The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . See § 588.15, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
. . . In order to fulfill that purpose, the Act included provisions in section 588.15 that made the livestock . . . Moreover, as evident by the provisions of sections 588.14 and 588.15, Florida Statutes (2008), the Legislature . . . Baker, 184 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966) (“Section 588.15 ... must be read in pari mate-ria with . . . provision, Section 588.14, which lays down the owner’s duty, the negligent breach of which, under Section 588.15 . . .
. . . . § 588.15, Fla. Stat. . . . Section 588.15 now provides ''[ejvery owner of livestock who intentionally, willfully, carelessly, or . . .
. . . 588.01, Florida Statutes, could be considered as evidence of the defendant’s negligence under section 588.15 . . .
. . . 735 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), but rather, liability arises only upon a showing of negligence: 588.15 . . . be liable in damages for all injury and property damage sustained by any person by reason thereof. § 588.15 . . .
. . . bull which the Scharbers had negligently allowed to stray onto the roadway in violation of section 588.15 . . . — No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state. 588.15 . . .
. . . without supporting affidavits or other proof, but relying solely on the argument that sections 588.14 and 588.15 . . . Florida law is clear that sections 588.14 and 588.15 do not impose strict liability on the owner of livestock . . . Section 588.15, Florida Statutes (1997) provides: Liability of owner. — Every owner of livestock who . . .
. . . least negligence is required to establish liability against a livestock owner under sections 588.14 and 588.15 . . . livestock owners strictly liable, the legislature opted instead for a showing of at least negligence: 588.15 . . . appealed to this Court, arguing that his equal protection rights had been violated because section 588.15 . . . The legislature has left section 588.15 intact following Selby and we are just as bound today as we were . . . to address: Presumably, the Legislature had all the alternatives before it when it enacted Section 588.15 . . .
. . . If the majority members of this court are interested in revising section 588.15, Florida Statutes, then . . . Section 588.15, Florida Statutes, provides that an owner who negligently permits their livestock to run . . . I find that the negligence required in section 588.15 may be established by finding that the Wynnses . . . — No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state. 588.15 . . .
. . . . § 588.15(a). . . .
. . . appellant’s case was based on general allegations of negligence and violations of sections 588.14 and 588.15 . . .
. . . . § 588.15, Fla.Stat. (1983); Visingardi v. Tirone, 193 So.2d 601 (Fla.1966). . . .
. . . . § 588.15, Fla.Stat. . . .
. . . entered after a pre-trial hearing and upon appellants’ “Motion As To Constitutionality of Florida Statute 588.15 . . . ”, passed upon the validity of Section 588.15, Florida Statutes, 1971, giving this Court jurisdiction . . . Florida Statute 588.15 provides as follows: “. . . . . . . The crux of this appeal is the constitutionality of Section 588.15, Florida Statutes F.S.A. . . . Presumably, the Legislature had all the alternatives before it when it enacted Section 588.15. . . . Section 588.15, F. . . . Section 588.15, F.S.A.) considered in the light of its history and purpose, should not be “watered” down . . .
. . . . §§ 588.14 and 588.15, F.S.A. which are a compilation of §§ 3 and 4 of Ch. 25236, General Laws of 1949 . . . No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state.” “588.15 . . . Upon appeal the 3rd District Court, after quoting F.S. §§ 588.14 and 588.15, F.S.A., supra, and adverting . . . Baker was sued for violating F.S. § 588.15, F.S.A., and upon trial the Circuit Court directed verdict . . .
. . . appellee was negligent by not keeping the fence in proper condition under Florida Statutes §§ 588.14, 588.15 . . .
. . . The first statutory provision (Section 588.15) thus cited and invoked in the complaint reads as follows . . . Section 588.15, quoted above, must be read in pari materia with the preceding provision, Section 588.14 . . . , which lays down the owner’s duty, the negligent breach of which, under Section 588.15, makes the owner . . . Sections 588.14 and 588.15 are, respectively, Sections 3 and 4 of Chapter 25236, Laws of Florida, Acts . . . We are aided in our construction of Section 588.15 by two decisions of our sister district courts of . . .
. . . Appellant urges that sections 588.14 and 588.15, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., were violated and evidence of this . . . No owner shall permit livestock to run at large on or stray upon the public roads of this state.” “588.15 . . .
. . . See specifically §§588.14 and 588.15, Florida Statutes; Bryant v. City of Tampa, Fla. . . .
. . . Section 588.15 reads as follows: “Every owner of livestock who intentionally, wilfully, carelessly or . . . Section 588.15 does not, of course, exempt defendant from liability for its own negligence, even though . . .
. . . hospital and medical services; and that the total of these expenses at the time of the trial was only $4,'588.15 . . . The evidence shows that while the ap-pellee had actually incurred only this $4,-588.15 at the time of . . .