Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 1006.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 1006.04 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 1006.04

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE
Chapter 1006
SUPPORT FOR LEARNING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 1006.04
1006.04 Educational multiagency services for students with severe emotional disturbance.
(1)(a) The multiagency network for students with emotional and behavioral disabilities works with education, mental health, child welfare, and juvenile justice professionals, along with other agencies and families, to provide children with mental illness or emotional and behavioral problems and their families with access to the services and supports they need to succeed. District school boards should provide educational programs, and state departments and agencies administering children’s mental health funds should provide mental health treatment and residential services when needed, as part of the multiagency network.
(b) The purpose of the multiagency network is to:
1. Enable students with severe emotional disturbance to learn appropriate behaviors, reduce dependency, and fully participate in all aspects of school and community living.
2. Develop individual programs for students with severe emotional disturbance, including necessary educational, residential, and mental health treatment services.
3. Provide programs and services as close as possible to the student’s home in the least restrictive manner consistent with the student’s needs.
4. Integrate a wide range of services necessary to support students with severe emotional disturbance and their families.
(c) The multiagency network shall:
1. Support and represent the needs of students in each school district in joint planning with fiscal agents of children’s mental health funds, including the expansion of school-based mental health services, transition services, and integrated education and treatment programs.
2. Improve coordination of services for children with or at risk of emotional or behavioral disabilities and their families by assisting multiagency collaborative initiatives to identify critical issues and barriers of mutual concern and develop local response systems that increase home and school connections and family engagement.
3. Increase parent and youth involvement and development with local systems of care.
4. Facilitate student and family access to effective services and programs for students with and at risk of emotional or behavioral disabilities that include necessary educational, residential, and mental health treatment services, enabling these students to learn appropriate behaviors, reduce dependency, and fully participate in all aspects of school and community living.
5. Participate in the planning process for promoting a coordinated system of care for children and adolescents pursuant to s. 394.4955.
(2) The department may award grants to district school boards for statewide planning and development of the multiagency network for students with severe emotional disturbance. The educational services shall be provided in a manner consistent with the requirements of ss. 402.22 and 1003.57.
(3) State departments and agencies may use appropriate funds for the multiagency network for students with severe emotional disturbance.
History.s. 269, ch. 2002-387; s. 23, ch. 2018-3; s. 11, ch. 2020-107.

F.S. 1006.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1006.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 1006.04


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1006.04
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1006.04.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. RANSFER,, 749 F.3d 914 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . evidence that has not yet been presented to the jury.’ ” (quoting 6 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04 . . .

BAUGH, BAUGH, v. CUPRUM S. A. DE C. V., 730 F.3d 701 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 1006.04[2] (Joseph M. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROM,, 528 F. App'x 24 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . See also 6 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04[2] (2d ed.2008) (distinguishing between summaries admitted . . .

UNITED STATES v. STONE,, 852 F. Supp. 2d 820 (E.D. Mich. 2012)

. . . .3d 1104, 1110 (6th Cir.1998), citing 2 McCormick on Evidence § 233; 6 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROSADO- PEREZ, v. v. v., 605 F.3d 48 (1st Cir. 2010)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04[3], at 1006-14 (J.M. . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. TRUDEAU,, 708 F. Supp. 2d 711 (N.D. Ill. 2010)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 1006.04[1] (Joseph M. . . .

UNITED STATES v. Sa l FLORES- DE- JES S,, 569 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 2009)

. . . Weinstein, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04[3]); Avilés-Colón, 536 F.3d at 21 n. 13 (expressing . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ,, 525 F.3d 85 (1st Cir. 2008)

. . . Mazza, 792 F.2d 1210 (1st Cir.1986); see also 6 Wein-stein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04[3] (observing . . .

R. LORRAINE v. MARKEL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 241 F.R.D. 534 (D. Md. 2007)

. . . Id. at § 1006.04[1] (“[t]he majority rule is that the summary itself is the evidence to be considered . . .

UNITED STATES, v. A. MILKIEWICZ,, 470 F.3d 390 (1st Cir. 2006)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04[1] (Joseph M. . . . Bray, 139 F.3d at 1112; 6 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04[2]. B. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GARCIA, v., 413 F.3d 201 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . summarizes evidence that has not yet been presented to the jury.” 6 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04 . . .

VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP. v. YELLOW BOOK USA, INC., 331 F. Supp. 2d 136 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . Berger, et al., Federal Evidence, § 1006.04[2] (Joseph McLauglin, ed.2000). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JANATI JANATI,, 374 F.3d 263 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . See 6 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, supra, § 1006.04[2], Thus, pedagogical charts or summaries may include . . . conclusions or opinions, or they may reveal inferences drawn in a way that would assist the jury. 6 id. § 1006.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. BRAY,, 139 F.3d 1104 (6th Cir. 1998)

. . . Strong ed., 4th ed.1992); 6 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 1006.04[2], p. 1006-7 (Joseph M. . . .