Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE W. BRIDGEFORTH, J. III, v. W., 571 B.R. 669 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2017)

. . . The Debtor has totaled this amount at $686.60. . . .

IN RE W. CRIPPS E. W. E. v. P., 566 B.R. 172 (W.D. Mich. 2017)

. . . days later, on December 9, 2015, Dietrich Law filed its final fee application, seeking an additional $686.60 . . .

IN RE W. CRIPPS E. In A. L., 549 B.R. 836 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2016)

. . . First, it requests that the court award the Applicant compensation in the amount of $686.60 for the period . . .

SNELL, v. RENO HILTON RESORT,, 930 F. Supp. 1428 (D. Nev. 1996)

. . . litigation: (1) facsimile charges: $205.50; (2) long distance phone charges: $62.82; (3) photocopying: $686.60 . . .

ROBERTS v. HOMELITE DIVISION OF TEXTRON, INC., 117 F.R.D. 637 (N.D. Ind. 1987)

. . . So the total amount sought for process fees is $686.60. . . . Therefore, Homelite’s claim for private process server fees in the amount of $686.60 is allowed. . . .

ITT THOMPSON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 537 F. Supp. 1272 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1982)

. . . the status of sealed beam lamps imported separately; such lamps are specifically provided for in item 686.60 . . .

ITT v., 3 Ct. Int'l Trade 36 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1982)

. . . the status of sealed beam lamps imported separately; such lamps are specifically provided for in item 686.60 . . .

v., 65 Cust. Ct. 6 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . the status of sealed beam lamps imported separately; such lamps are specifically provided for m item 686.60 . . .