Cases from cite.case.law:

COHEN, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 311 F. Supp. 3d 242 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Code § 1-606.02(b) (stating that "[a]ny performance rating, grievance, adverse action or reduction-in-force . . .

HILL, v. GRAY,, 28 F. Supp. 3d 47 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . Code § 1-606.02; Washington v. . . . Code § 1-606.02; Washington, 538 F.Supp.2d at 275-76. . . .

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 796 F. Supp. 2d 136 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . . § 1-606.02(a)(2), regarding final agency decisions, including RIFs. Id. § l-606.03(a). The D.C. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARCUCCI, v. v., 299 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . modern times the grand jury has lost much of its independent force.” 24 MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 606.02 . . . MOORE ET AL., MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 606.02[1] (3d ed. 2002) (“Still, the grand jury can reflect . . .

CANTERINO, v. W. WILSON,, 546 F. Supp. 174 (W.D. Ky. 1982)

. . . .-640, 501 K.A.R. 2:010, IMD 606.02. . . .

JONES, v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, St., 241 F. Supp. 531 (E.D. Mo. 1965)

. . . The plaintiff instituted this suit, seeking in Count 1 a refund of cabaret taxes in the amount of $606.02 . . . The plaintiff thereafter paid $606.02, being the tax demand for the quarter ending March 31, 1956, together . . . refund of the amount paid, which claim was disallowed, and this action was brought to recover the said $606.02 . . . Plaintiff is entitled to her refund of $606.02 in cabaret taxes assessed against the sales of her package . . .