The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Mexico, and Poland investigations and calculated final dumping margins of 9.66 percent to 44.30 percent, 19.52 . . .
. . . On March 28, Barrick opened at $19.52 and closed at $19.08. . . .
. . . based on an assumption that Brocade stock “standalone” (i.e., without a merger) was worth $13.58 to $19.52 . . . Lead Plaintiff maintains that, if the $13.58-$19.52 value of Brocade stock standalone had been disclosed . . . defendants knew or should have known that the implied Brocade stock standalone value was $13.58 to $19.52 . . . consideration value determined by Morgan- Stanley, Brocade stock standalone had to be worth $13.58-$19.52 . . . The SAC does not include any reference to the $13.58 — $19.52 figure. . . .
. . . Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ conduct caused Cablevision’s stock price to drop from $19.52 per share . . .
. . . for violations of the CLA and are instead limiting recovery to a violation of the usury statute (RCW 19.52 . . . of any Washington State cases applying equitable tolling to allow an untimely usury claim under RCW 19.52 . . . At that time, relief was not requested under RCW 19.52. . . . monetarily injured in this loan transaction in paying a usurious rate of interest in violation of RCW 19.52 . . .
. . . Compare DX 19 at 19.52 (representing PMI checklist completed by Greg Turner), with DX 19 at 19.53 (representing . . .
. . . Permenter; 19.52% to Meredith; and 19.52% to Nancy. . . .
. . . R.C.W. 19.52. Prosser v. F/V CRYSTAL VIKING, 1993 WL 668292, 1994 A.M.C. 859, 863 (W.D.Wash. 1993). . . .
. . . New York was a signatory to the 1950, 1951 and 19.52 NBCWAs. . . .
. . . valuations of the fair market value of Food 4 Less stock: Valuation Date Share Price December 31, 1991 $19.52 . . . These statements valued the Food 4 Less stock at $19.52 per share (Id.). . . . are: (1) whether the ESOP was required to pay plaintiffs based upon the December 31, 1991 valuation ($19.52 . . . They contend, however, that they were entitled to be paid their distribution at the previous value ($19.52 . . . adequate explanation, instead claiming conclusorily that "Hayes' participant statement shows the same $19.52 . . .
. . . . § 19.52 (providing for notice to claimant that an administrative appeal has been entered — “outlining . . .
. . . . § 19.52 (1992). . . .
. . . Two months after he sold the stock he valued it at $19.52 per share on his personal financial statement . . .
. . . 10.78 11.16 Cashiers & Food Checkers 8 $33.43 $35.03 $37.03 $39.03 $41.03 One Meal 3 16.72 17.52 18.52 19.52 . . .
. . . 14, 1910, on the date of decedent’s death, is 15.93 years, using United States Life Table No. 38, or 19.52 . . .
. . . cent of the monthly benefit paid to the man, because the average woman in this retirement plan lives 19.52 . . .
. . . II___ 19.52-53 2,290,000 Myers-Laguna Co______ 1952-53 675,840 A.F G. . . .
. . . The difference in elevation between the two is 19.52 feet. Mr. . . .
. . . put to public bearing, submitted on May '5, 1952, decided in favor of subsidization on September 3, 19.52 . . .
. . . to use the proportionate profits method of computing percentage depletion on coal mined by it during 19.52 . . .
. . . The claim was first mailed to the' Atomic Energy Commission at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on August 4, 19.52 . . .
. . . .-32 that was due, according to the terms of the note, on March 31, 19.52. . . .
. . . Taxes for 1951 and 19.52 were levied in the customary way. . . .
. . . .; Regulations 103, secs. 19.52-2,19.142-4. The petitioner here was in an analogous position. . . .
. . . entitled to a judgment herein in the amount of $1,532.05 less the item of $119.52, which item of $i 19.52 . . .
. . . 22.88%; the Central Railroad of New Jersey, 17.12%; the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, 19.52% . . .
. . . Company and the Temple Iron Company to buy at par 29.96 per cent., 17.12 per cent., 22.88 per cent., 19.52 . . . The Reading, 29.96 per cent.; the Lehigh Valley, 22.88 per cent.; the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western, 19.52 . . .
