Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 562.30 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 562.30 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 562.30

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Chapter 562
BEVERAGE LAW: ENFORCEMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 562.30
562.30 Possession of beverage prima facie evidence; exception.The possession by any person, except a licensed manufacturer or distributor, a state bonded warehouse, or a common carrier, of any beverage which is taxable under the Beverage Law, or which would be taxable thereunder if such beverage were manufactured in or brought into the state in accordance with the regulatory provisions thereof, and upon which the tax has not been paid, shall be prima facie evidence that such beverage has been manufactured, or is being sold, removed, or concealed with design to evade payment of such tax.
History.s. 10, ch. 19301, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4151(271r); s. 2, ch. 72-230.

F.S. 562.30 on Google Scholar

F.S. 562.30 on Casetext

Amendments to 562.30


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 562.30
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 562.30.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

RATTANCRAFT OF CALIFORNIA, Co. v. UNITED STATES, A. R. D., 336 F. Supp. 1401 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . In reappraisement R67/1241, they amounted to $562.30 or 39 percent of the purchase price; in reappraisement . . .

Co. v., 68 Cust. Ct. 303 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . In reappraisement R67/1241, they amounted to $562.30 or 39 percent of the purchase price; in reappraisement . . .

AMERICAN GAS ELECTRIC CO. v. UNITED STATES, 69 F. Supp. 614 (S.D.N.Y. 1946)

. . . November 23, 1943, plaintiff filed with the Collector a claim for the refund of $29,258.20 of the $35,-562.30 . . .

MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. KERN COUNTY GLEN FALLS INDEMNITY CO. v. KERN COUNTY, 83 F.2d 774 (9th Cir. 1936)

. . . aggregated $55,000, the withdrawals therefrom $45,000, leaving a credit on September 15, 1930, of $11,-562.30 . . .

WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO., 68 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1933)

. . . Co_ ffled a return reporting, its net income £or 1926 as $20,9B0, and upon this a tax of $2,-562.30 was . . .

AMERICAN SURETY CO. OF NEW YORK v. COVE IRR. DIST., 54 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1931)

. . . , $1,324, interest from February 1, 1923; Martin, $7,396.41, interest from December 5, 1922; Kurk, $562.30 . . .

W. L. FAIN GRAIN CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 68 Ct. Cl. 441 (Ct. Cl. 1929)

. . . counterclaim from the amount of damages sustained by plaintiff by reason of the breach of contract, we have $562.30 . . .

LAURENS TRUST CO., 3 B.T.A. 331 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . Bagwell_ 1, 562.30 Total 35, 939. 68 [41, 056. 37] In addition to the items above listed, the taxpayer . . .