Cases from cite.case.law:

R. C. O. a v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 844 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . ." § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (2018) ; Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim) 10.5. . . .

DOOLEY, v. STATE, 268 So. 3d 880 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . 775.087(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), one count of improper exhibition of a firearm pursuant to section 790.10 . . . Section 790.10 defines improper exhibition of a firearm as follows: "If any person having or carrying . . .

SEBASTIAN, v. ORTIZ,, 918 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 790.10. . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 253 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2018)

. . . amended in 1989, and 2013 [131 So.3d 720], and 2018. 10.5 IMPROPER EXHIBITION OF A [WEAPON] [FIREARM] § 790.10 . . . Lesser Included Offenses IMPROPER EXHIBITION OF A WEAPON OR FIREARM - 790.10 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO . . .

PIETRZYCKI, v. HEIGHTS TOWER SERVICE, INC., 290 F. Supp. 3d 822 (N.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . . § 790.10. . . . See 29 C.F.R. § 790.10(e) (" 'The custom or practice' by which compensability of an activity is tested . . . See 29 C.F.R. § 790.10(e) (" 'The custom or practice' by which compensability of an activity is tested . . .

E. CARUTHERS, v. STATE, 235 So. 3d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . (Crim.) 10.5; see also § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . See §§ 784.011, 790.10, Fla. Stat. . . .

G. R. N. a v. STATE, 220 So. 3d 1267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (2016) (emphasis added). . . . When a knife is the weapon involved in a section 790.10 charge, it is necessary for the state to establish . . .

NORMAN, v. STATE, 215 So. 3d 18 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Representative Johnson contended that because section 790.10 made it unlawful for an individual to “exhibit . . .

LAMBERT, v. STATE, 200 So. 3d 1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . two counts of the lesser included offense of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon under section 790.10 . . . Lambert is correct that his two convictions and sentences under section 790.10 for what was clearly a . . . We approve the interpretation of section 790.10 ... that pre-eludes multiple convictions for a single . . . a pickup truck could only support a single conviction of that offense under the language of section 790.10 . . . among three individuals in a driveway somehow constituted separate criminal incidents under section 790.10 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 195 So. 3d 356 (Fla. 2016)

. . . is presently unclear whether a defendant who improperly exhibits an antique firearm violates section 790.10 . . . angry, or threatening manner; and (3) does the foregoing in the presence of one or more persons. § 790.10 . . . proposed comment is thus inconsistent with how the term “firearm” is defined within the context of section 790.10 . . . and amended in 2013 [131 So.3d 7551, and 2016. • 10.5 IMPROPER EXHIBITION OF A [WEAPON] [FIREARM] § 790.10 . . .

FOREHAND, v. STATE, 175 So. 3d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Statutes (2013); on Count 2 of improper exhibition of a firearm, a first-degree misdemeanor; see section 790.10 . . .

BRAND, v. COMCAST CORPORATION LLC,, 135 F. Supp. 3d 713 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . . § 790.10(c). . . .

ALMONT AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER, LLC, v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., 99 F. Supp. 3d 1110 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . California Insurance Code Section 790.10 and 10 C.C.R. . . . by the California DOI require affirmative disclosure of such provisions pursuant to Ins.Code section 790.10 . . .

COLLIER, v. STATE Of, 159 So. 3d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Collier requested an instruction on improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon pursuant to section 790.10 . . . The definition of “weapon” for purposes of section 790.10 is located in section 790.001(13). . . . Thus, for a chair to be a “weapon” under section 790.10, it must be an “other deadly weapon.” . . . weapon” under that section to be an “other weapon” for purposes of improper exhibition under section 790.10 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT NO., 148 So. 3d 1204 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Improper Exhibition of a Weapon or Firearm (except if the weapon is a closed common pocketknife) 790.10 . . .

WATSON, v. STATE, 133 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . lesser-included offense of improper exhibition of a firearm on that count, in violation of section 790.10 . . .

MICKLOS, v. STATE, 137 So. 3d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .

COLELLA, P. Jr. K. J. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 986 F. Supp. 2d 320 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . . § 790.10(f). . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013)

. . . adopted in 1981 and was amended in 1989 and 2013. 10.5 IMPROPER EXHIBITION OF A [WEAPON][FIREARM] § 790.10 . . . Lesser Included Offenses IMPROPER EXHIBITION OF A WEAPON OR FIREARM — 790.10 CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 755 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Stat. 784.021 (lYa) is charged 790.10 10.5 Assault 784.011 8.1 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Improper Exhibition . . . Stalking 784.048(2) 8.6 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Assault 784.011 8.1 Improper exhibition of dangerous weapon 790.10 . . . Stat. 784.02im(a] is charged 790.10 10.5 Assault 784.011 8.1 Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 improper-exhibition . . .

PIERRE, v. CITY OF MIRAMAR, FLORIDA, INC. a Al, 537 F. App'x 821 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 790.10, and Open Carrying of Weapon, Fla. Stat. § 790.053. . . .

CHRIST, v. STATE, 104 So. 3d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Under section 790.10, Florida Statutes (2009), improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon occurs when . . . See § 790.10. . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 101 So. 3d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes (2012), prohibits the exhibition of a firearm or other weapon “in the . . .

M. J. a v. STATE, 100 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . meet its burden of proving that the BB gun he wielded was a “weapon” within the meaning of section 790.10 . . . Section 790.10 provides: If any person having or carrying any dirk, sword, sword cane, firearm, electric . . .

R. THOMPSON, A. v. HALL, A. D., 479 F. App'x 243 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 790.10. . . . Section 790.10 provides that "[i]f any person having or carrying any ... firearm ... shall, in the presence . . . Id. § 790.10. . In Bonner v. . . .

MARTINEZ, v. STATE, 69 So. 3d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Martinez appeals from his conviction and sentence for improper exhibition of weapon pursuant to section 790.10 . . . Whether the self-defense clause of section 790.10, Fla. . . .

ROBERTS, v. STATE, 47 So. 3d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes (2007), prohibits the exhibition of a firearm “in the presence of one . . .

MICHAUD, v. STATE, 47 So. 3d 374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes (2008), defines this offense as follows: If any person having or carrying . . .

REGALADO, v. STATE, 25 So. 3d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 790.10, Fla. Stat. . . . That is a crime only if it is done in a "rude, careless, angry, or threatening manner.” § 790.10, Fla . . . See also § 790.10, Fla. Stat. . . .

ANDRE, v. STATE, 13 So. 3d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .1985) (holding that the second conviction was “totally unsupported by the evidence” because section 790.10 . . .

MAULDIN, v. STATE, 9 So. 3d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (2002) (emphasis added). . . .

KONRATH, Jr. v. STATE, 997 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 790.10, Fla. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 994 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 2008)

. . . 784.07(2)(a) 8.10 foreement officer_ Assault_784.011_8.1 _Attempt_777.04(1) 5.1 Improper exhibition of 790.10 . . . enforcement 784.07(2)(b) 8.11 officer_ Battery_784.03_8J5_ _Attempt_777.04(1) 5.1 Improper exhibition of 790.10 . . .

J. R. a v. STATE, 967 So. 2d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . before trial to charge appellant with improperly exhibiting a dangerous weapon pursuant to section 790.10 . . . session at the judge’s behest to uncover cases interpreting the term “dangerous weapon” in section 790.10 . . . bore the burden at trial of presenting competent, substantial evidence that appellant violated section 790.10 . . . .. in the presence of one or more persons ... in a rude, careless, angry, or threatening manner.” § 790.10 . . . See § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (2006). For this reason, appellant was entitled to judgment of acquittal. . . .

Jo l JOHNSON, v. RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS,, 554 F. Supp. 2d 693 (E.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . § 790.10(c); accord United Paperworkers Int’l Union, Local No. 30192 v. . . .

WHITAKER, v. STATE, 952 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes, prohibits improper exhibition of dangerous weapons or firearms, and . . . provides: 790.10. . . . guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. § 790.10 . . .

