The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . August 2017, she found new employment at Fanimation, Inc. in the accounts payable department earning $ 19.23 . . . DC and Brenda earn $ 19.70 and $ 19.23 an hour respectively and both are employed full time. . . .
. . . Ward and Dobson are alleged to own 19.23% and 3.85%, respectively, of the basketball team. . . .
. . . plaintiff worked forty-hour weeks for fifty two weeks each year, she was paid an average hourly wage of $19.23 . . .
. . . amicus brief that if one assumes the Fire Chief works fifty-two weeks per year, he effectively earns $19.23 . . .
. . . . § 19.23(e)-l (1940 Supp.); Treas. Reg. No. 101, Art. 23(e) — 1 (1939); Treas. Reg. . . .
. . . Abbaszadeh’s hourly pay rate was $19.23. . . .
. . . Medlin’s starting salary was $19.23/hour or $42,000/year. Id. . . . representative, earned a starting salary of $18.75/hour whereas Medlin, an Admissions Representative I, earned $19.23 . . .
. . . Miller’s — she earned approximately $19.23 per hour, whereas Mr. . . .
. . . Proc. arts. 19.06, 19.22, 19.23, 19.25, 19.26 (explaining that under the commissioner system, the initial . . .
. . . Mister Budge’s base rate was $19.23 per hour. . . .
. . . (3), 135.293(a), 135.293(b) and 135.299(a), the requirements of which were triggered by FAR section 19.23 . . .
. . . It is undisputed that Almeida was given $1,000 a year, or $19.23 per week, which the Aguinagas refer . . . Period Per Day Week Week Week Week Per Week Per Week Per Week May 24, 2000-June 2001 16.5 6 99 $600 $19.23 . . . December 2001 16.5 3 49.5 $300 — $15.75 $ 6.60 $322.35 January 1,2002-December 31,2004 16.5 5 82.5 $500 $19.23 . . .
. . . Torts § 496B, cmt d (1963, 1964); Corbin on Contracts § 85.15, 455 (2003); Williston on Contracts § 19.23 . . .
. . . states that, since the time of the events giving rise to this action, TPHL has acquired Magnolia’s 19.23% . . . Again, TPHL today holds an additional 19.23% of TPL's stock. (Davies Decl. IT 32.) . Mr. . . .
. . . Crater admitted responsibility for only 19.23 grams, and asserted that the PSR contains inflated drug . . .
. . . Id. at ¶ 19.23(f). . . .
. . . Specifically, the Witkowskis invested $150,000 for the purchase of a 19.23% ’Mortgage Participation Interest . . .
. . . D.A. at 19.23. . . . D.A. at 19.23. . . . D.A. at 19.23. . . . D.A. at 19.23. Mr. . . . D.A. at 19.23. . . .
. . . hearing loss in both ears, and the parties agree that he suffered a binaural hearing impairment of 19.23% . . . This figure was based on the fact that Wilkerson’s stipulated 19.23% hearing loss entitled him to 38.46 . . .
. . . Stat. ch. 120 ¶ 500.23-la (now found in 35 ILCS 205/19.23-la (Smith-Hurd 1993). . . .
. . . regular rates, using 40 hours per week as the divisor (as plaintiffs wish), were between $12.02 and $19.23 . . . Therefore, plaintiffs’ claims are for at least $12.02 to $19.23 per hour for 15 to 35 hours per week, . . .
. . . Regs. 103, § 19.23(0-3 (Internal Revenue Code of 1939); 26 CFR § 1.167(a)-3 (1961) (Internal Revenue . . .
. . . Ownership of the ranch was split between Herb and Don (61.02%), Enterprises (19.23%), and Land & Cattle . . . In this case, however, the guarantor, Enterprises, was a 19.23 per cent co-purchaser of the property, . . . deal, Herb and Don collectively took a 61.-02% undivided interest in the ranch; Enterprises took a 19.23% . . .
. . . See Treas.Reg. 86, Art. 23(m)-l(h) (1935); Treas.Reg. 94, Art. 23(m)-l(h) (1936); Treas.Reg. 103, § 19.23 . . .
. . . McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 19.23 at 924 (2d ed. 1984). . . .
. . . had net sales of $10,154,000 and gross profits of $1,953,-000 resulting in a gross profit margin of 19.23 . . . statement for the period ending March 31, 1987 showed a decline in the gross profit margin from the 19.23 . . . results documented a general financial decline, as well as a decline in the gross profit margin from 19.23 . . . 31, 1986 (the first six months of O’Day’s fiscal year 1987), O’Day’s actual gross profit margin was 19.23% . . .
. . . By contrast, of the 395 classes at A.I. duPont High School, which had only 19.23% minority enrollment . . .
. . . These month end adjustments represent 19.23 percent of the $243,070.49 total invoice amount. . . . Accordingly, Braniff is entitled to a 19.23 percent credit on the Dallas-Fort Worth shipment that Conoco . . .
. . . Nov. 1986 16.24 15.59 16.48 16.57 17.21 17.62 First Half Second Half 1987 19.23 20.60 1988 23.51 26.02 . . .
. . . See 3 Callman § 19.23. . . .
. . . One person’s salary rate is $19.23 per hour, for a total ranging from $13,845 to $38,460. . . . over allowance is not unusual, and declined Dayton’s request to order reimbursement at the rate of $19.23 . . .
. . . Thus, 19.23% of the portfolio was held in excess equities. . . . portion of all equities that were “excess” equities, Wagner divided the percentage of excess securities (19.23% . . .
. . . . § 19.23(a)-15, was inserted into the treasury regulations in response to the Revenue Act of 1942, Pub.L . . .
. . . $550,000 Irving will receive under the plan, payments that are equivalent to an effective interest rate of 19.23% . . . seventh year in a balloon payment at 11% per annum interest, Irving will receive an effective return of 19.23% . . .
. . . See, generally, Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice, Vol. 2, Special Permits, §§ 19.23-19.24, . . .
. . . McQuillin, Law of Municipal Corporations § 19.23, p. 425 (3d rev. ed. 1981). . . .
. . . Bedford, Accountants’ Handbook 19.23 (5th ed. 1970). . . .
. . . Regs. 103, § 19.23 (m)-l (f) (1940), and it continued in successive regulations to the 1939 Code. . . .
. . . The precise questions to be asked are set out in Art. 19.23, which, for the most part, tracks the language . . .
. . . Section 19.23(p)(1)(D)-1, Regs. 103, adopted by the Secretary of the Treasury to clarify section 23(p . . .
. . . the redemption bears to all voting stock at such time 80% of (ii) 8/17/73 24.02 30.00 24.00 9/28/73 19.23 . . . 24.02 19.21 10/19/73 15.46 19.23 15.38 11/23/73 12.50 15.46 12.36 12/21/73 10.10 12.50 10.00 1/18/74 . . .
. . . and as of September 1977, the Alexis I. duPont School District consisted of 78.38% white students and 19.23% . . .
. . . “The right conferred by § 206 is absolute and unlimited.” 6A Collier on Bankruptcy 19.23, at 303 (14th . . .
. . . The precise questions to be asked are set out in Art. 19.23, which, for the most part, tracks the language . . .
. . . Treas.Reg. 103, § 19.23(m)-16. . T.D. 4333, supra at 31. . . . .
. . . Reg. 103, § 19.23 (m)-16. T. D. 4333, supra at 31. . . .
. . . tested,” Art. 19.21, and they are “interrogated,” Art. 19.22, by being asked prescribed questions, Art. 19.23 . . .
. . . Photographs 19.23 e. . . .
. . . each installment as follows: Payment Date Amount interest 9/20/74 $1,923.08 $24.04 10/ 4/74 1,923.08 19.23 . . .
. . . pro-union) 5.79 Bordon (pro-union) 1.00 1.00 Employee Before Union Activity After Ballew (non-union) 19.23 . . .
. . . 1970 Census found that over 800,000 families in the Nation had annual incomes of less than $1,000 or $19.23 . . .
