Cases from cite.case.law:

MAGNUM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CORP. v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,, 209 So. 3d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See §§ 672.714, 672.715, Fla. Stat. (2010); Miles v. . . .

ARMADILLO DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISES, INC. v. HAI YUN MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS MANUFACTURE CO. LTD., 142 F. Supp. 3d 1245 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 672.714 and 672.715. . . . Stat. §§ 672.714 and 672.715; Halliburton Co. v. . . . Stat. § 672.715(1). . . . Stat. § 672.715(2). In Nyquist v. . . . Randall, 819 F.2d 1014 (11th Cir.1987) the Eleventh Circuit interpreted § 672.715(2) to mean that (1) . . .

NATURE S PRODUCTS, INC. v. NATROL, INC. FCC v. s FCC v., 990 F. Supp. 2d 1307 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Rather, NPI has conflated those claims, arguing only that recovery is precluded under Florida Statutes § 672.715 . . . Stat. § 672.715). . . . Florida Statutes § 672.715 defines "consequential damages" under Florida law, providing, in relevant . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, LLC, f. k. a., 522 F. App'x 699 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . the contract price together with any incidental or consequential damages as hereinafter defined (s.672.715 . . . the contract price together with any incidental and consequential damages provided in this chapter (s.672.715 . . .

EXIM BRICKELL LLC, a v. PDVSA SERVICES INC. a S. A. a, 516 F. App'x 742 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . Stat. section 672.715(1), a buyer is entitled to recover incidental and consequential damages including . . .

COOPER, v. MERIDIAN YACHTS, LTD. a M Y MEDUSE, a a a De B. V. d. b. a. F. De NA, d. b. a. d. b. a. De B. V., 575 F.3d 1151 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 672.715(2). . . .

PAUL GOTTLIEB CO. INC. v. ALPS SOUTH CORPORATION,, 985 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 672.715(1). Therefore, the trial court may award Alps its direct and incidental damages. . . .

HGI ASSOCIATES, INC. v. WETMORE PRINTING COMPANY, a, 427 F.3d 867 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 672.715(2). . . . Stat. § 672.715. . . . Stat. § 672.715(2)(a). . . . Lost profits typically fall under the category of consequential damages and we have applied § 672.715 . . . According to § 672.715(2)(a), we must limit HGI’s lost profits recovery unless it could not reasonably . . .

FRYATT v. LANTANA ONE, LTD., 866 So. 2d 158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 672.715(1),(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . See § 672.715(1),(2), Fla. Stat. . . .

PREMIX- MARBLETITE MANUFACTURING CORP. v. SKW CHEMICALS, INC., 145 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (S.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . . § 672.715. . . .

SKYLINE COMPUTER CORPORATION, a v. ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION, a a, 699 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . reason, we do not reach the question of whether damages are recoverable under sections 672.714 and 672.715 . . .

HALLIBURTON COMPANY, v. EASTERN CEMENT CORPORATION,, 672 So. 2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Having so decided, we added: “under section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1989), the buyer can recover both . . . consequential damages, which in a proper case may be an amalgam of some or all three. §§ 672.714 and 672.715 . . . otherwise; and (b) injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty.” § 672.715 . . . The claimed loss clearly would not constitute “incidental” damages under section 672.715(1). . . . injury to person or property proximately resulting from [the] breach of warranty” permitted by section 672.715 . . .

KOPLOWITZ, a k a A. d b a v. GIRARD,, 658 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Kavanaugh, 350 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); §§ 672.714(3), 672.715(2) Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

GATSBY SPAS, INC. v. DOUGLASS SCREEN PRINTERS, INC., 613 So. 2d 568 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1991). . . .

FRANK GRIFFIN VOLKSWAGEN, INC. a v. T. SMITH,, 610 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . of acceptance was not proved, he is not entitled to an award of consequential damages under section 672.715 . . .

EASTERN CEMENT, v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY,, 600 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Additionally, under section 672.715, Florida Statutes (1989), the buyer can recover both incidental and . . .

In SAV- A- STOP INCORPORATED, SAV- A- STOP INCORPORATED, v. MAYFAIR SUPER MARKETS, INC., 119 B.R. 317 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . the contract price together with any incidental or consequential damages as hereinafter defined (s. 672.715 . . . contract price together with any incidental and any consequential damages provided in this chapter (§ 672.715 . . . Both sections provide the opportunity to seek consequential and incidental damages under § 672.715. . . . Section 672.715(2) defines consequential damages as “any loss resulting from general or particular requirements . . . Section 672.715(2). Mayfair has not established this evidence. . . .

FLORIDA MINING MATERIALS CORP. a v. STANDARD GYPSUM CORP. a, 550 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . aggrieved buyer may recover consequential damages for a seller’s breach of contract (sections 672.713-672.715 . . .

PAN AMERICAN STONE CO. INC. a v. L. A. MEISTER,, 527 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . .” § 672.715(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). We reverse and remand for a new trial on all issues. . . .

BILL WALLACE FORD, INC. v. LAMOUREAUX, 33 Fla. Supp. 2d 47 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1988)

. . . .” § 672.715(2)(a) Fla. Stat. (1987). . . . Comment 6 to § 672.715 provides as follows: In the case of sale of wares to one in he business of reselling . . .

BAIR d b a v. A. E. G. I. S. CORPORATION d b a, 523 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Under the remedy provision section 672.715(1) Bair is entitled to recover incidental damages which “include . . . 7 Kan.App.2d 676, 647 P.2d 820 (1982) (applying the same U.C.C. provision as adopted under section 672.715 . . . Pursuant to section 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1985), consequential damages include: (a) Any loss . . .

B. NYQUIST v. RANDALL,, 819 F.2d 1014 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 672.715(2)(a) (West 1966). . . . Such damages are properly covered by section 672.715, which states that "consequential damages ... include . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 672.715 precludes recovery of consequential damages only where the loss could “reasonably . . . Section 672.715 specifically refers to losses that could not be avoided “by cover or otherwise." . . . Rather, they sought damages for non-conformity as provided in §~ 672.714 and 672.715. . . .

CEDARS OF LEBANON HOSPITAL CORP. v. EUROPEAN X- RAY DISTRIBUTORS OF AMERICA, INC. A. B., 444 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Sections 672.714 and 672.715 provide the measure of damages for the breach of these warranties. . . .

PENNINGTON GRAIN AND SEED, INC. a v. TUTEN a L. a, 422 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . or limited damages to less than that provided by the Uniform Commercial Code in Sections 672.714 or 672.715 . . .

HARTMAN, v. OPELIKA MACHINE AND WELDING COMPANY, 414 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 672.715(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) (UCC 2.715(2)(b)). . . .

L. GOODELL v. K. T. ENTERPRISES, LTD., 394 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . the contract price together with any incidental or consequential damages as hereinafter defined (s. 672.715 . . .

BILL BRANCH CHEVROLET, INC. v. T. REDMOND,, 378 So. 2d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Section 672.715(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). See Council Brothers, Inc. v. . . .

ESTATE C. HARPER H. H. E. D. v. ORLANDO FUNERAL HOME, INC. d b a, 366 So. 2d 126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . (See F.S. 672.314; F.S. 672.315; F.S. 672.714 and F.S. 672.715). . . .

MILES, W. L. v. F. KAVANAUGH,, 350 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Sections 672.714(3), 672.715(2), Florida Statutes (1975); Council Bros., Inc. v. . . .