . . § 551.104; and (3) controlled or required by the employer, e.g., 5 C.F.R. § 551.402(a). . . .

ALMANZA, v. UNITED STATES, 127 Fed. Cl. 521 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

PADILLA, On v. SHELDON RABIN, M. D. P. C. A M. D., 176 F. Supp. 3d 290 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . . § 551.104. “Mere negligence is insufficient.” Young, 586 F.3d at 207. . . . .

G. HAVRILLA, v. UNITED STATES, 125 Fed. Cl. 454 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . . § 551.104. . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (defining “suffered or permitted work” as “any work performed by an employee for . . .

GILBERT, v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, a, 625 F. App'x 370 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

ALAMO, v. UNITED STATES,, 122 Fed. Cl. 638 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . . § 551.104 (emphasis added). . . . specifically engaged in fire protection or law enforcement activities. 29 U.S.C. § 207; 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

JORDAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 122 Fed. Cl. 230 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

CLARK, v. CENTENE COMPANY OF TEXAS, L. P., 104 F. Supp. 3d 813 (W.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

KING, v. UNITED STATES,, 119 Fed. Cl. 277 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . Id. at § 551.104. . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104. . . . education, other educational institutions, and in certain circumstances, training facilities.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

TROUT, v. VILLAGE OF WESTMONT, a, 68 F. Supp. 3d 961 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

MARTIN, Jr. v. UNITED STATES,, 117 Fed. Cl. 611 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . . § 551.104; see also 29 U.S.C. § 213(a) (enumerating positions that are exempt from the FLSA). . . . Def.’s Mot. 28 (citing 5 C.F.R. § 551.104). . . .

DAVILA, v. MENENDEZ,, 717 F.3d 1179 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

WATKINS, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

SANTIAGO, v. UNITED STATES,, 107 Fed. Cl. 154 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . . § 551.104; see also Bull v. . . . the “failure to make adequate inquiry into whether conduct is in compliance with the Act.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . was prohibited by the Act or showed reckless disregard of the requirements of the Act.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

G. ABBEY, v. UNITED STATES,, 106 Fed. Cl. 254 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . . § 551.104. . . . means failure to make adequate inquiry into whether conduct is in compliance with the Act.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

G. ABBEY, v. UNITED STATES,, 99 Fed. Cl. 430 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . . § 551.104 (2011). . . . not coincide with the calendar week but may begin on any day and at any hour of a day.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

PENN- AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ZERTUCHE, v., 770 F. Supp. 2d 832 (W.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . §§ 551.053, 551.104(e). . . .

WHALEN, v. UNITED STATES,, 93 Fed. Cl. 579 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . . § 551.104 ("Hours of work means all time spent by an employee performing an activity for the benefit . . .

F. JACQUES, Jr. v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI- MUTUEL WAGERING, v., 15 So. 3d 793 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 551.104(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

G. JASTER, v. UNITED STATES,, 86 Fed. Cl. 731 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . . § 551.104, “[s]uffered or permitted work means any work performed by an employee for the benefit of . . .

JOHNSON, v. BIG LOTS STORES, INC., 604 F. Supp. 2d 903 (E.D. La. 2009)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

COOKE, v. UNITED STATES,, 85 Fed. Cl. 325 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . . § 551.104 (2008)); see also Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. . . . E.g., Angelo, 57 Fed.Cl. at 108 (citing 5 C.F.R. § 551.104). . . .

MORGAN, v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., 551 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 551.104). Family Dollar raises several challenges to the jury’s willfulness finding. All fail. . . .

G. ABBEY, v. UNITED STATES,, 82 Fed. Cl. 722 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . . § 551.104 (2006). Work not requested but suffered or permitted is work time. . . .

WALTERS, v. AMERICAN COACH LINES OF MIAMI, INC. a, 569 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . § 551.104). . . .

MORENO, Jr. v. UNITED STATES,, 82 Fed. Cl. 387 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . . § 551.104 (2000). . . . But see Bull, 68 Fed.Cl. at 272-74 (applying the “adequate inquiry” standard in 5 C.F.R. § 551.104). . . .

FLORIDA DIVISION OF PARI- MUTUEL WAGERING OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, J. v. FLORIDA STANDARDBRED BREEDERS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a, 983 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . It argued that the legislature’s failure to include Stan-dardbreds in subsection 551.104(10)(a), Florida . . . Division argues that the Association’s real complaint is with the parties’ interpretation of section 551.104 . . . , Inc., for the payment of awards subject to the administrative fee authorized in s. 550.2625(3). § 551.104 . . . Association maintains it is entitled to a portion of the Park’s slot machine proceeds under section 551.104 . . .

ALVAREZ PEREZ, v. SANFORD- ORLANDO KENNEL CLUB, INC. d. b. a. CCC, 515 F.3d 1150 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 551.104. Where the jury decides willfulness for statute of limitations purposes, see Fowler v. . . .

