The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Interestingly, section 770.05, which addresses limitation of choice of venue, does specifically include . . .
. . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05 . . . Stat. §§ 770.05, 770.07. . . .
. . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05 . . .
. . . The firm asks the Court to award $391.94 for database access, $4,764.85 for depositions, $770.05 for . . .
. . . Id., § 770.05(5). . . .
. . . . § 770.05 (“No person shall have more than one choice of venue for damages for libel or slander, invasion . . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s.770.05 . . .
. . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in s. 770.05 . . . Stat, § 770.05 (defines actions subject to single publication rule as “libel or slander, invasion of . . .
. . . May 4 when she spent $794.64, April 29 when her purchases totaled $940.21, April 27 when she charged $770.05 . . .
. . . See § 770.05, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
. . . Arguably, the $770.05 set off by the IRS relating to the period ending December 31, 1993, is for a period . . .
. . . . § 770.05, which defines a single publication to include “any one edition of a newspaper, book or magazine . . .
. . . In Per-due, supra, this statute was construed in pari materia with Section 770.05, which addresses the . . .
. . . Plaintiff contended that the merchandise was properly classifiable under item 770.05, TSUS, as “articles . . . properly classified as “articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics ... other,” under item 770.05 . . .
. . . Plaintiff contended that the merchandise was properly classifiable under item 770.05, TSUS, as “articles . . . classified as “articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics * * * other,” under item 770.05 . . .
. . . protests this classification and contends that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 770.05 . . . not specially provided for wholly or almost wholly of reinforced or laminated plastics: Laminated: 770.05 . . . that the merchandise was incorrectly classified by customs, and is properly classifiable under item 770.05 . . . properly classified as “articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics ... other,” under item 770.05 . . .
. . . protests this classification and contends that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 770.05 . . . that the merchandise was incorrectly classified by customs, and is properly classifiable under item 770.05 . . . classified as “articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics * * * other,” under item 770.05 . . .
. . . . §§ 770.05, 770.08, Florida Statutes (1979), Perdue v. . . .
. . . . §§ 770.05-770.08, F.S.A., and held that venue of the instant action properly lay only in Dade County . . . Legislature responded to the above decision by enacting Chapter 67-52 which in pertinent part became F.S. § 770.05 . . . distribution or circulation. . ” (emphasis added) Thus, when we read our “single publication” act (§ 770.05 . . . course, as earlier outlined, only one of these available venues may be chosen in accordance with F.S. § 770.05 . . . action for damages founded upon a single publication or exhibition or utterance, as described in § 770.05 . . . of 1966, the Florida Legislature sought to reverse the effect of that decision by enacting Section 770.05 . . .
. . . News-Journal Corporation, 196 So.2d 97 (1966), rehearing denied, February 8, 1967, the legislature enacted §§770.05 . . .