Cases from cite.case.law:

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. M. RICHARDS, 226 So. 3d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . created a separate Banking Statute of Frauds, as Florida did in 1989 with the enactment of section 687.0304 . . . Section 687.0304(2) provides that “[a] debtor may not maintain an action on a credit agreement unless . . . repayment of money ... to otherwise extend credit, or to make any other financial accommodation.” § 687.0304 . . . The statute creates order by imposing the requirement of a writing under section 687.0304(2) to memorialize . . . As we discussed above with section 687.0304, there was no full performance here that would remove the . . .

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, v. DELVAR a k a, 180 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . It appears that there are at least two Statutes of Frauds in effect in Florida: section 687.0304, Florida . . .

BLOCH, v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a a. k. a., 755 F.3d 886 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . attempt to add verbal conversations to the purported “promise,” such addition is barred by section 687.0304 . . . consideration, sets forth the relevant terms and conditions, and is signed by the creditor and the debtor. § 687.0304 . . .

SYNOVUS BANK, f. k. a. v. R. SIMS, III, LLC,, 540 F. App'x 905 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 687.0304(2). Hence, the district court properly dismissed the Defendants’ counterclaims. . . .

SWINTON, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 125 So. 3d 956 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 687.0304, Fla. Stat. (2012). GROSS, FORST, JJ., and ROSENBERG, ROBIN, Associate Judge, concur. . . .

CONGRESS PARK OFFICE CONDOS II, LLC, a v. FIRST- CITIZENS BANK TRUST COMPANY, a, 105 So. 3d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . an oral credit agreement as contemplated by Florida’s Banking Statute of Frauds, defined in section 687.0304 . . . See § 687.0304(l)(a), Fla. . . .

VARGAS, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., 104 So. 3d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 687.0304(2) of the Florida Statutes (2012) expressly provides that a “debtor may not maintain . . . repayment of money ..., to otherwise extend credit, or to make any other financial accommodation.” § 687.0304 . . . Florida’s banking statute of frauds because it is an agreement to make a financial accommodation. § 687.0304 . . . that a loan modification agreement is an agreement “to lend money and extend credit” under section 687.0304 . . . Beyond these statements, it does not appear that section 687.0304 was expressly mentioned or considered . . . grounds not relied on by the trial court or argued on appeal — that the statute of frauds, section 687.0304 . . .

AGATE v. E. CLAMPITT,, 80 So. 3d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Clampitt relies upon section 687.0304(2), Florida Statutes (1995), to support his Statute of Frauds defense . . . trial court’s final judgment is akin to a judgment on the pleadings and the trial court used section 687.0304 . . .

SILVER, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. d b a s LLC,, 760 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . § 687.0304(2). . . . Stat. § 687.0304(2). . . .

SUNDALE, LTD. v. OCEAN BANK,, 441 B.R. 384 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . Appellant seeks to alternatively argue that the Bankruptcy Court erred in finding that § 687.0304 applies . . . Stat. § 687.0304, Florida’s Banking Statute of Frauds, and was not pled with the requisite specificity . . . Stat. § 687.0304, Florida’s Banking Statute of Frauds, and was not pled with requisite specificity? . . . Stat. § 687.0304, Florida’s Bankruptcy Statute of Frauds, and was not pled with requisite specificity . . . Manifest Injustice Even if Appellant’s new claim that § 687.0304’s writing requirements do not apply . . .

CORAL REEF DRIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, F. J. v. DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 45 So. 3d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 687.0304, Florida Statutes (2007), requires that a borrower may not take legal action on “an . . . also legally insufficient under what has been called “Florida’s Banking Statute of Frauds,” section 687.0304 . . . attorneys, Coral Reefs principals could not ignore the requirements of those documents and section 687.0304 . . . estoppel cannot be employed where a promise is barred by the bank statute of frauds, which is section 687.0304 . . . , or things in action, to otherwise extent credit, or to make any other financial accommodation.” § 687.0304 . . .

DIXON, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., 710 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 687.0304. . . . Stat. § 687.0304(1). . . . extend credit and, therefore, is a credit agreement requiring the application of Florida Statute § 687.0304 . . . Yet, pursuant to Florida Statutes § 687.0304(2), a “debtor may not maintain an action on a credit agreement . . .

