Cases from cite.case.law:

HAYES ROBERTSON GROUP, INC. v. CHERRY,, 260 So. 3d 1126 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Initially, section 768.125 was to be numbered 562.51 to follow the "habitual drunkard" statute, section 562.50 . . . for serving a "habitual drunkard" was to be limited to a person convicted of a violation of section 562.50 . . . An amendment removed the conviction requirement and direct link to section 562.50, and the statute in . . . This statute, section 562.50, Florida Statutes (2018), was originally enacted in 1945. . . . ." § 562.50. Murphy v. S. Mut. Mgmt. Corp., 936 So.2d 786 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ; Gonzalez v. . . .

IN RE GRASSO,, 586 B.R. 110 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . Kaplan reviewed and adjusted for 1.5 375 $562.50 Schedules 3/4/12 Prepared revisions to draft Schedules . . . seeking to restrict Use of Cash Collateral or provide adequate protection; review loan documents 1.5 375 $562.50 . . . Prepared documents to permit WSFS Assignment to be recordable with Philadelphia Recorder of Deeds 1.5 375 $562.50 . . .

SUNDQUIST e v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. N. A. BAC LP, In e, 566 B.R. 563 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . The bank made one payment to the HOA for $562.50 and, contemporaneous with its decision to rescind the . . . That $5,696.61 includes, for example, “HOA fee $562.50,” which was the payment by Bank of America on . . . Internal Bank of America payment request dated 9/17/2010 to pay $562.50 HOA invoice dated 8/11/2010. . . .

In BOLTON. v., 466 B.R. 831 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2012)

. . . On March 31, 2008, Bolton incurred a service charge of $562.50. Id. . . .

In DE LA FUENTE, De La De La De La v. N. A., 430 B.R. 764 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Goott’s hourly rate is $225.00, which results in a value of $562.50 for her services rendered on February . . . The sum of $562.50 plus $812.50 is $1,375.00. . . .

R. WOODS- GASTON, v. SEQUOYAH ENTERPRISES, INC., 340 F. App'x 450 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . discretion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(d)(3) in compensating Sequoyah in the amount of $562.50 . . .

McKAY, v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 654 F. Supp. 2d 731 (E.D. Tenn. 2009)

. . . per hour, or $16,387.50; 6.5 hours of paralegal time to be compensated at a rate of $90 per hour, or $562.50 . . .

In LEE,, 394 B.R. 402 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2008)

. . . $4,082.50 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,600.00 $4,450.00 $5,562.50 $5,117.50 For each additional person add 450.00 562.50 . . .

In VERNON- WILLIAMS, Jr. D. IV, A, 377 B.R. 156 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2007)

. . . Leffler further testified that of the total $625.00 amount sought in the application, 90%, or $562.50 . . . 792.04 $2,292.04 85.27% Ranicki$1,500.00$1,767.00$3,267.00$1,178.06$2,678.06_81.97% Berryman $1,500.00 $ 562.50 . . .

In ENDO, v., 378 B.R. 281 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2006)

. . . Likewise, at the point in time when the monthly child support payments for Chañé of $562.50 are no longer . . . The payments of $562.50 per month for Chañé are nondischargeable child support payments in any event. . . . Once these payments are no longer required, however, $562.50 in additional disposable income will be . . .

In DULING, s s v. s, 360 B.R. 643 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2006)

. . . But of these fees, $562.50 must be disallowed straightaway because they are directly related to the filing . . .

HEDRU, v. METRO- NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD,, 433 F. Supp. 2d 358 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Raye represents that $562.50 of the $8,562.50 was incurred for a post-April 17, 2006 evaluation of data . . . Rosen did not seek the $562.50 for preparing an exhibit; he prepared a supplemental report, but the Court . . .

FIRESTINE v. PARKVIEW HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., 374 F. Supp. 2d 658 (N.D. Ind. 2005)

. . . 24 .3 85.00 25.50 07/02/04 10 1.3 225.00 292.50 07/06/04 10 .6 225.00 135.00 10/14/04 10 2.5 225.00 562.50 . . .

