Cases from cite.case.law:

Jo- YAU, v. IWDWARRIORS, CORP. A d b a a, 144 So. 3d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . days later, Yau filed an amended motion for reconsideration and mentioned, for the first time, section 607.1904 . . . brief is the statutory argument, presented in her amended motion for reconsideration, that section 607.1904 . . . both within and without Florida over the decades (and is reflected in the first portion of section 607.1904 . . . mentioned less frequently in the case-law as the former, is reflected in the second portion of section 607.1904 . . . to its interests be permitted to set up the lack of such legal organization in his or her defense. § 607.1904 . . .

CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. v. COHEN LLC LLC LLC, 883 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . In arguing the issue, the opposing parties invoke Section 607.1904, Florida Statutes, as determinative . . . The second main clause of Section 607.1904 is the subject of the parties’ argument. . . . As a result, F.S. 607.1904 does not apply ... . . . Notwithstanding reports to the contrary in some authorities, Florida’s Section 607.1904 is not adapted . . . Section 607.1904 derives almost verbatim from Section 36 of Chapter 1639, Laws of Florida (1868). . . .