Cases from cite.case.law:

PUGH, v. STATE, 181 So. 3d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . probationary sentence on seven felony counts of unlawful acceptance of advance fees in violation of section 687.141 . . .

G. MOGAVERO, Jr. v. STATE, 744 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See §§ 494.0018, 494.0025(3), 687.141(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . We affirm the two convictions under section 687.141(1) and the revocation of probation. . . . The two convictions under section 687.141(1) were sufficient to support a revocation of probation. . . .

CREDICORP, INCORPORATED, a W. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE,, 659 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . must either pay the unconstitutional 520.32(1) license tax, or, pursuant to the prohibition of section 687.141 . . . See § 687.141(1), Fla.Stat. . . . installment contractors found in section 520.32, Florida Statutes, and the loan broker provisions in section 687.141 . . . is not a loan broker as defined in section 687.14(4), it did not violate the provisions of section 687.141 . . . The Department alleged Credieorp was a “loan broker” under chapter 687 and was violating section 687.141 . . . Loan Broker Act A We affirm the Department’s ruling that appellants violated provisions of sections 687.141 . . . Section 687.141 provides: No loan broker shall: (1) Assess or collect an advance fee from a borrower . . .