In OWENS CORNING,, 291 B.R. 329 (Bankr. D. Del. 2003)

. . . Thus, for each ton sold, Debtors would have incurred a loss of over $562.50 just for the plastic sheets . . .

In HASAN, 287 B.R. 308 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2002)

. . . of America (Louisville) HASAN, AMIN/MATEEN Attendance at pretrial; report re: orders T 4.50 125.00 562.50 . . .

H. FINK, v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 154 F. Supp. 2d 403 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Morik’s allotment, comes out to roughly two hours and thirty minutes, which, at $225 per hour, totals $562.50 . . .

In TOY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. FSB,, 256 B.R. 1 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . 1,406.25 10/25/89 731.25 10/25/89 581.25 10/25/89 116.25 11/20/89 1,406.25 11/20/89 731.25 11/20/89 562.50 . . . 09/26/89 $ 675.00 9 10/25/89 1,162.50 9 10/25/89 3,262.50 10/25/89 787.50 10/25/89 712.50 10/25/89 562.50 . . .

In FICK,, 249 B.R. 108 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2000)

. . . This amount included $562.50 listed as a “Surviving Spouse” payment. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LANKFORD, III,, 196 F.3d 563 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . release for a term of five years, a special assessment of $150 ($50 per count), and ordered to pay $562.50 . . .

CUNNINGHAM, v. GIBSON ELECTRIC CO. INC., 63 F. Supp. 2d 891 (N.D. Ill. 1999)

. . . the issue of fees (the time spent since May 14, 1999), though Gibson does challenge as unnecessary $562.50 . . .

In A. MORRISON,, 231 B.R. 754 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1999)

. . . Voorhies charged the Debtor $562.50 (2.5 hours) for attending the § 341 meeting of creditors. . . . He charged $562.50 for attending the § 341 meeting of creditors, also an excessive amount. . . .

In Re GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, 110 F.3d 1003 (4th Cir. 1997)

. . . Butler’s letter of August 30 2.5 sole 562.50 to Judge Thompson; conference with counsel re same; draft . . . 6.0 540.00 fourth circuit. 112Part. 1.5 375 Telephone calls; review and edit motion for order to 1.5 562.50 . . .

TEMPLE, v. S. AUJLA, M. D., 681 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The bartender claimed that such action violated section 562.50, Florida Statutes (1985), which states . . . guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree as punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. § 562.50 . . .

EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a a a a s a v. CHRISTOPHER, E. G. A., 942 F. Supp. 597 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)

. . . 900.00 10/14/92 [Gunther] 1,800.00 10/21/92 [Gunther] 225.00 11/9/92 [Gunther] 225.00 11/10/92 [Gunther] 562.50 . . .

a a a a s a v. E. G. A., 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1221 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)

. . . 900.00 10/14/92 [Gunther] 1,800.00 10/21/92 [Gunther] 225.00 mm2 [Gunther] 225.00 11/10/92 [Gunther] 562.50 . . .

In MEIS- NACHTRAB, MEIS- NACHTRAB, v. GRIFFIN,, 190 B.R. 302 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1995)

. . . Further, the Court finds that the Debtor is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $562.50 . . . Therefore, the Debtor shall be awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $562.50. . . .

PERSEN, v. SOUTHLAND CORPORATION,, 656 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 562.50, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . In Ellis, we were asked to determine whether written notice as required under section 562.50 was a requisite . . . sell, give away, dispose of, exchange, or barter” any alcoholic beverage to a habitual drunkard. § 562.50 . . .

In T. SEVITSKI, Jr. d b a, 161 B.R. 847 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1993)

. . . appearance on Ex Parte Application [among others] JP* P 0.50 125.00 12/27/91 Review mail and payables 2.25 562.50 . . .

ROSTER, v. MOULTON, Jr., 602 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . prior written notice of Moulton’s alcohol addiction, which they asserted was required under section 562.50 . . . trial court correctly ruled that there was no specific requirement for written notice under section 562.50 . . .

