The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 713.02(7), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .
. . . See §§ 713.02(3), 713.05, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . See § 713.02(3)-(4), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .
. . . . § 713.02(6), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). . . . Section 713.02(6), Florida Statutes (1999), provided that an owner could avoid construction liens on . . .
. . . contractor’s] lien, the court must look first to the enforceability of the basic contractual obligation); § 713.02 . . .
. . . Section 713.02(4), reads: (4) Persons who are not in privity with an owner and who perform labor ... . . .
. . . The homeowner argues that the completion contract was exempt by reason of subsection 713.02(5), Florida . . . excess of $2,500, so it follows that compliance with subsection 713.07(4) was required and subsection 713.02 . . .
. . . See § 713.02(4), Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .
. . . The court grounded its summary judgment upon apphcation of section 713.02(7), Florida Statutes (1995) . . . the record, however, we find that genuine issues of material fact exist concerning whether section 713.02 . . . factual matters associated with the determination of Architectural’s status within the meaning of section 713.02 . . .
. . . Section 713.02(5) provides (5) Any improvement for which the direct contract price is $2,500 or less . . . although he has a direct contract and is in privity with the owners, but he asserts that because section 713.02 . . . Section 713.02(5) provides that when the direct contract price is $2,500 or less, the improvement is . . .
. . . Section 713.02(6), Florida Statutes (1985). . . .
. . . See MPEP § 713.02 (“Prior to filing, no interview is permitted. . . . The prefiling meeting thus violated three separate provisions of the MPEP: § 713.02 (interviews prior . . .
. . . under Chapter 713 to enforce a claim for architectural fees would be through the mechanism of section 713.02 . . .
. . . See Sec. 713.02(6), Fla.Stat. . . .
. . . While the text of section 713.04 does not specifically refer to subdivision improvements, section 713.02 . . .
. . . affidavit was required of it because it had furnished owner with a payment bond pursuant to section 713.02 . . .
. . . Section 713.02(5), Florida Statutes (1983), provides that “[a]ny improvement for which the contract price . . . This is because § 713.02(5) (1977) provided an exemption where an improvement was made to an existing . . . In 1978, the Florida legislature amended the exemption contained in § 713.-02(5). § 713.02(5) eliminated . . . Presently, any improvement within the monetary limits of § 713.02(5) is exempt from liens of non-privity . . . Because Section 713.02(5), Florida Statutes (1983) unambiguously exempts appellants’ property from Rinker . . .
. . . United had no claim against Goldberger because Safeco had posted a payment bond pursuant to Sections 713.02 . . .
. . . Sections 713.02(6) and 713.23 of part I, relating to payment bonds, however, remove from part I owners . . .
. . . . § 713.02(6), Fla. Stat. (1979). . . .
. . . See §§ 713.02(6) and 713.23, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .
. . . When Section 713.23 is read in conjunction with Section 713.02(6), it provides for a payment bond for . . .
. . . The Trustee further observes that Florida Statutes section 713.02 sets forth various types of lienors . . .
. . . 713.23, Florida Statutes (1975), which exempted them from liability to subcontractor under Section 713.02 . . .
. . . Chapter 713.02 Fla. . . .
. . . . § 713.02(6); 22 Fla.Jur., Mechanics Liens, § 54 (1977 Supp.). . . .
. . . Sections 713.02(6), 713.23. . . . Section 713.02(6) provides: “In any direct contract the owner may require the contractor to furnish a . . . December 5, 1975, dismissed the suppliers’ foreclosure action against the owner because of the Section 713.02 . . .
. . . emphasis supplied) Although the subject bond is entitled “Statutory Payment Bond Pursuant to Sections 713.02 . . .
. . . Section 84.022(4), F.S.1963, now § 713.02 (4), F.S.1975. . . . .
. . . . § 713.02(6), F.S.A. reading as follows: “In any direct contract the owner may require the contractor . . . Appellee argues that the provision in F.S. § 713.02(6) F.S.A., that the “owner may post said bond or . . .
. . . Section 713.02, headed “Types of lienors and exemptions”, provides that in any direct contract the owner . . .
. . . Section 713.02(4), F.S.A.1967. . Now F.S. Section 713.01(6), F.S.A.1967. .Nathman v. . . .