Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 560.405 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 560.405 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 560.405

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 560
MONEY SERVICES BUSINESSES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 560.405
560.405 Deposit; redemption.
(1) The deferred presentment provider or its affiliate may not present the drawer’s check before the end of the deferment period, except for a missed scheduled payment for a deferred presentment installment transaction that has not been otherwise deferred pursuant to s. 560.404(23), as reflected and described in the deferred presentment transaction agreement.
(2) Before a deferred presentment provider presents the drawer’s check, the check must be endorsed with the name under which the deferred presentment provider is doing business.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), in lieu of presentment, a deferred presentment provider may allow the check to be redeemed at any time upon payment of the outstanding transaction balance and earned fees. However, payment may not be made in the form of a personal check. Upon redemption, the deferred presentment provider must return the drawer’s check and provide a signed, dated receipt showing that the drawer’s check has been redeemed.
(4) A drawer may not be required to redeem his or her check in full before the agreed-upon date; however, the drawer may choose to redeem the check before the agreed-upon presentment date.
History.s. 13, ch. 2001-119; s. 46, ch. 2008-177; s. 3, ch. 2018-26.

F.S. 560.405 on Google Scholar

F.S. 560.405 on Casetext

Amendments to 560.405


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 560.405
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S560.405 - FRAUD - PROVIDER PRESENT DRAWER CHECK BEFORE DATE DUE - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

KALANTARI, a v. NITV, INC. a d b a TV a k a a k a a, 352 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 560.405. . . . reasons, we hold that a copyright assignment is an incidental transaction authorized by 31 C.F.R. § 560.405 . . . See 31 C.F.R. § 560.405. . . . . § 560.405. . . . These agreements are incidental transactions permitted by 31 C.F.R. § 560.405 and not prohibited by 31 . . .

BARNARD v. WABASH R. CO., 208 F.2d 489 (8th Cir. 1953)

. . . Appellant contends that this city ordinance is invalid because it conflicts with Section 560.405 RSMo . . .