In PIONEER COMMERCIAL FUNDING CORPORATION a k a PCFC PIONEER COMMERCIAL FUNDING CORPORATION, v. APPLE BANK FOR SAVINGS,, 140 B.R. 951 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . as confirmation of our instructions dated October 31, 1989 to debit upon receipt of the wire, $221,-562.50 . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. McGURN,, 596 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1992)

. . . While the case was pending, the liquor license was sold for $23,-562.50, and the proceeds placed in an . . .

CORSAIR ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. v. MOSKOVITZ,, 142 F.R.D. 347 (N.D. Ga. 1992)

. . . Word Processing Plaintiffs’ bill of costs seeks $562.50 for word processing charges. . . .

ROMBERG v. NICHOLS R. D., 970 F.2d 512 (9th Cir. 1992)

. . . I In calculating the fee award, the district court first set a lodestar figure of $48,-562.50, representing . . .

ROMBERG, v. NICHOLS, R. D., 953 F.2d 1152 (9th Cir. 1992)

. . . I In calculating the fee award, the district court first set a lodestar figure of $48,-562.50, representing . . .

M. DECKER, v. NATIONAL FINANCIAL REALTY TRUST, d b a, 589 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . family member that the intoxicated person was addicted and a habitual drunkard as required by section 562.50 . . . court stated: [W]e hold that written notice as required to establish the criminal offense in section 562.50 . . .

ELLIS, v. N. G. N. OF TAMPA, INC., 586 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1991)

. . . that the bar had received written notice from the habitual drunkard’s family as required by section 562.50 . . . because prior written notice of Ellis’s alcohol addiction had not been provided, as required by section 562.50 . . . In reaching this conclusion, the district court of appeal determined that sections 562.50 and 768.125 . . . The district court also concluded that the written notice requirement under section 562.50 is a prerequisite . . . The criminal offense for sales to habitual drunkards is contained in section 562.50, Florida Statutes . . .

ELLIS, D. v. N. G. N. OF TAMPA, INC. G., 561 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . written notice from the habitual drunkard’s family required as a predicate to liability in section 562.50 . . . Our decision turns on our analysis of the relationship between section 562.50, found in the chapter titled . . . The two sections read as follows: 562.50 Habitual drunkards; furnishing intoxicants to, after notice. . . . Section 562.50 is primarily a criminal statute since it specifies that if a liquor vendor provides an . . . She urges us to reverse, first of all, because the class of persons to be protected under section 562.50 . . .

L. WRIGHT, III, v. UNITED STATES,, 19 Cl. Ct. 590 (Cl. Ct. 1990)

. . . mercury replacement thermostats are readily available, along with operating manuals, at a cost of $562.50 . . .

H. DUNHAM, A. v. SECRETARY OF DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 18 Cl. Ct. 633 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . 70.75 hrs@ $ 50/hr = 3,537.50 Linda Ward (paralegal) 1.00 hrs@ $ 50/hr = 50.00 Miscellaneous 7.50 hrs 562.50 . . . Finally, petitioners also claimed 7.5 hours for a total of $562.50 of “miscellaneous” activities. . . .

CURTIS MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. v. ACADEMY OF MOTION PICTURE ARTS AND SCIENCES,, 717 F. Supp. 1362 (S.D. Ind. 1989)

. . . $ 140.63 11/12/85 50 $281.25 12/2/85 50 $281.25 12/18/85 25 $ 140.63 1/8/86 40 $225.00 3/4/86 100 $562.50 . . .

S. MELROSE, v. SHEARSON AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC. a A. S., 120 F.R.D. 668 (N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . this issue is excessive and we award the plaintiffs fees based on the following: Wickert (4.5 hours = $562.50 . . .

In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 685 F. Supp. 1092 (D. Minn. 1987)

. . . Drexel-Moseley paid FTC $6,309,875 for the 715,000 shares of common stock and $18,001,-562.50 for the . . .