. . . Reg. 103, § 19.23(m)-19(a) (1) (1939), were amended to give the taxpayer the option to either capitalize . . .
. . . See Begs. 103, sec. 19.23(m)-19(a) (1) (1939). . . .
. . . Ill, Sec. 29.23(m)-l(f) ; Reg. 103, Sec. 19.23(m)-l(f) ; Reg. 101, Art. 23 (m)-l(g) ; Reg. 94, Art. 23 . . .
. . . specific case must be established by factual data supporting such rate.” 5 Nichols on Eminent Domain, § 19.23 . . .
. . . See art. 23 (e)-3, Eegs. 101 (1939); sec. 19.23(e)-3, Eegs. 103 (1940); sec. 29.23(e)-3, Eegs. 111 (1943 . . . (193il), Regs. 77 (1933) ; art. 23i(l)-6, Regs. 86 (1935), Regs. 94 (1936), Regs. 101 (1939) ; sec. 19.23 . . .
. . . Reg. 103, § 19.23(1)-3 (1939 Code) ; Treas. Reg. Ill, § 29.28 (Z)-3 (1939 Code). . . .
. . . Treas.Reg. 103, § 19.23(l)-3 (1939 Code); Treas.Reg. 111, § 29.23(l)-3 (1939 Code). . . .
. . . The foregoing provision was reissued verbatim as section 19.23(a)-13 of Regulations 103 (1940), section . . .
. . . Non-whites comprise 27.6% of the adult population of the seven parishes and 19.23% of the persons registered . . .
. . . Regulations was adopted in 1941 when T.D. 5054, 1941-1 Cum.Bull. 227, amend-eel Regs. 103, Section 19.23 . . .
. . . Reg. 103, §19.23(m)-1; Treas. Reg. 111, §29.23(m)-1; and Treas. . . .
. . . Regs. 86 (1934 Act) ; art. 23(a)-11, Regs. 94 (1936 Act) ; art. 23(a)-11, Regs. 101 (1938 Act) ; sec. 19.23 . . .
. . . Essentially the same wording was contained in Regulation 103, § 19.23 (a)-l which was in effect when . . .
. . . items claimed to be incomplete, and other adjustments, and offered to pay plaintiff the balance of $19.23 . . . (h) Plaintiff refused to accept the $19.23 proffered, and, on March 16, 1944, filed, with the Comptroller . . .
. . . Regulations 86, 94 and 101, promulgated under the Revenue Acts of 1934, 1936 and 1938, and Sections 19.23 . . .
. . . . 110 of Regs, 65 and 69; art. 130 of Regs. 74 and 77; art. 23(a)-10 of Regs. 86, 94, and 101; sec. 19.23 . . .
. . . -l (1935) ; Regs. 94, art. 23(m)-l(g) (1936) ; Regs. 101, art. 23(m) — 1(g) (1939); Regs. 103, sec. 19.23 . . .
. . . )(2) was added to the 1939 Code by section 121(a) of the 1942 Revenue Act, Regulations 103, section 19.23 . . .
. . . This regulation is now section 19.23(d)-1 of Treasury Regulations 103, promulgated under the Internal . . .
. . . This regulation is now section 19.23(d)-l of Treasury Regulations 103, promulgated under the Internal . . .
. . . This is the same test subsequently adopted by the Treasury Department as section 19.23(a)-15 of Regulations . . .
. . . Its § 19.23 (1)-1 and § 19.23 (l)-(2) complement each other and seem to advise the taxpayer how to compute . . . point out that Regulá-tions 111, issued in 1942, deleted the words “property in the business” from § 19.23 . . . “Sec. 19.23 (1) — 1. . . . “Sec. 19.23 (1) — 2. . . . (See section 19.23 (a)-4.) . . .
. . . 23(l)-3 under the 1936 Act; Regulations 101, Article 23(l)— 3 under the 1938 Act; Regulations 103, § 19.23 . . .
. . . Prior to December 8, 1942, Section 19.23(0-1 provided an allowance for depreciation which “plus the salvage . . .
