Cases from cite.case.law:

MULVEY, v. STEPHENS, J., 250 So. 3d 106 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . and substantive, between wills and trusts, for the reasoning of DeWitt , and the purpose of section 733.103 . . .

WOLF, v. Jo DOLL, T., 229 So. 3d 1280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Generally, collateral proceedings to a probate action are governed by section 733.103(2), Florida Statutes . . .

G. MARCELLUS v. VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS B. a a B. a, 849 F.3d 169 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 733.103. . . . political office in elections for local office in the municipality or political subdivision.” 5 C.F.R. § 733.103 . . .

LEWIS, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,, 594 F. App'x 974 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 733.103(b)(1)). This limited exception, however, was inapplicable to Mr. . . .

KOWALSKI, a v. JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. P., 981 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (S.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 733.103 which provides that “[u]ntil admitted to probate in this state or in a state where the decedent . . . Stat. § 733.103(1). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 50 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 733.103, Fla. Stat. Effect of probate. § 733.201, Fla. Stat. Proof of wills. § 733.202, Fla. . . .

A. SCHILLING, v. HERRERA,, 952 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 733.103(2), Florida Statutes (1977), provides as follows:. . . . Because they lacked assiduity in failing to avail themselves of this remedy, we interpret section 733.103 . . . The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding that pursuant to section 733.103, . . . , the action “falls into the category of cases that DeWitt considers outside the purview of Section 733.103 . . .

RICE, v. GREENE, Sr., 941 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Rice points to section 733.103(1), Florida Statutes (2004). . . . Section 733.103(1) provides that “[ujntil admitted to probate in this state or in the state where the . . . Rice is correct that under section 733.103, Mr. . . .

K. MILLER, v. HAYMAN, J., 766 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . If she did not succeed in revoking the will, the interference claim would be barred by section 733.103 . . .

ALL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL, INC. St. St. s v. H. OWENS,, 754 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . The public policy of finality concerning devised property contained in section 733.103(2), Florida Statutes . . . Charities’ theory, it would substantially impact upon the public policy of finality advanced by section 733.103 . . . Section 733.103(2), Florida Statutes (1993) provides: In any collateral action or proceeding relating . . .

MARTIN v. MARTIN,, 687 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . The probate statute involved in DeWitt, section 733.103(2), Fla. . . . In concluding that the trial court was correct, the supreme court characterized section 733.103(2) as . . . and substantive, between wills and trusts, for the reasoning of DeWitt, and the purpose of section 733.103 . . .

R. CAVANAUGH, M. v. R. CAVANAUGH,, 542 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . In that case, not involving homestead, the supreme court held that section 733.103, Florida Statutes, . . .

EBELING, f k a f k a v. G. VOLTZ, 454 So. 2d 783 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Whether Section 733.103(2), Florida Statutes is an unconstitutional infringement on the Supreme Court . . . I There has been little case law illuminating Section 733.103(2), Florida Statutes (1983), so we must . . . That court certified the question of whether such a suit was barred by Section 733.103(2) to the Florida . . . Section 733.103(2), Florida Statutes, both in 1977 and presently, provides that the probate of a Florida . . . case therefore falls into the category of cases that DeWitt considers outside the purview of Section 733.103 . . .

G. DeWITT M. v. R. DUCE,, 675 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . grievance, with a fair opportunity to pursue it, the Florida Court held they were barred by section 733.103 . . . Fla.Stat. § 733.103(2) provides: In any collateral action or proceeding relating to devised property, . . .

G. DeWITT M. v. R. DUCE, W. E., 408 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1981)

. . . through the federal courts, the district court on remand dismissed the cause on the ground that section 733.103 . . . Because section 733.103(2) is little more than the codification of the common-law rule against collateral . . . Because they lacked assiduity in failing to avail themselves of this remedy, we interpret section 733.103 . . .

G. DeWITT M. v. R. DUCE, 642 F.2d 159 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 733.103(2) (West Supp.1981) forecloses plaintiffs from proving the facts necessary to prevail on . . .