In CLAYTON,, 73 B.R. 141 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1987)

. . . Cooper represented Clayton at these sales and, as the closing documents reveal, he retained $562.50 per . . . What is not clear is .how Cooper arrived at the amount of $562.50 per closing to satisfy his fees. . . .

L. TREADWELL, Jr. v. KENNEDY, 656 F. Supp. 442 (C.D. Ill. 1987)

. . . Plaintiffs’ counsel has submitted an itemization of costs amounting to $562.50 based upon an hourly rate . . . The Defendants’ counsel, having signed the motions, is ordered to pay the Plaintiffs the sum of $562.50 . . .

J. H. PRITCHARD, v. JAX LIQUORS, INC., 499 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . that Jax had been provided with written notice that Hinnant was an habitual drunkard as required by § 562.50 . . . It found that § 562.50, which requires written notice as a prerequisite to imposition of any criminal . . . Pritchard contends that it is not necessary that § 562.50 and § 768.125 be read and construed in pari . . . Section 562.50 is a criminal statute which provides: Habitual drunkards; furnishing intoxicants to, after . . . Section 562.50 was enacted in 1945 and subjects the provider of alcohol to criminal liability for serving . . .

C. PRAY S. Jo- An K. Ba v. LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, FRIENDS FOR ALL CHILDREN, INC. v. LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, FRIENDS FOR ALL CHILDREN, INC. v. LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION,, 644 F. Supp. 1289 (D.D.C. 1986)

. . . Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ requested expense award will thus be reduced by $117,-562.50 from $780,540.90 . . .

DYSON, v. L. SPOSEEP, C., 637 F. Supp. 616 (N.D. Ind. 1986)

. . . of Indiana, counsel for the defendants, the sum of Five Hundred Sixty Two Dollars and Fifty Cents ($562.50 . . .

In D. LINEBERRY, TAYLOR, v. D. LINEBERRY,, 55 B.R. 510 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1985)

. . . as follows: The total indebtedness determined by the state court was $69,916.15; of this sum, $45,-562.50 . . .

SAVE OUR CUMBERLAND MOUNTAINS, INC. v. P. HODEL,, 622 F. Supp. 1160 (D.D.C. 1985)

. . . except rehearing) 80.00 $150 $12,000.00 1.1 $ 13,200.00 Rehearing Petition 2.50 $150 $ 375.00 1.5 $ 562.50 . . .

In LOOP HOSPITAL PARTNERSHIP,, 50 B.R. 565 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . Rate Amount JAW 11.25 50.00 $ 562.50 EJC 9.5 125.00 $1,187.50 PO 54.75 72.00 $4,106.25 GAT 5.25 472.50 . . .

A. McCLURE, v. MEXIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 750 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . requesting a total of $35,-993.76: 156.50 hours at $125 per hour, by her experienced chief of counsel ($19,-562.50 . . .

L. ROBERTS, v. ROMAN, 457 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . statute, see Migliore, 448 So.2d at 979, the requisites of the relevant criminal statute here, section 562.50 . . . Section 562.50 states in part: Any person who shall sell, ... any alcoholic beverage, ..., which produces . . .

In B. CHRISS,, 38 B.R. 655 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . Although counsel’s time sheets may justify the $16,-562.50 set forth in her application, the number of . . .

In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. LAMBERT v. FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, FTC FTC l Co. N. A. N. A. P. In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. FOX COMPANY. In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. ADAMS, Jr. T. Jr. M. In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. REAVIS McGRATH, 730 F.2d 1128 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Drexel-Moseley paid FTC $6,309,875 for the 715,000 shares of common stock and $18,001,-562.50 for the . . .

In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. LAMBERT v. FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, FTC FTC l Co. N. A. N. A. P. In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. FOX COMPANY. In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. ADAMS, Jr. T. Jr. M. In FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. REAVIS McGRATH, 730 F.2d 1128 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Drexel-Moseley paid FTC $6,309,875 for the 715,000 shares of common stock and $18,001,-562.50 for the . . .