. . . Reg. 103, § 19.23 (m)-l, August 23, 1939. . . .
. . . and tear, and obsolescence of property used in the trade or business, or treated under [Reg.] section 19.23 . . .
. . . Reg. 94 and 101, promulgated under the Revenue Acts of 1936 and 1938, §§ 19.23 (q)-l, 29.23 (q)-l, and . . . Reg. 101, promulgated under the Revenue Act of 1938, and thereafter in §§ 19.23 (o)-l, 29.23 (o) — 1, . . .
. . . It reads in part: “It is apparent from a reading of this regulation Reg. 103, Sec. 19.23(e)-2 that if . . .
. . . 1936, Article 23(o)— of Treasury Regulations 101, promulgated under the Revenue Act of 1938, Sections 19.23 . . .
. . . Treasury Regulation 103, section 19.23 (a) (6), governing the years 1940 and 1941, are similar. . . .
. . . Treasury Regulation 103, section 19.23(a)(6), governing the years 1940 and 1941, are similar. . . .
. . . (1)-10 appeared as Art. 23 (1)-10 of Regulations 86 (1934), 94 (1936), and 101 (1938), and as Sec. 19.23 . . .
. . . Ill, sec. 19.23 (a)-1. . . . .
. . . Washington Dehydrated Food Co., 8 Cir., 89 F.2d 606, 609; Treasury Regulations 103, Sec. 19.23(a)-6. . . . bargain between the employer and the employees before the services were rendered, as required by Section 19.23 . . . The applicable portion of this section reads “Section. 19.23 (a)-6. . . .
. . . the same as the below quoted sections) promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code, provide: “Sec. 19.23 . . . (c)-l Taxes. — Subject to the exceptions stated in this section and section 19.23 (c)-2 and 19.23 (c) . . .
. . . (See section 19.23(m)-15 of Regulations 103.) . . .
. . . D. 5196, amending section 19.23 (a)-15 of Regulations 103; and section 29.23 (a)-15 of Regulations 111 . . .
. . . Regulations 103, § 19.23 (a)-7. See Fleischer v. . . . Regulations 103, § 19.23(a)-6, now Regulations 111, § 29.23-(a)— 6; See the eases collected in 51-1 C.C.H . . . As to bonuses, see Regulations 103, § 19.23(a)-8, now Regulations 111, § 29.23 (a)-8. . . .
. . . Section 19.23 (e)-3, Regulations 103; section 29.23 (e)-3, Regulations 111. . . .
. . . Section 19.23 (c) — 1 of Treasury Regulations 103. (Appendix, Infra.) . Magruder v. . . .
. . . See 26 C.F.R., 1940 Supp., 19.23(m)-10. . . . See 26 C.F.R., 1940 Supp., 19.23 (m)-2. . . . .
. . . Section 19.23 (a)-6 of Regulations 103 says in part: “The circumstances to be taken into consideration . . .
. . . Section 19.23 (a)-6 •of Regulations 103 says in part: The circumstances to be taken into consideration . . .
. . . R., 1940 Supp., 19.23 (m)-2. . . .
. . . Regulations 103, section 19.23 (e)-1. . . .
. . . The relevant parts of Section 19.23(a)-10 of Treasury Regulations 103 and of Section 29.23(a)-10 of Treasury . . . Sections 19.23(1)-5 and 29.23(1)-5 of Treasury Regulations 103 and 111 both provide that “The capital . . . The applicable rule is stated,in Section 19.23(l)-3 of Treasury Regulations 103 as follows: “Intangibles . . .
. . . Regulation 103, § 19.23(a)-8, provides that compensation to be deductible must be only in such amount . . .
. . . This case involves a construction of the specific provisions of § 23(a) and § 19.23(a)-2 of Treasury . . . The statute did not expressly limit traveling expenses to those' reasonable in ' amount, but § 19.23( . . .
. . . This is clear from even a casual reading -of the apposite Treasury Regulations, 103, Section 19.23(l) . . .