D. ASTOR, v. UNITED STATES,, 79 Fed. Cl. 303 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . . § 551.104 (same definition in the pre- and post-Oct.2007 regulations). . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (same definition in the pre- and post-Oct.2007 regulations) (defining “FLSA exemption . . . See 5 C.F.R. §§ 551.104, 551.206, 551.207(e) (pre-2007). . . . In the amended section 551.104, OPM defines the term “educational establishment” as “a nursery school . . . education, other educational institutions, and in certain circumstances, training facilities.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

ADAMS, v. UNITED STATES,, 78 Fed. Cl. 536 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . . § 551.104 (2007). . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (stating that the work must be of “enough importance that the employee’s actions . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (defining primary duty); Adams I, 27 Fed.Cl. at 13 (noting that the primary duty . . . Thus, plaintiffs’ work would have a “noticeable impact on the effectiveness” of HUD. 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (requiring all administrative work to “provide support to line managers”); Berg . . .

ADAMS, v. UNITED STATES,, 78 Fed. Cl. 556 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . . § 551.104 (2007). . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (stating that the work must be of “enough importance that the employee’s actions . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (defining primary duty); Adams I, 27 Fed.Cl. at 13 (noting that the primary duty . . . Thus, plaintiffs’ work would have a “noticeable impact on the effectiveness” of HHS. 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (requiring all administrative work to “provide support to line managers”); Berg . . .

UNITED STATES v. FISK,, 233 F. App'x 371 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Ins.Code § 551.104(b)(2). . . .

GOODMAN, W. v. HARRIS COUNTY, El, 239 F. App'x 869 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . The bicycle did not have on it the lights required by Texas Transportation Code § 551.104 for nighttime . . .

FAIRCHILD v. LIBERTY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 466 F. Supp. 2d 817 (E.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . . § 551.104(c). . . . Gov’t.Code Ann. § 551.104(b). . . . Gov’t Code Ann. § 551.104(c). . . .

W. BULL, v. UNITED STATES,, 68 Fed. Cl. 212 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . . § 551.104; accord Holzapfel v. . . . being performed and [must] ha[ve] an opportunity to prevent the work from being performed.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . Accord 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (requiring only that an employer “ha[ve] reason to believe” the employee is . . . willful violation, where the statute of limitations is three years. 29 U.S.C. § 255(a); 5 C.F.R. §§ 551.104 . . . Doe, 372 F.3d at 1361; 5 C.F.R. § 551.104. . . .

NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION NTEU v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY,, 418 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 551.104, 551.401(d). . . . activity for the benefit of the agency and under the control or direction of the agency.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

CHRISTOFFERSON, v. UNITED STATES,, 67 Fed. Cl. 68 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . . § 551.104 (2005). . . . Adams, 350 F.3d at 1223; see also 5 C.F.R. § 551.104. . . . Instead, it is our view that the distinction drawn by OPM in 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 between, on the one hand . . . “Discretion and independent judgment” is defined at 5 C.F.R. § 551.104, where the following limitations . . . its post-trial brief, for the first time, the government also argues that the portion of 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

H. GRANDITS, v. UNITED STATES,, 66 Fed. Cl. 519 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . . § 551.104 (Jan. 1, 2005). The parties have stipulated that Mr. . . . as deciding whether a situation does or does not conform to clearly applicable criteria. 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . production functions, means the work of employees who provide support to line managers.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . automated data processing, communications, or procurement and distribution of supplies. 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104. a. . . .

ADAMS, v. UNITED STATES,, 65 Fed. Cl. 195 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . . § 551.104 (2005). . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104. . . .

CHRISTOFFERSON, v. UNITED STATES,, 64 Fed. Cl. 316 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . . § 551.104 (2002) (codifying this standard). . . . Adams, 350 F.3d at 1223; see also § 551.104 (“This distinguishes supervisors from leaders who head temporary . . .

BATES, W. v. UNITED STATES,, 60 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . . § 551.104. . . . determinations furthering the operation of programs and accomplishment of program objectives.” 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . decisions made by employees who formulate policies or exercise broad commitment authority— 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . Under 5 C.F.R. § 551.104, “discretion and independent judgment” is defined as, “[W]ork that involves . . .

