Cases from cite.case.law:

. . . Fla.Stat. (1984). 626.734. . . . Barrett’s insistence that §§ 626.795 and 626.734 impact only shareholders and officers who hold insurance . . . insurance agents, such as Florida General, and their officers and shareholders are directly subject to §§ 626.734 . . .

. . . necessary to note that this case was charged and tried on the premise that the 1989 version of section 626.734 . . . Pursuant to Section 626.734, Florida Statutes, as a licensed general lines insurance agent and corporate . . . superior for the acts of another as a matter of law under the Department’s construction of section 626.734 . . . Section 626.734, Florida Statutes, 1989, states: Any general lines insurance agent who is an officer, . . . Respondent relies on the action taken by the Legislature in the 1990 session whereby Section 626.734 . . . was no requirement that it prove appellant had knowledge of his employee’s misconduct under section 626.734 . . . Section 626.734, Florida Statutes (1989), states Any general lines insurance agency who is an officer . . . unnecessary for us to address the retroactive applicability of ch. 90-363 § 70, Laws of Fla., which amended § 626.734 . . .

. . . Section 626.734, Florida Statutes (1985) provides: Corporations, liability of agent. — Any general lines . . .

. . . Hartnett, Sr. on the basis of Section 626.734, Florida Statutes (1981). . . . Hartnett was predicated on the provisions of Section 626.734, Florida Statutes (1981). . . . Hartnett argued inter alia that Section 626.734 was unconstitutional for vagueness, overbreadth and lack . . . Section 626.734 provides: Any general lines insurance agent who is an officer, director, stockholder, . . . Section 626.734 conveys a sufficiently definite warning to those subject to its provisions what conduct . . .