The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLV
TORTS

Chapter 772
CIVIL REMEDIES FOR CRIMINAL PRACTICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 772.101

772.101 Short title.—This chapter shall be known as the “Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act.”

History.—s. 3, ch. 86-277.

F.S. 772.101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 772.101 on Casetext

Amendments to 772.101

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 772.101

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 772.101.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. v. QUALITY DIAGNOSTIC HEALTH CARE, INC., 369 F. Supp. 3d 1292 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . . §§ 772.101 - 772.19, against Jorge, Acebo, Dr. Queral, Dr. . . .

NOLDEN, v. SUMMIT FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a USA, a d b a, 244 So. 3d 322 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 772.101, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

ABSOLUTE ACTIVIST VALUE MASTER FUND LIMITED, v. DEVINE,, 233 F. Supp. 3d 1297 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 772.101. . . . .

HANSAWORLD USA, INCORPORATED, a v. G. CARPENTER,, 662 F. App'x 259 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 772.101 (“Florida RICO”) against Defendant-Appellee Damon Carpenter (“Carpenter”). . . .

BURGESE v. STARWOOD HOTELS RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC., 101 F. Supp. 3d 414 (D.N.J. 2015)

. . . . § 772.101 et seq., Florida’s equivalent of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations . . .

C. COURBOIN, v. SCOTT, LLC, LLC,, 596 F. App'x 729 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 772.101, the analysis of personal jurisdiction for such claims would also be addressed under the . . .

ARTHUR, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA,, 569 F. App'x 669 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § § 772.101-772.19 (hereinafter, the “Florida RICO Act”). . . .

In BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, a a v. H. L. LLC,, 740 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 772.101 et seq. . . .

In BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, a a v. H. L. LLC,, 740 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 772.101 et seq. . . .

HORACE- MANASSE, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. N. A., 521 F. App'x 782 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 772.101, and for conspiracy to violate the Florida RICO Act. . . .

SILVER, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. d b a s LLC,, 760 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . . §§ 772.101 et seq. Silver failed to file a Civil RICO Case Statement pursuant to S.D. Fla. . . .

LENNAR CORPORATION, v. BRIARWOOD CAPITAL LLC,, 430 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . . § 772.101, et seq., implicate federal law issues sufficient to establish federal question jurisdiction . . . Stat. § 772.101, et seq. . . .

L. OGLESBEE, v. INDYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. LLC, MERS, 675 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . fraudulent misrepresentations constitute a pattern of criminal activity in violation of Florida Statute § 772.101 . . .

ACOSTA, v. D. CAMPBELL, J. P. A. FSB, W. M., 309 F. App'x 315 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 772.101 et seq.; the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.; Florida . . .

BRAY GILLESPIE MANAGEMENT LLC, I, L. P. X, LLC, v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, USA, 527 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Florida’s Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, codified as Florida Statues, Section 772.101 et . . .

FLORIDA EVERGREEN FOLIAGE v. E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a, 336 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . This Act, Florida Statutes § 772.101 et seq., is patterned after the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt . . .

In BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE, INC. TIRES PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. II, v. a a a M. J. v. a Co. a a a, 203 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (S.D. Ind. 2002)

. . . . § 772.101, et seq. (hereinafter “state civil RICO”). . . .

INNOVATIVE MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. v. W. REITZ H., 793 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Durland, and others, and was based on Florida’s Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, sections 772.101 . . .

D. PIERCE, Jr. v. RITTER, CHUSID, BIVONIA COHEN, 133 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (S.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . . §§ 772.101-772.104, the party filing the claim shall serve a RICO Case Statement. . . .

AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GOLD COAST MARINE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., 771 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . civil RICO violation (Count II), a pattern of racketeering activity and damages pursuant to sections 772.101 . . .

CHANDRA, M. D. v. J. BRADSTREET, M. D., 727 So. 2d 372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . are James Bradstreet, M.D., Morgan Bunch, III, M.D., Lori Nelson, D.D.S., and Peter Taraschi, D.O. . 772.101 . . .

A. WONG KEN, R. v. STATE FARM FIRE CASUALTY COMPANY,, 685 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . permitting, instead of total rescission, claims by the carrier for treble damages for theft, see §§ 772.101 . . .

SEAMAN, v. ARVIDA REALTY SALES, INC. a, 910 F. Supp. 581 (M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Sec. 772.101 Florida’ Civil Anti-Theft statute Defendant argues that Seaman’s breach of contract action . . .

DOMINICAN ENERGY LIMITED, INC. a v. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, a, 903 F. Supp. 1507 (M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . . §§ 1961-64 (the federal RICO statute) and Florida Statutes Chps. 772.101-104 (the Florida RICO statute . . .

WATER INTERNATIONAL NETWORK, U. S. A. INC. v. A. EAST, D. a a, 892 F. Supp. 1477 (M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Count III: Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act Pursuant to Florida Statute Chapter 772.101 . . .

BOARD OF REGENTS OF STATE OF FLORIDA, By UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, v. TABORSKY,, 648 So. 2d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . This is an action under the Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, Sections 772.101, et seq., FlaStats . . .

S. BALDREE, v. CARGILL, INC. UNITED STATES v. CARGILL, INC. d b a, 758 F. Supp. 704 (M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 772.101 et seq. . . . Car-gill’s pattern of racketeering activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., and Fla.Stat. §§ 772.101 . . .

PEELE v. UNITED STATES, 3 Cl. Ct. 419 (Cl. Ct. 1983)

. . . . §§ 772.101 et seq. (1978). . . .

BUSH v. LUCAS, 462 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1983)

. . . right to appeal to the Civil Service Commission’s Federal Employee Appeals Authority. 5 CFR §§752.203, 772.101 . . .

W. McLEAN, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,, 544 F. Supp. 821 (W.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . . §§ 752.203 and 772.101 (1978). . . . . § 772.101 (1978). The FEAA and the Civil Service Commission no longer exist. . . .

M. EDWARDS v. CROSBY, 540 F. Supp. 60 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . . §§ 772.101-.312 (1976) (former regulations governing adverse-action appeals of agency adverse actions . . . See 5 C.F.R. §§ 772.101-312 (1976). . . .

W. ATWELL, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, M. DALLA, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, K. CALDWELL, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION D. ALLEN, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION F. CARTER v. F. LEHMAN, Jr., 670 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1981)

. . . . §§ 772.101-.404 (1978). . . .

C. FUCIK v. UNITED STATES, 655 F.2d 1089 (Ct. Cl. 1981)

. . . . §§ 772.101-772.312 (1977). . . .

WILLIAM C. FUCIK v. THE UNITED STATES, 228 Ct. Cl. 379 (Ct. Cl. 1981)

. . . . §§ 772.101-772.312 (1977). . . .

A. LIGUORI, v. ALEXANDER, Lt. J., 495 F. Supp. 641 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . Part 752 § 772.101, § 772.301 (1978) [All references in this opinion to the C.F.R. are to the 1978 edition . . .

A. WARD v. K. CAMPBELL,, 610 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . . §§ 772.101, 772.307(b) (1978). . . .

H. BIDDLE, Jr. v. UNITED STATES ACTION, 602 F.2d 441 (D.C. Cir. 1979)

. . . . §§ 351.901, 772.101, 772.301(a) (1978), and to hear all appeals concerning “adverse actions,” see 5 . . . C.F.R. §§ 752.203(a), 772.101, 772.301(a) (1978). . . .

L. NOLAND, v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, 544 F.2d 333 (8th Cir. 1976)

. . . . §§ 772.101, et seq., filed an order denying petitioner’s claim concerning a reduction in force action . . .