D. ADAMS, E. L. R. A. H. A. M. G. H. I. R. J. T. L. Jr. V. L. C. W. A. S. P. J. L. Jr. A. A. Jr. M. G. C. C. L. W. D. R. Jr. E. J. M. L. J. C. E. A. R. S. C. L. W. P. S. L. J. L. M. C. E. J. C. R. K. L. K. W. Jr. E. W. R. R. E. P. E. M. B. C. G. P. L. A. Jr. C. F. L. M. L. C. E. R. E. E. A. Jr. L. C. M. H. Jr. G. F. W. E. D. J. H. A. R. T. M. J. W. A. J. G. Jr. D. O. R. P. A. D. L. H. M. H. R. G. A. A. B. Jr. A. L. L. C. R. L. D. G. H. G. III, L. S. E. R. D. A. S. R. A. G. A. J. S. L. A. R. W. L. C. G. T. H. J. E. S. W. R. E. Jr. A. V. Jr. J. N. P. J. S. B. G. E. J. F. W. J. K. R. J. W. Jr. J. J. R. E. Jr. Jr. S. C. L. E. Jr. Jr. V. L. L. Ng, W. R. O H. A. J. G. B. A. A. G. A. G. J. R. R. C. C. C. Jr. Jr. C. A. M. A. E. Jr. F. A. T. J. F. A. G. D. J. D. L. A. A. Jr. A. O. W. D. E. Jr. M. M. M. R. S. W. D. L. E. D. B. W. T. A. J. M. J. B. J. B. Jr. M. Jr. R. D. R. B. P. A. E. K. J. H. M. F. v. UNITED STATES,, 350 F.3d 1216 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 551.104 (1999); plaintiffs do not contest this conclusion. . . .

D. ADAMS, E. L. R. A. H. A. M. G. H. I. R. J. T. L. Jr. V. L. C. W. A. S. P. J. L. Jr. A. A. Jr. M. G. C. C. L. W. D. R. Jr. E. J. M. L. J. C. E. A. R. S. C. L. W. P. S. L. J. L. M. C. E. J. C. R. K. L. K. W. Jr. E. W. R. R. E. P. E. M. B. C. G. P. L. A. Jr. C. F. L. M. L. C. E. R. E. E. A. Jr. L. C. M. H. Jr. G. F. W. E. D. J. H. A. R. T. M. J. W. A. J. G. Jr. D. O. R. P. A. D. L. H. M. H. R. G. A. A. B. Jr. A. L. L. C. R. L. D. G. H. G. III, L. S. E. R. D. A. S. R. A. G. A. J. S. L. A. R. W. L. C. G. T. H. J. E. S. W. R. E. Jr. A. V. Jr. J. N. P. J. S. B. G. E. J. F. W. J. K. R. J. W. Jr. J. J. R. E. Jr. Jr. S. C. L. E. Jr. Jr. V. L. L. Ng, W. R. O H. A. J. G. B. A. A. G. A. G. J. R. R. C. C. C. Jr. Jr. C. A. M. A. E. Jr. F. A. T. J. F. A. G. A. Jr. F. A. D. J. D. L. A. A. Jr. A. O. W. D. E. Jr. M. M. M. R. S. W. D. L. E. D. B. W. T. A. J. M. J. B. J. B. Jr. M. Jr. R. D. R. B. P. A. E. K. J. H. M. F. v. UNITED STATES,, 350 F.3d 1216 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 551.104 (1999); plaintiffs do not contest this conclusion. . . .

PALAY, v. UNITED STATES, 349 F.3d 418 (7th Cir. 2003)

. . . 551.100 (“Pretrial inmates will be separated, to the extent practicable, from convicted inmates.”), 551.104 . . .

ANGELO, Jr. v. UNITED STATES,, 57 Fed. Cl. 100 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . . § 551.104. . . .

D. RATLIFF, v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, TEXAS,, 256 F.3d 355 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 551.104(a) (2000). . . .

L. BERG, A. T. v. UNITED STATES,, 49 Fed. Cl. 459 (Fed. Cl. 2001)

. . . . § 551.104 (1998) (emphasis in original). . . . . § 551.104 (1998) (emphasis in original); see also the FPM Letter 551-7, attachment 1, paragraph B.l.a . . . , as in this case, to perform the primary duties of maintaining and repairing equipment. 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104. . . . This portion of FPM Letter 551-7 was codified in substantially the same language at 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 . . .

PALAY, v. UNITED STATES, 125 F. Supp. 2d 855 (N.D. Ill. 2000)

. . . . §§ 551.100, 551.104; cf. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)(pretrial detention order shall direct detainee be kept . . .

ADAMS, v. UNITED STATES,, 46 Fed. Cl. 616 (Fed. Cl. 2000)

. . . . § 551.104. As to Larry Caver, the evidence showed that he supervised only one employee. . . .

ADAMS, v. UNITED STATES,, 44 Fed. Cl. 772 (Fed. Cl. 1999)

. . . . § 551.104 (1999)). . . . See 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (1999). . . . See 62 Fed.Reg. at 67,246 (codified at 5 C.F.R. § 551.104 (1999)). . . . See id. § 551.104; see also discussion infra at 779-780. . . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. CITY OF ORANGE, TEXAS,, 905 F. Supp. 381 (E.D. Tex. 1995)

. . . . § 551.104 (Vernon 1994). . . .

E. FINLAN v. CITY OF DALLAS,, 888 F. Supp. 779 (N.D. Tex. 1995)

. . . . § 551.104. . Tex.Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 552.001 — 552.353. . Tex.Att'y Gen. ORD-495 (1988). . . . .