Cases from cite.case.law:

JOHNSON, v. OMEGA INSURANCE COMPANY,, 200 So. 3d 1207 (Fla. 2016)

. . . In addition, Colella alleged that State Farm acted in “bad faith” as defined in section 624.11, Florida . . .

MI WINDOWS DOORS, LLC, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 88 F. Supp. 3d 1326 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . ) contains no provision overriding Florida's usual choice-of-law rules, the plaintiffs cite Section 624.11 . . . The plaintiffs argue that under Section 624.11(1) "Chapter 624 [in its entirety and] by its own terms . . . In short, Section 624.11(1) concerns only Chapter 624’s "applicable provisions,” but Florida's choice-of-law . . . Seidman, which applied to “any civil action for damages filed in the courts of [Florida],” Section 624.11 . . .

UNITED STATES T. WILSON, v. GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT C. B. Jr., 777 F.3d 691 (4th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 624.1-624.11. . . .

INTERSTATE FIRE CASUALTY COMPANY, v. ABERNATHY, LLC,, 93 So. 3d 352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See §§ 624.11 & 624.401, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . . .

STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, v. COLELLA,, 95 So. 3d 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Trade Practices Act, section 626.9541(1), Florida Statutes (2006), and for “bad faith” under section 624.11 . . .

In BARBUTES,, 436 B.R. 518 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2010)

. . . Line 26 Home Maintenance and High Utilities The debtors claim $624.11 in additional expenses to maintain . . . Barbutes’ testimony verified, that the majority of the $624.11 adjustment constitutes “maintenance” expenses . . . Barbutes’ own proof, of the $624.11 sought as an adjustment, $169.61 is attributable to utilities, and . . .

UNITED STATES T. WILSON, v. GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT C. B. Of Of Jr. T. v. C. B. Jr., 528 F.3d 292 (4th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 624.1-624.11 (2008). . . .

ALL STATE FLORIDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION,, 981 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” • Section 624.11(1), Florida Statutes— Providing that “[n]o person shall transact insurance in this . . . See § 624.11(1), Fla. Stat.; § 624.318(2), Fla. Stat.; § 624.418(2)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 624.11(1), Fla. Stat.; § 624.318(2), Fla. Stat.; § 624.418(2)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. . . .

MACK, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 914 So. 2d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Mack violated sections 624.11(1), 626.611(5), (7), (8), (9) and (13), 626.621(2), (3) and (12), 626.9521 . . . Mack violated, among other provisions, sections 624.11(1), 626.611(5), (7), (8), and (13), 626.621(2) . . .

FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES, 207 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (N.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . A at 11 (citing §§ 624.11, 624.424, 624.316, 624.3161). . . .

PASTOR, v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 184 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Section 624.11(1) of the Florida Statutes provides, “No person shall transact insurance in this state . . . First, it is important to note that Fla.Stat. § 624.11(1) qualifies the governance of the Insurance Code . . . of law exercise is that Florida law applies, then Fla.Stat. § 624.115 will be “applicable” under § 624.11 . . . Section 624.11(1) does not “clearly and plainly specify” that the legislature intended to abrogate the . . . Absent such a clear expression, this court will not construe Fla.Stat. § 624.11(1) as an abrogation of . . .

AMARNICK, M. D. v. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, 643 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 624.11(1), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that “[n]o person shall transact insurance in this . . .

SNELL R. a a a v. TUNNELL D., 920 F.2d 673 (10th Cir. 1990)

. . . DHS Child Welfare Services-Child Abuse/Preventive Services Procedures § 624.11 (10/1/84), reproduced . . . Id. § 1104.1(A) (West 1987); DHS Child Welfare Services-Child Abuse/Preventive Services Procedures § 624.11 . . . attorney has discretion whether to file petition or pursue criminal charges), § 623.7(D) (same), § 624.11 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, v. NATIONAL AMUSEMENT PURCHASING GROUP, INC., 905 F.2d 361 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 624.11(2) (risk retention groups, organized under the provisions of the Act and properly licensed . . .

SHAPIRO, v. ASSOCIATED INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a CALIFORNIA CLUB, INC. a v. ASSOCIATED INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 899 F.2d 1116 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 624.11(1) (West 1984). . . .

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF RETIRED PERSONS, v. DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE,, 553 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . that NFRP’s proposed activities would transact insurance without a license in violation of section 624.11 . . .

CRESPO v. FIREMAN S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY,, 37 Fla. Supp. 2d 128 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . Florida Statute §624.11(1) (1982) provides that “no person shall transact insurance in this state . . . . .

UNITED STATES HENDRY CORPORATION, v. SMITH ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a, 240 F. Supp. 189 (N.D. Fla. 1965)

. . . . § 624.11, F.S.A., that: “No person shall transact insurance in Florida, or relative to a subject of . . .

, 118 Ct. Cl. 625 (Ct. Cl. 1951)

. . . Bulger_ 1, 624.11 Lawrence I. Bundy_ 586.24 Edward J. Byrne_ 770.34 James D. . . .

v., 30 B.T.A. 691 (B.T.A. 1934)

. . . of additions to or betterments of petitioner’s property: 1928_$40,161.56 1929_ 37, 273. 33 1930_ 36, 624.11 . . .

IN THE MATTER OF SOLA HIJO, S. EN C. BANKRUPTS, 6 P.R. Fed. 352 (D.P.R. 1913)

. . . 1,550.30 Hermogenes Jimenez. 1,334.00 Lorenzo Jimenez Soto. 306.00 American West Indies Trading Co. 624.11 . . .