The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 604
GENERAL AGRICULTURAL LAWS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 604.01

604.01 Statewide soil survey and mapping; declaration of policy.—A thorough and careful survey and mapping of the soils of Florida is hereby declared as a matter of legislative policy, basic to:

(1) The development of intelligent research programs on the agricultural potentialities of the soils of the state;

(2) The organization of effective soil conservation and land use planning programs;

(3) Agricultural extension and home demonstration work;

(4) Highway and secondary road planning;

(5) Establishment of equitable land tax assessments;

(6) Agricultural teaching;

(7) The development of a sound body of helpful agricultural information for nationwide distribution to prospective landowners; and

(8) A number of other social and agricultural enterprises of broad public interest.

History.—s. 1, ch. 20454, 1941.

F.S. 604.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 604.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 604.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 604.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 604.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

A. JENKINS, v. IMMEDIA, INC. a, 389 F. Supp. 3d 925 (D. Colo. 2019)

. . . . § 604.01. . . . Stat. § 604.01. . . . Stat. § 604.01, subd. 1 ). . . . Stat. § 604.01, subd. 1a. . . . Stat. § 604.01, subd. 1a. . . .

B. DIAMOND, LLP, v. HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, B. LLP, v. LLP, B. LLP, v. LLP, B. LLP, v. LLP, B. LLP, v. LLP, B. LLP, v. LLP, B. LLP, v. LLP, B. LLP, v., 883 F.3d 1140 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . Code § 29-604.01(k)). . . .

ALEMAYEHU, v. ABERE,, 298 F. Supp. 3d 157 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Code § 29-604.01(b) ("Each partner shall be entitled to an equal share of the partnership profits."). . . . Id. at § 29-604.01(k). . . .

J. SMITH v. HEALTH RESOURCES OF ARKANSAS, INC., 656 F. App'x 790 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . Specifically, HRA failed to deposit a June 2012 401k loan payment of $604.01 and two employee contributions . . .

QUEEN, v. Ed SCHULTZ,, 747 F.3d 879 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . D.C.Code § 29-604.01(b); see also Robinson v. Nussbaum, 11 F.Supp.2d 10, 15 (D.D.C.1997). . . .

BERGER, v. C. HORNE, L., 525 F. App'x 543 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . children in the first degree, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-3551, 13-3553, and 13-604.01 . . . each conviction, with the terms to run consecutively as mandated by Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-604.01 . . .

BALL, v. L. RYAN, 494 F. App'x 760 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 13-604.01 (renumbered § 13-705), and that his sentences for the two videotapes did not exceed that . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ- APARICIO,, 648 F.3d 749 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . minor’s teacher or clergyman or priest,” to add subsection C, and to substitute § 13-705 for "§ 13-604.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ- APARICIO,, 663 F.3d 419 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . minor's teacher or clergyman or priest,” to add subsection C, and to substitute "§ 13-705” for "§ 13-604.01 . . .

LIMON- ROBLES, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 424 F. App'x 689 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . , based on his 1987 conviction for violating Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-1405, 1401, 3821, 1001, 604.01 . . .

ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. SWENSON, T. M. L. T. B. L. T. J. L. T. M. L. Co- Co- P., 276 F.R.D. 278 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . . § 604.01, subd. la (defining “fault”), and record evidence clearly establishes that the Washington . . .

ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. SWENSON, ESTATE OF LEE T. M. L. T. B. L. T. J. L. T. M. L. Co- Co- P., 687 F. Supp. 2d 884 (D. Minn. 2009)

. . . Defendants, on the other hand, rely on section 604.01, subd. la, which expressly defines “fault.” . . .

SMITH, Jr. v. SCHRIRO,, 238 F. App'x 215 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 13-604.01. . . .

In GUIDANT CORP. IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATORS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Jr. v., 489 F. Supp. 2d 932 (D. Minn. 2007)

. . . . § 604.01. . . .

FERNANDEZ- RUIZ, v. R. GONZALES,, 466 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . ): “Domestic violence” means any act which is a dangerous crime against children as defined in § 13-604.01 . . .

RIVAS- GOMEZ, v. R. GONZALES,, 441 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 13-604.01(C) (2004) (setting the presumptive sentence for the first-time offender convicted of sexual . . .