In NATIONAL WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE DEFERRED ANNUITIES LITIGATION, 467 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (S.D. Cal. 2006)

. . . Finally, Defendant asks the court to strike references in the CAC to California Insurance Code §§ 785-790.10 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. R. BEAN, U. S., 62 M.J. 264 (C.A.A.F. 2005)

. . . . § 790.10, assimilated into federal law by 18 U.S.C. § 13 (2000), read in relevant part as follows: . . . 790.10. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 892 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . convicted on each of the lesser-included offense of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon under section 790.10 . . . Relying on TroedeVs fundamental error pronouncement, we held that because section 790.10 was only violated . . .

D. ALLEN, v. STATE, 876 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . arrested on charges of (1) improper exhibition of a firearm or dangerous weapon, pursuant to section 790.10 . . .

PHILLIPS, v. STATE, 874 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . category 2 permissive lesser-included offense of improper exhibition of a deadly weapon, see sections 790.10 . . . in a rude, careless, angry or threatening manner,” an essential element of the offense under section 790.10 . . .

F. B. a v. STATE, 852 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 2003)

. . . convicted on each of the lesser-included offense of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon under section 790.10 . . . Relying on Troedel’s fundamental error pronouncement, we held that because section 790.10 was only violated . . .

M. A. A. a v. STATE, 834 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . judgment of guilt for the lesser included offense of improper exhibition of a weapon under section 790.10 . . .

CARDONA, v. STATE, 835 So. 2d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 787.02(2); § 790.10; and § 800.03, Fla. Stat. (2001). . Williams v. . . .

A. J. A v. STATE, 826 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

RUSSO, v. STATE, 814 So. 2d 463 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla. Stat. Thus, waiving a gun at two people, in one motion, would be only one crime. . . .

WAGGONER, v. STATE, 800 So. 2d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla. Slat. . . .

TURNER, v. STATE, 771 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla, Stat. (1999); I.T. v. State, 694 So.2d 720, 724 (Fla.1997). . . .

B. ROUNDS, v. STATE, 769 So. 2d 424 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

BASS, Jr. v. STATE, 739 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes (1997) provides: If any person having or carrying any dirk, sword, sword . . . DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ„ concur. . § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1997). . § 784.021(l)(a), Fla. . . .

R. CARDER, v. STATE, 731 So. 2d 784 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla. Slat. . 322.34, Fla. Stat. . . .

D. S. a v. STATE, 730 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur. . § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . .

FARLEY, v. STATE, 740 So. 2d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . .” § 790.10, Florida Statutes. . . .

SALYERS, v. STATE, 705 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . A jury found Salyers guilty of improper exhibition of a weapon, in violation of § 790.10, Florida Statutes . . .

GREEN, v. STATE, 706 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes (1995) provides as follows: If any person having or carrying any ... . . .

LEGETTE, v. STATE, 694 So. 2d 826 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

HALL, v. STATE, 675 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1993). . § 843.02, Fla. Stat. (1993). . . .

D. BELL, v. STATE, 670 So. 2d 123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes (1993), provides: If any person having or carrying any dirk, sword, . . .

CANION, v. STATE, 661 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . counts of the lesser included offense of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon pursuant' to section 790.10 . . .

STATE DUNWOODY,, 768 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Upon the State’s proper confession of error based upon section 790.10, Florida Statutes (1993); Vance . . .

MERCHANTS HOME DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. a v. FRANK B. HALL CO. INC. a a B. a C. MERCHANTS HOME DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. a v. FRANK B. HALL CO. INC. a a B. a C. MERCHANTS HOME DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. a v. FRANK B. HALL CO. INC. a a B. a C., 50 F.3d 1486 (9th Cir. 1995)

. . . 9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 972, 104 S.Ct. 2346, 80 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984); Cal.Ins.Code §§ 790-790.10 . . .

K. REILLY, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A., 847 F. Supp. 951 (M.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . Constitutional Challenges to Florida Statutes In Ground one, Petitioner alleges that §§ 838.021, 836.10, and 790.10 . . .

AMMONS, v. STATE, 623 So. 2d 807 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . counsel and the court were of the understanding that the requested instruction was based on section 790.10 . . .

In A. P. a v. STATE, 622 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . .

STATE v. R. BOYD,, 615 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Boyd, with the improper exhibition of a firearm in violation of section 790.10, Florida Statutes (1991 . . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes (1991), upon which the charge was based, provides as follows: If any . . .

THACKER, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 796 F. Supp. 1338 (E.D. Cal. 1992)

. . . business of insurance’ ... particularly Article 6.5, Insurance Code of the State of California, §§ 790-790.10 . . . Code §§ 790-790.10, to the exclusive province of the Insurance Commissioner. . . .

LAMONT, v. STATE BROOKS, v. STATE, 597 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Brooks was also convicted for improper exhibition of a firearm pursuant to Section 790.10, Florida Statutes . . .

KASE, v. STATE, 581 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . By contrast, section 790.10, governing improper exhibition of a weapon, does not require that the victim . . . that the defendant make a threatening gesture with the weapon to be convicted of violating section 790.10 . . .

FERNANDEZ, Jr. v. STATE, 570 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . §§ 790.15, 790.10, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

GIBSON, v. STATE, 568 So. 2d 977 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Statutes, for the first degree misdemeanor of improper exhibition of a firearm as described in section 790.10 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES, 543 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1989)

. . . l)(a) None Assault — 784.011 Attempt Attempt Improper exhibition of dangerous weapons or firearms — 790.10 . . . battery — 784.-045(l)(b) Battery — 784.03 Attempt Improper exhibition of dangerous weapons or firearms — 790.10 . . . weapon is charged) Carrying concealed weapons — 790.01(1) Improper exhibition of dangerous weapons— 790.10 . . . firearm is charged) Carrying concealed firearm — 790.01(2) Improper exhibition of dangerous firearms— 790.10 . . .

C. W. a v. STATE, 528 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . presence of one or more persons in a rude, careless, angry or threatening manner” in violation of section 790.10 . . . C.W. moved for judgment of acquittal on the section 790.10 charge on the ground that Officer Riley’s . . . The trial court granted C.W.’s motion for judgment of acquittal on section 790.10 violation but adjudicated . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CRIMINAL, 508 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 1987)

. . . assault— 784.021(l)(a) Assault — 784.011 Attempt Improper exhibition of dangerous weapons or firearms — 790.10 . . . battery— 784.045(l)(b) Battery — 784.03 Attempt Improper exhibition of dangerous weapons or firearms — 790.10 . . . Assault — 784.011 Carrying concealed firearm— 790.01(2) Improper exhibition of dangerous firearms — 790.10 . . .

VANCE, v. STATE, 472 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1985)

. . . instructions on the lesser included offense of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon under section 790.10 . . . , Florida Statutes (1981), which provides: 790.10 Improper exhibition of dangerous weapons or firearms . . . relied on Solomon to argue that the separate convictions and sentences were impermissible, as section 790.10 . . . Section 790.10 by its express wording proscribes the act of exhibiting the weapon in the presence of . . . We approve the interpretation of section 790.10 in Solomon that precludes multiple convictions for a . . .

ELLIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 9 Fla. Supp. 2d 151 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . violation of Section 790.15 Florida Statutes, and reckless display of a firearm in violation of Section 790.10 . . .

GRUNEWALD, v. STATE, 455 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . lesser included offense of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon or firearm, a violation of section 790.10 . . . presence of one or more persons,” all three allegations being essential to allege a violation of section 790.10 . . .

VANCE, v. STATE, 452 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . act of exhibiting a firearm in the presence of two people constitutes a single offense under Section 790.10 . . . Insofar as Solomon finds the error of separate convictions under Section 790.10 fundamental, we disagree . . .

SOLOMON, v. STATE, 442 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . convictions and sentence based on two counts of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon, section 790.10 . . . Section 790.10, Florida Statutes (1981), states: 790.10. . . . An interpretation of section 790.10, Florida Statutes, which favors multiple convictions for a single . . .

V. DOLAN, v. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,, 558 F. Supp. 1308 (D. Colo. 1983)

. . . . § 790.10(d). . . . .

L. GELABERT, v. STATE, 407 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . aggravated assault, § 784.021(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1979), and improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon, § 790.10 . . .

PALACIO, v. STATE, 402 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . vehicle and, instructed that improper exhibition of a firearm, a first degree misdemeanor under Section 790.10 . . .