SMEDBERG MACHINE TOOL, INC. v. J. DONOVAN,, 730 F.2d 1089 (7th Cir. 1984)

. . . Production Tool Corporation seeks $562.50 in attorneys fees and $22.75 in costs (Pl.Br. 6). . 5 U.S.C . . .

L. CROSBY O. v. FLEMING SONS, INC. a a, 447 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . future medical tests, $43,691.36 for past lost wages, $160,-300.77 for future lost wages, and $150,-562.50 . . .

McGILL, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 712 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1983)

. . . His award of $562.50 in attorney’s fees precipitated this appeal. . . .

PRESTON, v. THOMPSON, PRISONERS OF PONTIAC, v. THOMPSON,, 565 F. Supp. 310 (N.D. Ill. 1983)

. . . $1906.25 Gerald Block: 4.5 response to motion for stay 3.0 editing brief re bond 7.5 X $75/hour = $562.50 . . . Taylor $ 375.00 Motion for stay and for bond: Flint Taylor $ 218.75 David Thomas 1,906.25 Gerald Block 562.50 . . .

In FINE PAPER ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 98 F.R.D. 48 (E.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . Lotman 1168.7 $ 50.00 $ 58,435.00 $ 58,435.00 $197,062.50 Sarkin 0.0 0 0 0 $ 1,725.00 Tesoro 0.0 0 0 0 $ 562.50 . . .

In SLODOV,, 28 B.R. 698 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1983)

. . . Watkins in the amount of $34,-562.50. . . .

ESTATE OF G. BERG, G. v. UNITED STATES, 687 F.2d 377 (Ct. Cl. 1982)

. . . After the bonds were returned, the IRS valued the bonds in the estate at $496,-562.50, their fmv on decedent . . .

LONESTAR FLORIDA, INC. v. M. COOPER, d b a s, 408 So. 2d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . The statutes in effect at the time in question were Sections 562.11 and 562.50, Florida Statutes (1979 . . .

FIDELITY CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, v. SUPERIOR CASING CREWS, INC. v. LLOYDS UNDERWRITERS, 642 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . liability insurance issued to Continental, Fidelity was obligated and did pay the accrued interest of $41,-562.50 . . . Fidelity then sued Superior and Lloyds for reimbursement of the $41,-562.50 paid, plus attorneys’ fees . . .

In MULTIPONICS, INCORPORATED, FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK CITIBANK v. W. HERPEL, a X, 622 F.2d 725 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . In addition, Citibank and Multiponics entered into a second letter agreement whereby $440,-562.50, the . . .

In MULTIPONICS, INCORPORATED, FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK CITIBANK v. W. HERPEL, a X, 622 F.2d 725 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . In addition, Citibank and Multiponics entered into a second letter agreement whereby $440,-562.50, the . . .

R. L. POHLMAN COMPANY, v. KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC. a d b a, 399 F. Supp. 330 (E.D. Mo. 1975)

. . . That quantity of Blanks would have cost $52,-562.50 at the price of $.145 each, the defendant’s contract . . .

FELDMAN, v. NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH AMERICA,, 511 F.2d 465 (2d Cir. 1975)

. . . In 1973, however, after National had received $440,-562.50 in post-petition payments over more than two . . .

PORTLAND FISH COMPANY, a v. STATES STEAMSHIP COMPANY, a, 510 F.2d 628 (9th Cir. 1974)

. . . plaintiff, deposited an irrevocable letter of credit with a Manila bank, authorizing payment to seller of $562.50 . . .

JUSTICE v. BOARD OF EDUCATION,, 351 F. Supp. 1252 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)

. . . “ 237.50 3 3550 “ 295.83 3 4 4250 “ 354.17 5 4900 “ 408.33 6 5550 “ 462.50 7 6150 “ 512.50 8 6750 “ 562.50 . . .

STATE v. WADSWORTH,, 210 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1968)

. . . See § 562.50, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. prohibiting the supplying of alcoholic beverages to a person “habitually . . .