ATKIN, v. L. STEWART,, 62 F. App'x 173 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . §§ 13-3553(A)(2) and 13-604.01. . . . minor under fifteen qualifies as a “dangerous crime against children” (“DCAC”), Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-604.01 . . .

DUNCAN, v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., 203 F.R.D. 601 (W.D. Wash. 2001)

. . . . § 604.01 (2000). . . .

T. H. S. NORTHSTAR ASSOCIATES, v. W. R. GRACE AND COMPANY,, 66 F.3d 173 (8th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 604.01, subd. la (“ ‘Fault’ includes ... unreasonable assumption of risk not constituting an express . . .

PIOTROWSKI v. SOUTHWORTH PRODUCTS CORPORATION,, 15 F.3d 748 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . Applying Minnesota’s comparative fault statute, see Minnesota Statute § 604.01 (1992), the district court . . .

CHRISTINSON v. BIG STONE COUNTY CO- OP, A, 13 F.3d 1178 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . Sections 604.01, et seq. . By agreement of the parties, the case was tried by the Honorable J. . . .

RAMSTAD v. LEAR SIEGLER DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a, 836 F. Supp. 1511 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . . § 604.01, subd. 1 (1988). . . .

McKINNIE, v. LUNDELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., 825 F. Supp. 834 (W.D. Tenn. 1993)

. . . . § 604.01(1a) . . . .

SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a v. OVERTON,, 992 F.2d 640 (7th Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 604.01-04 (1982). . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, F. A. v. DELOITTE TOUCHE, a a, 834 F. Supp. 1129 (E.D. Ark. 1992)

. . . . § 604.01 (1988) (emphasis added), while under the Arkansas statute, a party claiming damages may recover . . .

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, F. A. v. GREENWOOD, Jr. M. P. Sr. F. J. J. E. E. K. K., 798 F. Supp. 1391 (D. Minn. 1992)

. . . . § 604.01 (“Fault” includes “unreasonable failure to avoid an injury or to mitigate damages”). . . .

ANOKA ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES, P. A. P. A. P. A. Dr. J. Dr. E. Dr. H. v. G. MUTSCHLER G. J. LECHNER E. J. J. D. v. Dr. J. COOLEY Dr. E. Dr. H. Mr. E. P. A., 773 F. Supp. 158 (D. Minn. 1991)

. . . . § 604.01. . . . Comparative Negligence Defendants urge the court to apply the comparative fault principles under Minn.Stat. § 604.01 . . .

HUNT, v. I. MAGNELL, L. R., 758 F. Supp. 1292 (D. Minn. 1991)

. . . . § 604.01, for the principle that "a plaintiff [must] establish that the defendant's negligence or fault . . .

F. WALSH, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 130 F.R.D. 260 (D.D.C. 1990)

. . . . § 604.01 (West Supp.1988), to breach of warranty claim to reduce consequential damages). . . . .

ERICKSON, v. WHIRLPOOL CORP., 731 F. Supp. 1426 (D. Minn. 1990)

. . . Comparative Fault Statute Minnesota’s comparative fault statute, § 604.01, subdivision 1, provides in . . . Minnesota Statutes, § 604.01, subdivision 1. . . . , however, finds that plaintiff’s view of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s general interpretation of § 604.01 . . . The Minnesota Supreme Court, itself, has indicated any expansion of § 604.01 may not be accomplished . . . Minnesota has not adopted a pure comparative fault exception to § 604.01. . . .

DUROSKO, v. A. LEWIS, 882 F.2d 357 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 13-604.01 (1982) (now § 13-604.02 (1985)) that Durosko committed the robberies while on release status . . .

COCIO, v. BRAMLETT,, 872 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . was sentenced to life imprisonment under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated § 13-604.02 (formerly 13-604.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BURNSIDE,, 831 F.2d 868 (9th Cir. 1987)

. . . under fifteen years of age, sexual assault is a class 2 felony and is punishable pursuant to Sec. 13-604.01 . . .

OTTEM, C. OTTEM, Ad v. UNITED STATES v. A. PETERSON, 594 F. Supp. 283 (D. Minn. 1984)

. . . . § 604.01. The evidence also indicates that Peterson operated his vehicle in a reasonable manner. . . .

Jo RYAN, a RYAN, v. McDONOUGH POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. v. DOMBROVSKI,, 734 F.2d 385 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . . §§ 604.01 Subd. la, 604.02 Subd. 1 (West 1984 Pocket Part). . . .

