Cases from cite.case.law:

KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. v. DOUGHTY, 242 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 672.714(2), (3), Fla. Stat. (2014) ; Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc. v. . . . With respect to that issue, section 672.714(2) provides as follows: The measure of damages for breach . . .

MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CORP. v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,, 209 So. 3d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See §§ 672.714, 672.715, Fla. Stat. (2010); Miles v. . . .

ARMADILLO DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISES, INC. v. HAI YUN MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS MANUFACTURE CO. LTD., 142 F. Supp. 3d 1245 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 672.714 and 672.715. . . . Stat. §§ 672.714 and 672.715; Halliburton Co. v. . . . Stat. § 672.714, it is entitled to direct damages in the amount of $41,384.44, which was the amount paid . . . Stat. § 672.714. , The affidavit of Ross Sacco supports the claim that Armadillo paid $41,384.44 for . . .

EXIM BRICKELL LLC, a v. PDVSA SERVICES INC. a S. A. a, 516 F. App'x 742 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . Stat. section 672.714(1) allows that: “Where the buyer has accepted goods and given notification ... . . .

D. SMITH, v. WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY,, 663 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 672.714. . . .

PAUL GOTTLIEB CO. INC. v. ALPS SOUTH CORPORATION,, 985 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 672.714-.715. . . . See §§ 672.714-.715; Twyman v. Roell, 123 Fla. 2, 166 So. 215 (1936). . . .

SKYLINE COMPUTER CORPORATION, a v. ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION, a a, 699 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . For this reason, we do not reach the question of whether damages are recoverable under sections 672.714 . . .

HALLIBURTON COMPANY, v. EASTERN CEMENT CORPORATION,, 672 So. 2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . §§ 672.714 and 672.715, Fla.Stat. (1995); see also Hadley v. . . . Section 672.714(2) states that the measure of general damages is the difference between the value of . . . Section 672.714(3) provides that incidental and consequential damages may be recovered “in a proper case . . .

KOPLOWITZ, a k a A. d b a v. GIRARD,, 658 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Kavanaugh, 350 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); §§ 672.714(3), 672.715(2) Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

FRANK GRIFFIN VOLKSWAGEN, INC. a v. T. SMITH,, 610 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . §§ 672.714-.715, Fla.Stat. (1987) (UCC §§ 2-714 to -715). . . .

B. P. DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. P. LAFER ENTERPRISES, INC., 538 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . See §§ 672.313, 672.608, 672.714, and 672.717, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

BILL WALLACE FORD, INC. v. LAMOUREAUX, 33 Fla. Supp. 2d 47 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1988)

. . . . § 672.714(2), Fla. Stat. (1987); Lawson v Turner, 404 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). . . . . § 672.714(3), Fla. . . .

HIKES, v. McNAMARA PONTIAC, INC., 510 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . These two measures of damages are somewhat codified in the Uniform Commercial Code as sections 672.714 . . .

B. NYQUIST v. RANDALL,, 819 F.2d 1014 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 672.714(1) and denied defendant’s request for an instruction regarding cover. . . . However, § 672.714 gives a remedy for “damages for any non-conformity of tender the loss resulting in . . . Additionally, plaintiffs' broad interpretation of § 672.714 would render the cover obligation in § 672 . . . Section 672.714 expressly provides that a buyer who has accepted goods "may recover as damages for any . . . Rather, they sought damages for non-conformity as provided in §~ 672.714 and 672.715. . . .

E. PARSONS G. v. MOTOR HOMES OF AMERICA, INC., 465 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . revocation of acceptance — Section 672.608; and (6) damages for breach in regard to accepted goods — Section 672.714 . . . Reid, 250 Ark. 176, 465 S.W.2d 80 (1971). . § 672.714, Fla.Stat. (1981), provides: 672.714 Buyer’s damages . . .

CHANNING d b a v. COLONIAL PRESS OF MIAMI, INC. a, 457 So. 2d 588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . or implied warranties as to the quality of the goods, thus affecting their value pursuant to Section 672.714 . . .

CEDARS OF LEBANON HOSPITAL CORP. v. EUROPEAN X- RAY DISTRIBUTORS OF AMERICA, INC. A. B., 444 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Sections 672.714 and 672.715 provide the measure of damages for the breach of these warranties. . . .

PENNINGTON GRAIN AND SEED, INC. a v. TUTEN a L. a, 422 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . warranties or limited damages to less than that provided by the Uniform Commercial Code in Sections 672.714 . . .

LAWSON, v. H. G. TURNER,, 404 So. 2d 424 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . The damages for breach of the implied warranty of title are set forth in Section 672.714(2) and (3), . . .

ADAM METAL SUPPLY, INC. a v. ELECTRODEX, INC. a, 386 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Consequently, under Section 672.714, Florida Statutes (1979), it was entitled to damages for the nonconforming . . . It should be noted that in applying Section 672.714(2), we have used the' value of the aluminum after . . . determine that it was not Coilzak, mandates that result and makes it perfectly proper under Section 672.714 . . . Thus, ap-pellee suffered incidental damages in that amount as permitted by Section 672.714(3). . . .

USA F u B o VULCAN MATERIALS, v. VOLPE CONSTRUCTION, 622 F.2d 880 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . .-610, 672.711, 672.714, UCC §§ 2-610, 2-711, 2-714, or alternatively for failure to perform a severable . . .

BILL BRANCH CHEVROLET, INC. v. T. REDMOND,, 378 So. 2d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Section 672.714(3), Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .

CARTER HAWLEY HALE STORES, INC. v. J. CONLEY,, 372 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . This constitutes notice under Section 2-714 of the Uniform Commercial Code [Section 672.714, Florida . . . Section 672.714(2), Florida Statutes. “11. . . . See: Section 672.714, Florida Statutes (1971), the section under which this action was brought. . . .

ESTATE C. HARPER H. H. E. D. v. ORLANDO FUNERAL HOME, INC. d b a, 366 So. 2d 126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . (See F.S. 672.314; F.S. 672.315; F.S. 672.714 and F.S. 672.715). . . .

MILES, W. L. v. F. KAVANAUGH,, 350 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Sections 672.714(3), 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1975); Council Bros., Inc. v. . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a v. NORTH AMERICAN STEEL CORPORATION, a, 335 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . or should have discovered any breach notify the seller of breach or be barred from any remedy; and “672.714 . . .