QUAKER CITY IRON WORKS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 256 F. Supp. 450 (E.D. Pa. 1966)

. . . the results in the above examples are as follows: In Example 1 — The plaintiff would pay a tax of $562.50 . . . operating at a loss and Fruehauf and Heil maintain a wholesale price of $6000. . 75% of $7500. is $562.50 . . .

v., 44 T.C. 261 (T.C. 1965)

. . . . $156.25 $283.31 $439.56 $500,000-. 1,406.25 1,442.31 2,848.56 Total-1, 562.50 1,725.62 3,288.12 G refunded . . .

SMITHER COMPANY, a v. CALVIN- HUMPHREY CORPORATION, a a, 232 F. Supp. 204 (D.D.C. 1964)

. . . supervision” (in the amount of $1,171.10) “could” be a duplication of the charge (in the amount of $562.50 . . .

COWDEN, Sr. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. COWDEN, Sr., 289 F.2d 20 (5th Cir. 1961)

. . . purchased and affixed to the Stanolind lease internal revenue documentary tax stamps in the amount of $562.50 . . .

YELLOWSTONE PIPE LINE COMPANY, a v. KUCZYNSKI,, 283 F.2d 415 (9th Cir. 1960)

. . . By the release of July 6th plaintiff acknowledged receipt of $562.50, as follows: “ * * * in full settlement . . .

Sr. v., 32 T.C. 853 (T.C. 1959)

. . . lease United States internal revenue documentary tax stamps in face amount and at a cost to them of $562.50 . . .

K. v. v., 31 T.C. 211 (T.C. 1958)

. . . petitioners’ taxable income from a publication called “Fiddler’s Green” for the year 1954 by the amount of $562.50 . . . During the year 1954, sales of “Fiddler’s Green” produced royalties for Gann in the total amount of $562.50 . . . for the year 1954 the royalties earned by “Fiddler’s Green” during the year 1954 in the amount of $562.50 . . . did not receive in 1954 any part of the $8,196.63 ($11,558.46 minus $3,361.83) or any part of the $562.50 . . . But, like the $8,196.63 and $562.50 discussed above, Gann, under the March 10, 1954, contract, had no . . .

THE WESTERN AND SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 143 Ct. Cl. 460 (Ct. Cl. 1958)

. . . 1,444.10) WF-26... () 10/17/46 10/17/46 12/30/46 4,162.50 WF-27... 9/21/46 9/30/46 11/ 7/46 11/26/46 562.50 . . .

W. NORTHUP, v. UNITED STATES J. P. W. HINE, v. UNITED STATES C. USHER, v. J. GRAHAM,, 137 F. Supp. 268 (D. Conn. 1955)

. . . Newman & Sons, Inc. 125 shares of preferred stock of that corporation for $6,-562.50. . . .

MONOLITH PORTLAND MIDWEST COMPANY, a v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION, a, 128 F. Supp. 824 (S.D. Cal. 1955)

. . . . & Wash. office expense 8,766.79 7,030.13 1,736.66 (d) Misc. expense 1,581.12 1,018.62 562.50 (e) Land . . . (d) Miscellaneous expenses: One claim of $562.50 was disallowed. . . .

v., 12 T.C. 287 (T.C. 1949)

. . . 1936,1937, 1938, 1939_$405, 000.00 Average for four years_ 101,250.00 125 per cent of average_ 126, 562.50 . . .

GAYNOR v. GAYNOR, 3 Fla. Supp. 49 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1948)

. . . For support of the children the defendant was to pay-$562.50 per month from June 1, 1947 to August 1, . . .

MARKS v. UNITED STATES, 58 F. Supp. 182 (Ct. Cl. 1944)

. . . had become worthless and that in that year he had lost his entire investment in it amounting to $141,-562.50 . . .

MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. KANSAS CITY, MO., 128 F.2d 998 (8th Cir. 1942)

. . . From the former, $562.50 was received by the auditor within three years prior to October 12, 1940; from . . .