GRANT, v. CITY OF DULUTH, a, 672 F.2d 677 (8th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 604.01, subd. 1 (1978). . . .

M. JOHNSON, v. NIAGARA MACHINE TOOL WORKS, a, 666 F.2d 1223 (8th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 604.01 (West Supp. 1981), “[i]f there is ‘evidence of conduct which, if believed by the jury, would . . .

LeSUEUR CREAMERY, INC. a v. HASKON, INC. a a, 660 F.2d 342 (8th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 604.01 (1969). . . . Minn.Stat. §§ 604.01, 604.01, la (1978). . . .

L. NERENHAUSEN, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a v. WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE COMPANY, CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT DIVISION,, 479 F. Supp. 750 (D. Minn. 1979)

. . . . § 604.01, subd. la (“fault” includes an “unreasonable failure to avoid an injury . . . .”). B. . . . Minn.St. § 604.01, subd. la (“fault” includes an “unreasonable failure to avoid an injury . . .”). . . .

D. PITTS, v. ELECTRO- STATIC FINISHING, INC., 607 F.2d 799 (8th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 604.01 (1969) (amended 1978), as it was written prior to the effective date of amendatory legislation . . . Minn.Stat.Ann. § 604.01(1) (1978) (amending Minn.Stat. § 604.-01 (1969)). . . . .

F. DAVIS, W. v. O. OBERHOLTZER a, 588 F.2d 243 (8th Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 604.01(1). I. . . . Minn.Stat.Ann. § 604.01(1) states in part: Contributory negligence shall not bar recovery in an action . . . Minn.Stat.Ann. § 604.01(1), supra. . . .

R. JOHNSON, v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, MILGO INDUSTRIAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, R., 586 F.2d 1291 (8th Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 604.01(1). . . . Minn.Stat.Ann. § 604.01(1). . . . Ann. § 604.01(1). . . . .

G. GREENWOOD, a v. McDONOUGH POWER EQUIPMENT, INC., 437 F. Supp. 707 (D. Ark. 1977)

. . . . § 604.01 subd. 5; Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat., Art. 2212a, § 2(e). . . .

BENTON, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,, 430 F. Supp. 1380 (D. Kan. 1977)

. . . . § 604.01. . . .

K. TIEDEMAN, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a, 513 F.2d 1267 (8th Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 604.01 (1969), governs the substantive negligence issues involved. . . .

MEYER, a k a W. F. v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,, 508 F.2d 1395 (8th Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 604.01 (Supp.1974). . . .

GILBERTSON, v. TRYCO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., 492 F.2d 958 (8th Cir. 1974)

. . . . § 604.01 subd. 1) and in response to the New Jersey decision of Meistrich v. . . .

F. MONTES, v. BETCHER d b a, 480 F.2d 1128 (8th Cir. 1973)

. . . Sec. 604.01 (1969), is determinative absent a showing that there was no evidence to support it. . . .

F. SARGENT, v. AXEL H. OHMAN, INCORPORATED, a, 343 F. Supp. 316 (D. Minn. 1972)

. . . . § 604.01 Subd. 1 or otherwise, of the percentage of negligence attributable to each. . . .

SMITH, B. B. B. v. UNITED STATES, 334 F. Supp. 185 (D. Minn. 1971)

. . . . § 604.01. . . .

R. SCHIEK B. v. DULUTH HEATING AND SHEET METAL SUPPLY COMPANY, 53 F.R.D. 401 (D. Minn. 1971)

. . . . § 604.01. Since there was no evidence adduced at the trial to support plaintiff Clem R. . . .

OLSON, v. KILSTOFTE AND VOSEJPKA, INC. a RED WING SHOE COMPANY, a v. GEORGE W. OLSEN CONSTRUCTION CO., 327 F. Supp. 583 (D. Minn. 1971)

. . . . § 604.01 it was directed to determine the percentage of negligence on the part of Red Wing Shoe Company . . .

GAGNIER, L. v. BENDIXEN, 439 F.2d 57 (8th Cir. 1971)

. . . . § 604.01 (1969), and the jury rendered a verdict finding the railroad 60 percent negligent and the . . .

ROSS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 169 F.2d 483 (1st Cir. 1948)

. . . . $707.22 1937 ..................... 592.72 1938 ..................... 604.01 1939 .................. . . .