The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 672.719

672.719 Contractual modification or limitation of remedy.—

(1) Subject to the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) of this section and of the preceding section on liquidation and limitation of damages:

(a) The agreement may provide for remedies in addition to or in substitution for those provided in this chapter and may limit or alter the measure of damages recoverable under this chapter, as by limiting the buyer’s remedies to return of the goods and repayment of the price or to repair and replacement of nonconforming goods or parts; and

(b) Resort to a remedy as provided is optional unless the remedy is expressly agreed to be exclusive, in which case it is the sole remedy.

(2) Where circumstances cause an exclusive or limited remedy to fail of its essential purpose, remedy may be had as provided in this code.

(3) Consequential damages may be limited or excluded unless the limitation or exclusion is unconscionable. Limitation of consequential damages for injury to the person in the case of consumer goods is prima facie unconscionable but limitation of damages where the loss is commercial is not.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254.

Note.—s. 2-719, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.719 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.719 on Casetext

Amendments to 672.719

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 672.719

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 672.719.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC LITIGATION., 233 F. Supp. 3d 776 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . . § 672.719(2); 810 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2-719(2); Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 106, § 2-719; N.Y. U.C.C. . . .

GILBERT CADDY, P. A. v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A., 193 F. Supp. 3d 1294 (S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . Stat. 672.719(1)(a), (3)). . . .

IN RE RUST- OLEUM RESTORE MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 155 F. Supp. 3d 772 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . . § 672.719(1); Ga. Code § 11-2-719(1); Idaho Code § 28-2-719(1); 810 ILCS 5/2-719(1); Ind. . . .

COOPER, v. MERIDIAN YACHTS, LTD. a M Y MEDUSE, a a a De B. V. d. b. a. F. De NA, d. b. a. d. b. a. De B. V., 575 F.3d 1151 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 672.719 (“Consequential damages may be limited or excluded unless the limitation or exclusion is . . .

DAVID, v. AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION, 629 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 672.719 (“The agreement may provide for remedies ... in substitution for those provided in this chapter . . . Stat. § 672.719; Griffis v. . . . Mincom, Inc., 2007 WL 1222595 (M.D.Fla. 2007) (holding that § 672.316 and § 672.719 stand for the principle . . .

CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, v. AVIOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 990 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 672.719, Fla. Stat. (1999); Metro. Dade County v. . . .

PAUL GOTTLIEB CO. INC. v. ALPS SOUTH CORPORATION,, 985 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 672.719; Council Bros., Inc. v. . . .

JET SALES OF STUART, LLC, a v. JET CONNECTION TRAVEL, GMBH, a, 240 F. App'x 839 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . Jet Sales argues that a remedy is optional under Florida Statutes Section 672.719(1)(b) unless the Agreement . . . Section 672.719(1)(b) states, “Resort to a remedy as provided is optional unless the remedy is expressly . . .

BAILEY, v. MONACO COACH CORPORATION,, 350 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (N.D. Ga. 2004)

. . . . § 672.719(l)(a). . . . Ann. § 672.719(2). . . .

LENNAR HOMES, INC. v. MASONITE CORPORATION,, 32 F. Supp. 2d 396 (E.D. La. 1998)

. . . . §§ 672.316(4), 672.719(3); see also Action Orthopedics, Inc. v. . . . See Fla.Stat. 672.719. . . . See Fla.Stat. § 672.719(2). . . . See Fla.Stat. § 672.719 Official Comment (“[I]f the parties intend for a written warranty to prescribe . . .

SKYLINE COMPUTER CORPORATION, a v. ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION, a a, 699 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See §§ 672.719(2), (3),-Fla. Stat. (1995); James J. White and Robert S. . . .

MAYOR S JEWELERS, INC. d b a MAYOR S JEWELERS, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM,, 685 So. 2d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Buyer invoked section 672.719(2), Florida Statutes (1975), in the Florida Uniform Commercial Code. . . .

FRANK GRIFFIN VOLKSWAGEN, INC. a v. T. SMITH,, 610 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 672.719, Florida Statutes, authorizes the parties to a contract to provide for remedies in addition . . . As stated in Section 672.719(2), Florida Statutes (1987) (UCC § 2-719(2)): “Where circumstances cause . . . And section 672.719(2) (UCC § 2-719(2)) provides that "[w]here circumstances cause an exclusive or limited . . .

ACTION ORTHOPEDICS, INC. v. TECHMEDICA, INC., 759 F. Supp. 1566 (M.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . . §§ 672.718, 672.719, Fla.Stat. (1986); Lafayette Stabilizer Repair, Inc. v. . . .

E. PARSONS G. v. MOTOR HOMES OF AMERICA, INC., 465 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . erred in ruling the warranty notice provision was a limitation of remedy provision pursuant to Section 672.719 . . . the trial court’s ruling that the warranty notice provision was a limitation of remedy under Section 672.719 . . . The court found the provisions of Section 672.719, Florida Statutes (here reproduced at fn. 5) applicable . . . Aucilla River Naval Stores Co., 103 Fla. 605, 137 So. 886 (1931). . § 672.719, Fla.Stat. (1981), provides . . . : 672.719 Contractual modification or limitation of remedy.— (1) Subject to the provisions of subsections . . .

RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. WARE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 445 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 1983)

. . . property, and the clause seeking to limit liability should have been enforced as permitted by section 672.719 . . . prima facie unconscionable and should have been given effect absent a showing of unconscionability. § 672.719 . . .

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a INTERFORM, INC. a v. ORR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a a, 427 So. 2d 237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 672.719, Florida Statutes (1981) allows contractual agreements to provide for limitations of . . . Section 672.719(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

PENNINGTON GRAIN AND SEED, INC. a v. TUTEN a L. a, 422 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . We reject Pennington’s theory based on Sections 672.316 and 672.719, that the “warranty” printed on each . . . Similarly, we would agree with Pennington that Section 672.719(l)(b) permits a limitation of damages . . .

HI NEIGHBOR ENTERPRISES, INC. a E. A. H. v. BURROUGHS CORPORATION, a, 492 F. Supp. 823 (N.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . .-316(4) and 672.719, Fla.Stat. (1977). Such agreements are enforceable. . . .

C. VARNER, v. B. L. LANIER FRUIT CO. INC., 370 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Absent a finding of unconscionability, the grower may still find relief in Section 672.719(2), Florida . . .

TAMPA FARM SERVICE, INC. v. CARGILL, INC., 356 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 672.719(2), Florida Statutes (1975) (Section 2-719[2] of the UCC). . . . Section 672.719(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1975). . . . Section 672.719(2), Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

ORANGE MOTORS OF CORAL GABLES, INC. v. DADE COUNTY DAIRIES, INC. a, 258 So. 2d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . provided for a remedy agreed to by the parties, thus, plaintiff was foreclosed from rescission under § 672.719 . . .