HARTFORD ACCIDENT INDEMNITY CO. v. CITY OF SULPHUR, OKL. CITY OF SULPHUR, OKL. v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT INDEMNITY CO., 123 F.2d 566 (10th Cir. 1941)

. . . Carr, a commissioner, the sum of $562.50 which had been applied, $174.65 to the claims allowed on May . . . it had collected from the surety on the bond of Hugh Cushenberry, another commissioner, the sum of $562.50 . . . that it had collected from the surety on the bond of Ernest Ball, a third commissioner, the sum of $562.50 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MOLASKY,, 118 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1941)

. . . .$ 562.50 Interest...................... 89.55 Taxes ....................... 300.00 Depreciation .... . . . gross income to be $119,-960.96, and claiming deductions as follows : Rent on Business Property.....$ 562.50 . . .

MARTIN v. CITY OF PORT HURON, 111 F.2d 759 (6th Cir. 1940)

. . . Wyeth as provided $3937.50, $5937.50, $ 562.50 8, Reimbursement for cost of transportation and living . . .

S. v., 37 B.T.A. 1198 (B.T.A. 1938)

. . . General Motors, Com at 41.125_$2, 323, 562.50 10,000 shrs. . . . shares of General Motors is $7,062.50, and one-eighth above on 4,500 shares of Kennecott Copper is $562.50 . . .

MANN v. ANDERSON,, 20 F. Supp. 643 (S.D.N.Y. 1937)

. . . that the Government has sustained its defense, then the taxpayer at least is entitled to a refund of $562.50 . . . taxpayer is entitled to the interest thereon from March 15, 1930, to March 15, 1931, which amounts to $562.50 . . .

H. v. v., 36 B.T.A. 184 (B.T.A. 1937)

. . . this agreement, and Simon pays upon the execution hereof Five Hundred Sixty-two and 50/100 Dollars ($562.50 . . .

v., 35 B.T.A. 1186 (B.T.A. 1937)

. . . 7y2 years, petitioner computed a depreciation allowance for each of the years 1931, 1932 and 1933 of $562.50 . . .

QUINN v. JALOFF, 71 F.2d 707 (9th Cir. 1934)

. . . claim from the above entitled estate for the period of occupancy * * * by- * * * Receiver, the sum of $562.50 . . .

HUASTECA PETROLEUM CO. v. BAGS OF COFFEE, 60 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1932)

. . . The estimated contribution of cargo to the expenses of the Warbler amounting only to $562.50 Avas based . . .

W. B. J., 103 Fla. 135 (Fla. 1931)

. . . March 1, 1929, in equal amounts of $18,750.00 and made payable in 10 years, with interest notes of $562.50 . . . alleges two defaults on part of appellant; (1) Failure to pay the two first interest' coupon notes of $562.50 . . . National Bank of Tampa where the said notes were made payable, two certified checks each in the sum of $562.50 . . .

BROWN- CRUMMER INV. CO. v. KOSS CONST. CO., 4 F.2d 682 (8th Cir. 1925)

. . . Accordingly, on December 12th, the defendant remitted its cheek for $562.50 in payment of the discount . . . Defendant demanded that plaintiff return the sum of $562.50 paid to plaintiff as discount on the third . . .

RAVITZ v. HAMILTON,, 272 F. 721 (W.D. Ky. 1921)

. . . 50.00 Penalty ...1. 12.50 Penalty ... 1... 500.00 $562.50 All of this, the bill asserts, was based upon . . .

JAMES REES SONS CO. JAMES REES SONS CO. v. PITTSBURGH CINCINNATI PACKET LINE, 237 F. 555 (3d Cir. 1916)

. . . Kerr a tax settlement in tbe sum of $562.50. . . .

THE CRETIC, 224 F. 216 (D. Mass. 1914)

. . . . $562.50. White Star Line, • Per Sweezey & Kelsey. See note at end of case. . . .

COOPER v. NEWTON, 160 F. 190 (C.C.S.D. Ga. 1908)

. . . Butts, is entitled to a credit of all the 94 monthly installments, aggregating the sum of $562.50, upon . . .