The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . unconstitutional; (3) that the manner in which the execution was reset violated due process, and (4) that section 922.06 . . . Section 922.06(2), Florida Statutes Asay’s third claim is that Section 922.06, Florida Statutes, permits . . . does not appear to address the constitutional argument and, instead, states that sections 922.052 and 922.06 . . . Further, as it relates to the constitutionality of section 922.06, this Court has previously considered . . .
. . . Stat. (2013) (establishing procedures for the imposition and administration of the death penalty); § 922.06 . . .
. . . See § 922.06(1), Fla. . . . procedurally barred and, alternatively, that “there is no authority that supports a claim that section 922.06 . . . Moreover, when sections 922.052 and 922.06 are read as a whole, the Legislature clearly expresses an . . . warrant shall remain in full force and effect and the sentence shall be carried out as provided in s. 922.06 . . . Section 922.06(2), in turn, provides: (a) If execution of the death sentence is stayed by the Governor . . .
. . . 119, Florida Statutes, to access public records; (2) the Governor’s failure to comply with section 922.06 . . . fourth or fifth successive postconviction motion: (1) the Governor’s failure to comply with section 922.06 . . . Violation of Section 922.06(2), Florida Statutes Next, Tompkins argues that Governor Crist’s action on . . . October 2, 2008, in resetting his execution, violated section 922.06(2), Florida Statutes. . . . Section 922.06 provides: (1) The execution of a death sentence may be stayed only by the Governor or . . .
. . . In support of its argument, the Attorney General cites to section 922.06, Florida Statutes (2001). . . . .” § 922.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .
. . . than 48 hours after a new date for execution of the death sentence is set by the Governor under s. 922.06 . . .
. . . We are aware of section 922.06, Florida Statutes (1997), which provides that a stay may be entered only . . . judge's ruling, there is a legal issue as to whether he could enter a stay in compliance with section 922.06 . . .
. . . See § 922.06, Fla.Stat. (1987); see also State ex rel. Russell v. . . .
. . . See § 922.06, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .
. . . His loan payments and utilities for October totaled $922.06. 9. . . .
. . . .” § 922.06, Fla.Stat. (1983). In Hysler v. . . .
. . . . § 922.06, Fla. Stat. (1977). . McCall v. State, 136 Fla. 343, 186 So. 667 (1939). . R-68. . . . .
. . . Jones 66.00 Telephone call to George Hannaford in Hoquiam 5.78 Freight on second shipment 922.06 Handling . . . Jones 66.00 (c) Telephone call to George Hannaford in Hoquiam 5.78 (d) Freight on second shipment 922.06 . . .