DIXON, v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,, 664 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Second Amended Complaint is barred by Florida’s banking statute of frauds, found in Florida Statute § 687.0304 . . . Stat. § 687.0304(1). . . . Yet, pursuant to Florida Statutes § 687.0304(2), a “debtor may not maintain an action on a credit agreement . . .

REESE, v. JPMORGAN CHASE CO. a d b a N. A. LLC, a LLC, a a, 686 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 687.0304. (Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss 7). . . . Stat. § 687.0304. . . .

BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, v. BASCIANO,, 960 So. 2d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . We need not concern ourselves with the application of the bank statute of frauds, section 687.0304, Florida . . .

METRO BUILDING MATERIALS CORP. v. REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI,, 919 So. 2d 595 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The trial court relied on section § 687.0304, Florida Statutes (1989), which is the statute of frauds . . . consideration, sets forth the relevant terms and conditions, and is signed by the debtor and creditor.” § 687.0304 . . . The Fifth District has said, “Section 687.0304 prevents a debtor from bringing a claim based on an oral . . . In pertinent part Section 687.0304 states: (2) CREDIT AGREEMENTS TO BE IN WRITING.. — A debtor may not . . .

PAVOLINI v. WILLIAMS,, 915 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Finally, while Section 687.0304(2), Florida Statutes (2005), provides that a debtor may not maintain . . . National Bank, 640 So.2d 1212, 1213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), for example, this court held that while section 687.0304 . . . such defenses arising subsequent to the entry of the agreement are outside the operation of section 687.0304 . . . P. 1.110(d), and are not barred by section 687.0304. . . .

DIAZ- VERSON, Jr. DVA LLC, a DVA LLC, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. A a, 159 F. App'x 71 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 687.0304. Diazr-Verson now appeals, contending that Counts I and II state claims for relief. . . . Fla Stat. § 687.0304(2). . . . Fla Stat. § 687.0304(l)(a). . . . Fla Stat. § 687.0304(3)(a). . . .

MARK ANDREW OF THE PALM BEACHES, LTD. v. GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 96 F. App'x 750 (2d Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 687.0304(1) & (2). . . .

THE MARK ANDREW OF THE PALM BEACHES, LTD. v. GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 265 F. Supp. 2d 366 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Stat § 687.0304(1). . . . Stat. § 687.0304(2). . . .

In B. VICKERS V. v. L. P., 275 B.R. 401 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Florida’s Banking Statute of Frauds, Section 687.0304(2), Florida Statutes, however, provides that: A . . . Citrus Nat’l Bank, 641 So.2d 458, 459 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) [referring to § 687.0304(2), Fla.Stat.]. . . . .

EBONI BEAUTY ACADEMY, v. AmSOUTH BANK OF FLORIDA,, 761 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Eboni’s complaint is barred by section 687.0304, Florida Statutes, which provides that a debtor may not . . . The judgment was apparently based on section 687.0304, but the statute does not apply to affirmative . . .

ATTANASIO v. EXCEL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a a, 757 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . as fraud in the inducement in order to avoid application of the banking statute of frauds, section 687.0304 . . .

UNIVERSITY CREEK ASSOCIATES II, LTD. a v. BOSTON AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. a f k a LLC, a, 100 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (S.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . . § 687.0304(2). . . .

HARRIS, a v. SCHICKEDANZ BROS. RIVIERA LTD. a a, 746 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . the grounds that there was a violation of the statute of frauds provisions in sections 671.206 and 687.0304 . . . The other statute cited by the trial court is section 687.0304, entitled Credit Agreements, which provides . . .

J SQUARE ENTERPRISES, v. E. REGNER, Jr., 734 So. 2d 565 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . The defendants moved to dismiss on the basis of section 687.0304, Florida Statutes (sometimes known as . . . As its first point on appeal, J Square argues that section 687.0304 does not bar enforcement of the agreement . . . While we agree that the fraud claims are not barred by section 687.0304 (since its applicability has . . .

CONSOLIDATED SERVICES, INC. v. KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOC., 29 F. Supp. 2d 942 (N.D. Ind. 1998)

. . . . § 687.0304 (West 1990) (approved 1989); Ga. . . .

