Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 721.21 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 721.21 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 721.21

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 721
VACATION AND TIMESHARE PLANS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 721.21
721.21 Purchasers’ remedies.An action for damages or for injunctive or declaratory relief for a violation of this chapter may be brought by any purchaser or owners’ association against the developer, a seller, an escrow agent, or the managing entity. The prevailing party in any such action, or in any action in which the purchaser claims a right of voidability based upon either a closing before the expiration of the cancellation period or an amendment which materially alters or modifies the offering in a manner adverse to the purchaser, may be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Relief under this section does not exclude other remedies provided by law.
History.s. 1, ch. 81-172; s. 20, ch. 83-264; s. 29, ch. 2000-302.

F.S. 721.21 on Google Scholar

F.S. 721.21 on Casetext

Amendments to 721.21


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 721.21
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 721.21.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BELL v. R. D. I. RESORT SERVICES CORPORATION,, 637 So. 2d 960 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . presumed to be a part of the transfer and shall be deemed to be included in the instrument of transfer _ 721.21 . . .

P. SHAKESHOBER, v. FLORIDA RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORP. a, 492 So. 2d 816 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Appellant also claims attorney’s fees pursuant to section 721.21, Florida Statutes. . . .

JAMES G. McCONKEY AND CLAUDINE W. McCONKEY v. THE UNITED STATES, 131 Ct. Cl. 690 (Ct. Cl. 1955)

. . . . $50, 721.21 28. . . .

BAXTER v. CARD, 59 F. 165 (E.D.S.C. 1893)

. . . This item should be allowed, — $721.21. . . .