STONE, v. STATE, 402 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla.Stat. (1979). . § 784.021, Fla.Stat. (1979). . Willard v. . . . having or carrying any ... firearm .. . shall ... exhibit the same in a ... careless . .. manner ....” § 790.10 . . .

JAMES, v. STATE, 393 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 790.10, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

P. IRVING, v. STATE, 337 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 790.10 provides: If any person having or carrying any dirk, sword, sword cane, firearm, or other . . .

ADDRISI, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES, a, 503 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1974)

. . . all pertinent times, and particularly Article 6.5, Insurance Code of the State of California, §§ 790-790.10 . . .

Co. v., 67 Cust. Ct. 53 (Cust. Ct. 1971)

. . . pursuant to the provision for dog 'leashes, collars, muzzles, harnesses and similar dog equipment in item 790.10 . . . Marmax case, the court noted “that the classification of this merchandise pursuant to the above item 790.10 . . . since the Tariff Classification Study in the schedule 7, part 13, explanatory notes relating to item 790.10 . . . that the importations were properly classified pursuant to the provision for dog equipment under item 790.10 . . .

v., 65 Cust. Ct. 142 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . The merchandise was classified pursuant to item 790.10 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States which . . . We are also of the view that the language of item 790.10 provides for the importation as “similar dog . . . In light of the above, we hold that the instant merchandise was properly classified pursuant to item 790.10 . . .

v., 65 Cust. Ct. 29 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . These articles were classified pursuant to item 790.10 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States which . . . importation is chiefly used as a stake to which dogs are tied and therefore is equipment provided for in item 790.10 . . .

BASS, v. STATE, 232 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . Section 790.10, F.S. A.). . . .

COLON, v. E. A. HENDRY,, 408 F.2d 864 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . . § 790.10 (1967), F.S.A. . . .

J. FRENI, d b a Co. v. UNITED STATES, 283 F. Supp. 89 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . dutiable as (i) “dog equipment” similar to “Dog leashes, collars, muzzles, [and] harnesses” under Item 790.10 . . . Claimed under alternatively: Item 790.10 Dog leashes, collars, muzzles, harnesses, and similar dog equipment . . . Nor is there merit to plaintiff’s claim that the imported articles are dutiable under Item 790.10 as . . .

J. d b a Co. v., 60 Cust. Ct. 319 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . dutiable as (i) “dog equipment” similar to “Dog leashes, collars, muzzles, [and] harnesses” under Item 790.10 . . . Claimed under alternatively: Item 790.10 Dog leashes, collars, muzzles, harnesses, and similar dog equipment . . . Nor is there merit to plaintiff’s claim that the imported articles are dutiable under Item 790.10 as . . .

GEORGE BENNETT, AN INDIVIDUAL d b a GEORGE BENNETT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 178 Ct. Cl. 61 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . (b) The standby costs claimed by plaintiff totaling $27,-790.10 are unsupported hr the evidence. . . .

WRIGHT v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, F. d b a, 223 F. Supp. 660 (N.D. Ill. 1963)

. . . For said tour, plaintiffs paid to Burlington the sum of $790.10, the price of an escorted tour. . . .

NARDONE v. GENERAL MOTORS, INC., 207 F. Supp. 336 (D.N.J. 1962)

. . . . § 790.10 (c). . . .

YONKERS CONTRACTING COMPANY, v. MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY,, 24 F.R.D. 205 (D. Me. 1958)

. . . that it stated the total compensation to which plaintiff was entitled for work performed was $2,720,-790.10 . . .

BONNER v. ELIZABETH ARDEN,, 177 F.2d 703 (2d Cir. 1949)

. . . Swift & Co., 2 Cir., 173 F.2d 517, 520; Code Fed.Regs.Supp.1947, Title 29, § 790.10(d). . . .

MARKERT v. SWIFT CO., 173 F.2d 517 (2d Cir. 1949)

. . . the ‘particular place of business,’ ‘plant,’ ‘mine,’ ‘factory,’ ‘forest,’ etc.” 29 OFR, 1947 Supp. 790.10 . . .