PUFF N STUFF OF WINTER PARK, INC. v. T. BELL, W., 683 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because section 687.0304(2), Florida Statutes, is not . . . The impetus for enacting section 687.0304(2) was explained in Brenow-itz v. . . . By its express terms, section 687.0304(2) does not preclude an action for acts of fraud on the part of . . . The legislative history to House Bill 878, which became section 687.0304(1), expressly provides that . . . Gewitz, Impact of Florida Statute § 687.0304 on Lender Liability Actions, LXVI, 6 Fla. . . . We hold that the trial judge was correct in applying section 687.0304(2), Florida Statutes (1989) in . . . HARRIS, Judge, concurring specially: I concur with Judge Cobb’s opinion, which is based on section 687.0304 . . . But the rub, of course, is section 687.0304(2), which requires that before a loan commitment can be enforced . . .

J. COLLINS, v. CITRUS NATIONAL BANK,, 641 So. 2d 458 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . .” § 687.0304, Florida Statutes. . . . Judge Peterson that the combination of writings in this case can satisfy the requirements of section 687.0304 . . . contract was the theory pleaded in the original complaint which was dismissed on the basis of section 687.0304 . . . Section 687.0304 “restricts the ability of the borrower to bring suit upon oral credit agreements.... . . . original complaint, an agreement between the parties and a writing that meets the requirements of section 687.0304 . . .

L. MAYNARD, v. CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK,, 640 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . CNB relied on the authority of section 687.0304, Florida Statutes (1991) which provides in pertinent . . . The trial court granted CNB’s motion based upon section 687.0304, Florida Statutes. . . . Section 687.0304 prevents a debtor from bringing a claim based on an oral credit agreement but does not . . . The bank argued that Brenowitz’ affirmative defenses were barred by section 687.0304, Florida Statutes . . . may be asserted pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(d) and are not barred by section 687.0304 . . . Brenowitz as a debtor and, accordingly, the defenses were not subject to the limitations of section 687.0304 . . . of summary judgment against the Griffithses on their counterclaim, agreeing that pursuant to section 687.0304 . . . defenses in their current form, nor are they susceptible to amendment to avoid the prohibition of section 687.0304 . . .

DURHAM, INC. C. v. VANGUARD BANK TRUST COMPANY, 858 F. Supp. 617 (E.D. La. 1994)

. . . . § 687.0304. . § 1121. . . .

G. BROCKLEBANK, v. EASTERN FINANCIAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,, 634 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 687.0304, Fla.Stat. (1991); Griffiths v. . . . Barnett Bank of Naples, 603 So.2d 690, 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (The court, in construing Section 687.0304 . . .

T. CHASE, v. ESPIRITO SANTO BANK OF FLORIDA,, 625 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Bloom, 386 So.2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); § 687.0304, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

SUNFLOWER BAZAAR, INC. v. FLORIDA FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK,, 610 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Banco Indus. de Venezuela, C.A., 534 So.2d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA1988); § 687.0304, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

A. GRIFFITHS v. BARNETT BANK OF NAPLES, a, 603 So. 2d 690 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Barnett contends that section 687.0304, Florida Statutes (1989), bars any action because there was no . . . affirmative defenses of subsequent waiver, estoppel and bad faith are outside the operation of section 687.0304 . . . These alleged actions are specifically excluded as specified in subsection (3) of section 687.0304. . . .

R. RIVERS, v. SOUTHEAST BANK LEASING COMPANY,, 603 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Leaving entirely aside the applicability of section 687.0304, Florida Statutes (1989), we conclude that . . .

VANS R US, INC. a J. a v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA,, 597 So. 2d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Melo, 366 So.2d 1218, 1221 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); § 687.0304, Fla.Stat. (1991). Affirmed. . . .

P. BRENOWITZ, H. L. v. CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK,, 597 So. 2d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . in any event because Brenowitz’s affirmative defenses were rendered legally inoperative by section 687.0304 . . . , Florida Statutes (1989), which states the following: 687.0304 Credit agreements.— (1) DEFINITIONS — . . .

BOB YOUNG, INC. v. SOUTHEAST BANK, N. A., 583 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Pan American Bank of Hialeah, 383 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Section 687.0304, Florida Statutes (1989 . . .