Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 687.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 687.09 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 687.09

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 687
INTEREST AND USURY; LENDING PRACTICES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 687.09
687.09 Persons accepting chattel mortgage as security for loans under $100 to cause amount as principal, interest, and fees to be inserted.Every mortgagee accepting a mortgage on personal property as security for the repayment of a loan of money less than $100 shall cause to be stated in such mortgage, separately and distinctly, the several amounts secured as principal, interest and fees, and any mortgagee willfully violating the provisions of this section shall forfeit all interest and fees secured by such mortgage, and be entitled to recover only the principal sum.
History.s. 7, ch. 5960, 1909; RGS 4857; CGL 6944.

F.S. 687.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 687.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 687.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 687.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 687.09.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. C. BURKE,, 517 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1988)

. . . This amounts to $687.09. . . .

FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF VERO BEACH, a v. W. STELLMON I., 170 So. 2d 302 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . statutory revisions, and now appears as Sections 687.02, 687.03, 687.04, 687.06, 687.07, 687.08 and 687.09 . . .

v., 42 T.C. 660 (T.C. 1964)

. . . Exhibit 4~D) indicates this was a joint account of “Rhoda Kreps or Sidney Kreps (husband)” and that $687.09 . . .

WHITE v. NEW YORK STATE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION, 191 F. Supp. 38 (W.D. Pa. 1958)

. . . substantially reduced and that from December, 1955, when plaintiff received a monthly payment in the sum of $687.09 . . .